Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Hillary Probed


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Hillary Probed Page: <<   < prev  75 76 [77] 78 79   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Hillary Probed - 7/1/2016 5:04:03 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

you went thru the entire 1516 messages?
LMFAO
ok, tell you what Im gonna do, Im gonna do the same, and count all the posts
And we can dissect the numbers...Ill be back on monday with the results.
Nothing I have posted, you can or have been able to argue with, nor debunked, or even found to be wrong.
where as YOUR and your moronic drivel has been proven to be "factless" so far.
oh a nice edit..well done, Im afraid mine will be a bit more comprehensive than yours, LOL




if you go thru the posts really? (you are wasting your time) be sure that the ones saying 'according to wnd or Faux nuze or Judicial felch or whatever' are counted as refelches.

I will give you the fact count to save you that time anyhow. ZERO.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 1521
RE: Hillary Probed - 7/1/2016 5:07:44 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

you went thru the entire 1516 messages?
LMFAO
ok, tell you what Im gonna do, Im gonna do the same, and count all the posts
And we can dissect the numbers...Ill be back on monday with the results.
Nothing I have posted, you can or have been able to argue with, nor debunked, or even found to be wrong.
where as YOUR and your moronic drivel has been proven to be "factless" so far.
oh a nice edit..well done, Im afraid mine will be a bit more comprehensive than yours, LOL




if you go thru the posts really? (you are wasting your time) be sure that the ones saying 'according to wnd or Faux nuze or Judicial felch or whatever' are counted as refelches.

I will give you the fact count to save you that time anyhow. ZERO.

As I was only bitching about his posts, Im gonna start with those. Dead easy.
Then the other delusionals. if need be.




_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 1522
RE: Hillary Probed - 7/1/2016 5:09:30 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
*snicker* a glutton for punishment. Drudge is lefty in his hallucination. Even sanity wouldnt felch that shit. Then you have the problem that lefty papers also allow righties to write for them, the 147 fbi agents problems, but they do retract their horseshit later. They cant fire them for their ineffectual nutsuckerism or there would be no nutsuckers in the media.

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 7/1/2016 5:12:21 AM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 1523
RE: Hillary Probed - 7/1/2016 5:33:44 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
"Judicial Watch Asks Justice Inspector General to Investigate Loretta Lynch-Bill Clinton Meeting"

quote:

Judicial Watch today requested that the U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General investigate the meeting yesterday between Bill Clinton and Attorney General Loretta Lynch:

Attorney General Loretta Lynch met privately with former President William J. Clinton on board a parked private plane on the west side of Sky Harbor International Airport in Phoenix, Arizona on June 29, 2016, according to multiple press reports.

President Clinton is the spouse of Hillary Rodham Clinton, the former Secretary of State, who is purportedly the subject of a national security crime investigation pertaining to the mishandling of national defense information processed by Mrs. Clinton’s personal server during her tenure as secretary.

Additionally, there are press reports that a federal public corruption investigation is on-going concerning conflicts of interest and abuse of official government office involving the financial “commitments” to the Clinton Foundation, speaking fees for President Clinton and former Secretary Clinton’s official acts. President Clinton may be a target of that investigation.

Attorney General Lynch’s meeting with President Clinton creates the appearance of a violation of law, ethical standards and good judgment. Attorney General Lynch’s decision to breach the well-defined ethical standards of the Department of Justice and the American legal profession is an outrageous abuse of the public’s trust. Her conduct and statements undermine confidence in her ability to objectively investigate and prosecute possible violations of law associated with President Clinton and Secretary Clinton. This incident undermines the public’s faith in the fair administration of justice. Simply stated, Attorney General Lynch’s June 29, 2016 meeting with former President Clinton creates the broad public impression that “the fix is in.”

Judicial Watch requests your immediate and thorough investigation of the facts, circumstances, and appearances of ethical, regulatory and legal violations by Attorney General Lynch in connection with her meeting with former President William J. Clinton – and that you report your findings and recommendations to the American public.

Judicial Watch cites in its complaint 18 USC §§ 202 – 209; Executive Order 12674 on Principles of Ethical Conduct as amended by EO 12731; Uniform Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch, 5 CFR Part 2635; Department of Justice regulations, 5 CFR Part 3801; Department of Justice regulations, 28 CFR Part 45; Executive branch standards of conduct, 5 USC § 735; and, United States Department of Justice Ethics Handbook for On and Off-Duty Conduct, 14 Principles for Ethical Conduct:

“14. Employees shall endeavor to avoid any actions creating the appearance that they are violating the law or the ethical standards set forth in this part. Whether particular circumstances create an appearance that the law or these standards have been violated shall be determined from the perspective of a reasonable person with knowledge of the relevant facts.”
5 C.F.R 2635.101 (b)

“An employee shall endeavor to avoid any actions creating the appearance that the employee is violating the law or the ethical standards set forth in this part.”
5 CFR 2635.101(b)(14)

“Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s meeting with Bill Clinton severely undermined the already low public confidence in her agency’s criminal investigation of Hillary Clinton,” stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “In addition to this IG investigation, Judicial Watch has already sent Freedom of Information Act requests about this scandalous meeting.”


http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-asks-justice-inspector-general-investigate-loretta-lynch-bill-clinton-meeting/

(in reply to lovmuffin)
Profile   Post #: 1524
RE: Hillary Probed - 7/1/2016 5:37:00 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/02/us/politics/loretta-lynch-hillary-clinton-email-server.html


Lynch to Accept F.B.I. Recommendations in Clinton Email Inquiry, Official Says


Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch plans to announce on Friday that she will accept whatever recommendation career prosecutors and the F.B.I. director make about whether to bring charges related to Hillary Clinton’s personal email server, a Justice Department official said. Her decision removes the possibility that a political appointee will overrule investigators in the case.

The Justice Department had been moving toward such an arrangement for months — officials said in April that it was being considered — but a private meeting between Ms. Lynch and former President Bill Clinton this week set off a political furor and made the decision all but inevitable.

Republicans said the meeting, which took place at the Phoenix airport, had compromised the independence of the investigation as the F.B.I. was winding it down. Some called for Ms. Lynch to recuse herself, but she did not take herself off the case — one that could influence a presidential election.

Ms. Lynch plans to discuss the matter at a conference in Aspen, Colo., on Friday. The Justice Department declined to comment. The official who confirmed the discussion did so on the condition of anonymity because the internal decision-making process is normally kept confidential.

The F.B.I. is investigating whether Mrs. Clinton, her aides or anyone else broke the law by setting up a private email server for her to use as secretary of state. Internal investigators have concluded that the server was used to send classified information, and Republicans have seized on the matter to question Mrs. Clinton’s judgment.

For the Justice Department, the central question is whether the conduct met the legal standard for the crime of mishandling classified information.

Ms. Lynch said that the meeting with Mr. Clinton was unplanned, largely social and did not touch on the email investigation. She suggested that he walked uninvited from his plane to her government plane, both of which were parked on a tarmac at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport.

“He did come over and say hello, and speak to my husband and myself, and talk about his grandchildren and his travels and things like that,” Ms. Lynch said at a news conference in Los Angeles on Wednesday, where she was promoting community policing. “That was the extent of that. And no discussions were held into any cases or things like that.”

That did not mollify Republican lawmakers, who said the meeting raised questions about the integrity of the government’s investigation.

“In light of the apparent conflicts of interest, I have called repeatedly on Attorney General Lynch to appoint a special counsel to ensure the investigation is as far from politics as possible,” Senator John Cornyn, Republican of Texas and a member of the Judiciary Committee, said in a statement on Thursday.

The meeting created an awkward situation for Ms. Lynch, a veteran prosecutor who was nominated from outside Washington’s normal political circles. In her confirmation, her allies repeatedly sought to contrast her with her predecessor, Eric H. Holder Jr., an outspoken liberal voice in the administration who clashed frequently with Republicans who accused him of politicizing the office.

Ms. Lynch has said she wants to handle the Clinton investigation like any other case. Since the attorney general often follows the recommendations of career prosecutors, Ms. Lynch is keeping the regular process largely intact.

Her reassurance that she will not overrule her investigators, however, is significant. When the F.B.I. sought to bring felony charges against David H. Petraeus, the former C.I.A. director, for mishandling classified information and lying about it, Mr. Holder stepped in and reduced the charge to a misdemeanor. That decision created a deep — and public — rift.

The F.B.I. is expected to make a recommendation to the Justice Department in the coming weeks, though agents have yet to interview Mrs. Clinton. While some legal experts said they believed that criminal indictments in the case were unlikely, the investigation continues to cast a shadow over Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign.

Donald J. Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, seized on the private encounter, describing it in a radio interview as a “sneak” meeting and saying it exposed the rigged nature of the process.

Even some Democrats criticized the meeting. “It doesn’t send the right signal,” Senator Chris Coons, Democrat of Delaware, said in response to a question on CNN’s “New Day.” While he said he believed that Ms. Lynch was an independent prosecutor, “I think she should have steered clear, even of a brief, casual, social meeting with the former president.”

Beyond the day-to-day workings of the Justice Department, there is precedent for explicitly relying on career officials to make politically charged decisions. When the Justice Department was considering whether to recommend sanctions against former Bush administration lawyers who approved waterboarding, Mr. Holder relied on his most senior career prosecutor to make the decision. No sanctions were recommended.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 1525
RE: Hillary Probed - 7/1/2016 6:43:41 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
"Reporter: FBI ordered ‘no photos, no pictures, no cell phones’ during Clinton/Lynch meeting"

quote:

Reporter Christopher Sign of ABC 15 in Phoenix, AZ appeared on The O’Reilly Factor Thursday night to talk about his scoop involving that secret meeting between former President Bill Clinton and Attorney General Loretta Lynch...
Sign lays out how the story developed and then he leaves this little nugget:

quote:

“The former president steps into her plane. They then speak for 30 minutes privately. The FBI there on the tarmac instructing everybody around ‘no photos, no pictures, no cell phones.'”


Interesting.

First of all, it isn’t the FBI’s job to tell journalists or private citizens they can’t take photographs of a former president and the Attorney General. What were the agents going to do, arrest people for taking a picture or video?

Also, if there was nothing wrong with the meeting and it was totally innocent, why were federal agents instructed to demand no one take a picture?

Finally, let’s stop focusing on the fact that this meeting was inappropriate because Clinton’s wife is under investigation by Lynch’s Justice Department. I mean, that’s bad, but it’s actually letting Lynch and Clinton off the hook a bit. By focusing on the appearance of conflict because Hillary Clinton is being investigated, we are willfully overlooking the very real conflict in the fact that Clinton himself is under investigation, as the Grand Poo-bah at the Clinton Foundation. (Fox News)

quote:

The FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of private email as secretary of state has expanded to look at whether the possible “intersection” of Clinton Foundation work and State Department business may have violated public corruption laws, three intelligence sources not authorized to speak on the record told Fox News.

This new investigative track is in addition to the focus on classified material found on Clinton’s personal server.

“The agents are investigating the possible intersection of Clinton Foundation donations, the dispensation of State Department contracts and whether regular processes were followed,” one source said.


Yes, the investigation into the intersection of Clinton Foundation donations and the State Department slimes Hillary Clinton since it happened during her tenure as Secretary of State, but what about Bill Clinton? If the State Department and Hillary Clinton acted improperly or illegally by commingling staff and by granting favors to Clinton Foundation donors, isn’t the Clinton Foundation, and Bill Clinton equally guilty of wrongdoing?

This may explain why the day after the surreptitious meeting in Phoenix, Lynch’s Justice Department informed a judge they were going to drag their feet on the release of emails connecting the former president’s foundation and the State Department: (Daily Caller)

quote:

Department of Justice officials filed a motion in federal court late Wednesday seeking a 27-month delay in producing correspondence between former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s four top aides and officials with the Clinton Foundation and Teneo Holdings, a closely allied public relations firm that Bill Clinton helped launch.

If the court permits the delay, the public won’t be able to read the communications until October 2018, about 22 months into her prospective first term as President. The four senior Clinton aides involved were Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Michael Fuchs, Ambassador-At-Large Melanne Verveer, Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills, and Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin.


I guess when all of this adds up, it’s clear why Lynch and her FBI agents were so intent on keeping this inappropriate meeting private.


http://hotair.com/archives/2016/07/01/reporter-fbi-ordered-no-photos-no-pictures-no-cell-phones-during-clintonlynch-meeting/


< Message edited by bounty44 -- 7/1/2016 6:44:36 AM >

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 1526
RE: Hillary Probed - 7/1/2016 6:46:45 AM   
AgentX99


Posts: 8
Joined: 6/9/2012
Status: offline
I was wondering where all of the Trump University Grads hung out . .

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 1527
RE: Hillary Probed - 7/1/2016 7:31:48 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:


Bolshevik44
the short of it is---the comrades' queen did lots of things wrong, badly, and criminally---and they don't have anything of substance to defend her but will go to their graves doing so anyways because "party" matters more than honesty and their hatred of the other side clouds their ability to think justly.


The felchers shitbreather has not demonstrated anything criminally and have nothing of substance to demonstrate criminality and will go to their toiletflushes because felchbobbling matters more than honesty and facts, they have taken such a shitkicking in reality that they would felch any toilet to not come up with a mouthful of turd, but they always do.

They do not think, they have no capability or stomach for it.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 1528
RE: Hillary Probed - 7/1/2016 9:21:25 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:



That did not mollify Republican lawmakers, who said the meeting raised questions about the integrity of the government’s investigation.


And they should know having no integrity and investigating factless horseshit for these many years.

"Hey, can we spend the blood and treasure of the US getting this Johnny from the call in show as an expert witness?"



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 1529
RE: Hillary Probed - 7/1/2016 10:04:51 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
another take on the meeting:

"A Suspicious Meeting in Phoenix Probably Means FBI Charges against Clinton"

quote:

On Tuesday Attorney General Loretta Lynch met former President Bill Clinton at a Phoenix airport where they held a discussion that lasted at least thirty minutes. Lynch’s explanation for her meeting with Clinton was that it was entirely coincidental and they mainly discussed his two infant grandchildren. This is unconvincing if not preposterous...

Meeting Clinton coincidentally or otherwise was risky a risky and ill-advised thing for Lynch to do unless she -- and likely Obama -- thought it absolutely necessary. Lynch is a political hack but not a fool. Merely meeting privately with the former president when she is presumably impartially overseeing the criminal investigation of his wife stinks to high heaven, and compromises her sufficiently that there are already calls for her to recuse herself from the matter...Lynch would not have risked the meeting, coincidental or otherwise, unless she had something important to say.

Likewise, if Bill Clinton spends more than thirty seconds a day thinking about his diapered progeny as opposed to his own more personal interests, I’d be shocked. That even the glib Clinton could spend thirty minutes on the topic defies belief.

On the other hand, it is likely that investigation of Hillary’s email scandal is at or near completion. As it is, the investigation has lasted far longer than necessary for competent FBI investigators to make determinations as to Hillary’s criminal liability in the email matter, at a minimum with regard to her preservation of government records and handling of classified material. It is also probable that sufficient evidence has been compiled to make similar judgments about whether Clinton attempted to obstruct justice. Whether Clinton engaged in pay for play involvement by the Clinton Foundation during her tenure as secretary of state might be a more involved matter, but that the FBI should have come to conclusions on at least the other matters is highly probable...

Two parallel investigations have no doubt put at least some professional and ethical pressure on the FBI. The State Department’s inspector general excoriated Clinton for her private email practices and violation of Department policies. The report did not implicate Clinton criminally, but that was not the purpose of the investigation, and considering it was produced by the department Clinton led, and that has bent over backward to delay probes and protect her, it is telling. The other investigation by the private group Judicial Watch is civil under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA.) Hillary’s aides have also been interviewed in that case, with Brian Pagliano, the IT guy, asserting his 5th Amendment right not to incriminate himself over 125 times during his deposition. Hillary’s right hand gal, Huma Abedin, confirmed in her testimony what was already clear from numerous emails that have slowly come to light under the investigations -- that if nothing else Hillary repeatedly lied and misled the public as to the reasons behind the establishment of the private server. There is now not a scintilla of doubt that the system was set up to avoid federal record keeping requirements and exposure to FOIA.

It is impossible to believe [unless you are a comrade on collarspace] that an honest FBI investigation would not at a minimum find Hillary criminally responsible for violating statutes governing retention of official records and maintaining and securing classified material, at least based on gross negligence, but now with convincing evidence that her deliberate course of conduct demonstrates clear criminal intent. Hillary’s blatant lies and obfuscations through the course of the various investigations, along with the erasure of the server’s memory also present a clear case of obstruction of justice. It is hard to square Pagliano’s repeated invocation of the 5th Amendment with anything but that...

[here is the fellows speculation]

It is highly unlikely that Lynch will move to indict Hillary, but the political effects of an FBI referral would be serious. She could not very well consult with the target of the investigation and so did the next best thing, seeking out the ex-president, delivering the bad news, probably along with assurances that regardless of the FBI conclusions, she will not move forward.

Either that or she and Bill just bumped into each other thousands of miles from Washington and New York and interrupted their busy schedules chat about his grandkids.


http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/07/a_suspicious_meeting_in_phoenix_probably_means_fbi_charges_against_clinton_.html#ixzz4DB2SuIW1

(in reply to AgentX99)
Profile   Post #: 1530
RE: Hillary Probed - 7/1/2016 10:12:43 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

another take on the meeting:

"A Suspicious Meeting in Phoenix Probably Means FBI Charges against Clinton"

quote:

On Tuesday Attorney General Loretta Lynch met former President Bill Clinton at a Phoenix airport where they held a discussion that lasted at least thirty minutes. Lynch’s explanation for her meeting with Clinton was that it was entirely coincidental and they mainly discussed his two infant grandchildren. This is unconvincing if not preposterous...

[snip ...]

It is impossible to believe [unless you are a comrade on collarspace] that an honest FBI investigation would not at a minimum find Hillary criminally responsible for violating statutes governing retention of official records and maintaining and securing classified material, at least based on gross negligence, but now with convincing evidence that her deliberate course of conduct demonstrates clear criminal intent. Hillary’s blatant lies and obfuscations through the course of the various investigations, along with the erasure of the server’s memory also present a clear case of obstruction of justice. It is hard to square Pagliano’s repeated invocation of the 5th Amendment with anything but that...

[here is the fellows speculation]

It is highly unlikely that Lynch will move to indict Hillary, but the political effects of an FBI referral would be serious. She could not very well consult with the target of the investigation and so did the next best thing, seeking out the ex-president, delivering the bad news, probably along with assurances that regardless of the FBI conclusions, she will not move forward.

Either that or she and Bill just bumped into each other thousands of miles from Washington and New York and interrupted their busy schedules chat about his grandkids.


I'm afraid you inserted the warning "here is the fellow's speculation" at the wrong place. You should have put the warning immediately after the first sentence ends.

Almost everything after that is speculation, and pure partisan speculation at that.

< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 7/1/2016 10:14:15 AM >


_____________________________



(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 1531
RE: Hillary Probed - 7/1/2016 7:31:50 PM   
lovmuffin


Posts: 3759
Joined: 9/28/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin
Once again attacking the messenger. What is in the content that you have a problem with ?


cue vile critter parts predictable and frothing response of "factless, slobberblog, pantshitting, circle felching, and nutsucking."

and as far as lucy, that's all she ever has too---dismiss the source out of hand.



I'll give her credit for not frothing at the mouth with a whole lot of filth like an insane idiot. I've seen her come up with some good research in the past to support her arguments. I haven't seen her do it much here on this thread. But yeah, if she can't come up with anything, than dismiss the source. After all, it doesn't agree with her point of view.


< Message edited by lovmuffin -- 7/1/2016 7:34:02 PM >


_____________________________

"Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he can rob the world." Unknown

"Long hair, short hair—what's the difference once the head's blowed off." - Farmer Yassir

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 1532
RE: Hillary Probed - 7/1/2016 8:07:25 PM   
lovmuffin


Posts: 3759
Joined: 9/28/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

oh dear gawd
superb research???---townhall tipsheet section....his favourite go to choice of bilge, that and PJmedia, Newsmax or lifenews.
Has the FBI actually found evidence of wrong doing? can she (loretta lynch) hide the fbi report from the American people.
we have 70 pages of your links to "prooof" hah
I dont think any of you would find her "innocent" if she had video proof, ten thousand witnesses, or supporting DNA evidence.
You are so predictable.
Yet, you refuse to discuss your side of the crazys.
why is that????





Once again attacking the messenger. What is in the content that you have a problem with ?


SO you cant answer the questions, so you attack the messenger, (as you certainly do not add anything but bitching to any thread) ....There is NO FACT in the message that is any different than the last 70 pages of bilge posted that says so much but means NOTHING.
Maybes, probably's, possiblys, Ifs, whens or paranoia, is NOT facts.

I asked a question directly.
Has the FBI actually found evidence of wrong doing? can she (loretta lynch) hide the fbi report from the American people.
Are you still kissing trumps ring?? why wont you discuss facts????
much easier to circle jerk with the big bad boys.
and deny facts. THe messenger IS the fucking problem in this case, paranoid, delusional sad ol men.
your post is a perfect example.
how weak are you really?



Oh good grief, give It a rest. What bitching ? There have been plenty of facts on the 35 or so pages from various sources including ones that lean to the left. They would seem to support the analysis and opinion put forth. What specifically is your problem with any part of it besides killing the mesenger ?

The rest of those pages pretty much mostly include but are not necessarily limited to words from the from the following list:

Nutsucker
Nutsuckerizms
Nutsuckerwhatever
Felch
Felching
Slobber
Slobbering
Slobberblogging
Shitting
Pants shitting
Toilet licking
Piss
Pissing
Circle jerking


I'm sure we'll know very soon if the FBI actually found evidence of wrong doing?

Can she (loretta lynch) hide the fbi report from the American people? I doubt it.

Are you still kissing Hillarys ring??


_____________________________

"Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he can rob the world." Unknown

"Long hair, short hair—what's the difference once the head's blowed off." - Farmer Yassir

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 1533
RE: Hillary Probed - 7/2/2016 4:28:44 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
if people read the articles and listen to the people "in the know" there's no question Hillary broke the law. the question is going to be whether or not an indictment ensues.

and this is something that's been mentioned very briefly in some of the articles but probably hasn't gotten enough play---imagine the political pressure on the fbi, either external or internal. they really are damned if they do and damned if they don't.

to the most recent immediate story at hand, some apparently have expressed some anger over Loretta lynch's (seemingly) impromptu meeting with bill Clinton.

(in reply to lovmuffin)
Profile   Post #: 1534
RE: Hillary Probed - 7/2/2016 4:47:32 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

oh dear gawd
superb research???---townhall tipsheet section....his favourite go to choice of bilge, that and PJmedia, Newsmax or lifenews.
Has the FBI actually found evidence of wrong doing? can she (loretta lynch) hide the fbi report from the American people.
we have 70 pages of your links to "prooof" hah
I dont think any of you would find her "innocent" if she had video proof, ten thousand witnesses, or supporting DNA evidence.
You are so predictable.
Yet, you refuse to discuss your side of the crazys.
why is that????





Once again attacking the messenger. What is in the content that you have a problem with ?


SO you cant answer the questions, so you attack the messenger, (as you certainly do not add anything but bitching to any thread) ....There is NO FACT in the message that is any different than the last 70 pages of bilge posted that says so much but means NOTHING.
Maybes, probably's, possiblys, Ifs, whens or paranoia, is NOT facts.

I asked a question directly.
Has the FBI actually found evidence of wrong doing? can she (loretta lynch) hide the fbi report from the American people.
Are you still kissing trumps ring?? why wont you discuss facts????
much easier to circle jerk with the big bad boys.
and deny facts. THe messenger IS the fucking problem in this case, paranoid, delusional sad ol men.
your post is a perfect example.
how weak are you really?



Oh good grief, give It a rest. What bitching ? There have been plenty of facts on the 35 or so pages from various sources including ones that lean to the left. They would seem to support the analysis and opinion put forth. What specifically is your problem with any part of it besides killing the mesenger ?

The rest of those pages pretty much mostly include but are not necessarily limited to words from the from the following list:

Nutsucker
Nutsuckerizms
Nutsuckerwhatever
Felch
Felching
Slobber
Slobbering
Slobberblogging
Shitting
Pants shitting
Toilet licking
Piss
Pissing
Circle jerking


I'm sure we'll know very soon if the FBI actually found evidence of wrong doing?

Can she (loretta lynch) hide the fbi report from the American people? I doubt it.

Are you still kissing Hillarys ring??



Oh, give it a rest nutsucker. There have been no pertinent FACTS of any wrongdoing presented on this thread by nutsuckers.

All we get are Judge Jeannie and Judge Nappie toiletlicking, and Judicial Asswipe doing the Harry Gowdy cockgargle.

We have such asswipe as Guccifer while serving a 7 year sentence in federal prison fucking blogging any old shit on the net laid off as fact. Get a fucking life out of the toilets, boys.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to lovmuffin)
Profile   Post #: 1535
RE: Hillary Probed - 7/2/2016 5:03:30 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

if people read the articles and listen to the people "in the know" there's no question Hillary broke the law. the question is going to be whether or not an indictment ensues.

and this is something that's been mentioned very briefly in some of the articles but probably hasn't gotten enough play---imagine the political pressure on the fbi, either external or internal. they really are damned if they do and damned if they don't.

to the most recent immediate story at hand, some apparently have expressed some anger over Loretta lynch's (seemingly) impromptu meeting with bill Clinton.

The people "in the know" have not said there was a breaking of the law. The question is, did she, (and its real doubtful). some people have expressed that it might not be good PR for Lynch and Clinton to meet. They don't seem to give a fuck. Remember that Hillary was way guilty of something in the Benghazi thing, Jeebus the nutsuckers going after it 11 times was it, still cant find wrongdoing?

The fact that it will soon be July 4th is certainly a fact, and nothing to do with any guilt or innocence. Judicial Asswipe took some depositions in which the deposed told them to suck a wad of cowpiss (as I said they would do at the outset on this thread).

Anyone may depose anyone in this country, but it dont mean you have to give every shitbreather coming down the pike your life story.

Nobody in this group other than the nutsucker propagandists are going onto Maury Povitch whos your daddy segments.





_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 1536
RE: Hillary Probed - 7/2/2016 7:48:59 AM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline
Ever wonder if Billary are trying to get even for the losses of General Sir Henry Clinton, Commander-in-Chief of North America (1778-1782)?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Clinton_(British_Army_officer,_born_1730)

I have been unable to prove a direct relationship but was just thinking it might be interesting question.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 1537
RE: Hillary Probed - 7/2/2016 7:51:33 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LuyS9M8T03A

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 1538
RE: Hillary Probed - 7/2/2016 8:08:31 AM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline
that is what we need more music Thanks

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 1539
RE: Hillary Probed - 7/2/2016 8:30:53 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
A more likely relative as well. Geo Clinton and Parliament.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 1540
Page:   <<   < prev  75 76 [77] 78 79   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Hillary Probed Page: <<   < prev  75 76 [77] 78 79   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125