quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

Looks like latest breaking news is. FBI investigating Hillary emails again! That's interesting!
Ya know when McCain ran, they all cited Sarah Palin as unfit President IF McCain died.

But if Hillary got charged with criminal offense, then would Tim Caine be a good President?

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Hes got fraud trial starting tomorrow and 13 year old girl rape charges in December, then about 3000 more law suits coming up never minding the pussy grabbing lawsuits soon to come, so he will be busier at lawsuits in just his first year than obama ever was at golf his entire 8.

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Hes got fraud trial starting tomorrow and 13 year old girl rape charges in December, then about 3000 more law suits coming up never minding the pussy grabbing lawsuits soon to come, so he will be busier at lawsuits in just his first year than obama ever was at golf his entire 8.

Hasn't it been suggested that part of the reason he fancies the top job is because he can't be taken to court over civil suits while he's the President?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Hes got fraud trial starting tomorrow and 13 year old girl rape charges in December, then about 3000 more law suits coming up never minding the pussy grabbing lawsuits soon to come, so he will be busier at lawsuits in just his first year than obama ever was at golf his entire 8.

Hasn't it been suggested that part of the reason he fancies the top job is because he can't be taken to court over civil suits while he's the President?

If this still holds, he can be sued-for acts prior to his election-while in office.
http://www.nytimes.com/1997/05/28/opinion/the-limits-of-presidential-immunity.html

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

I dont think Trump U case is till november 28th:)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

I dont think Trump U case is till november 28th:)

quote:

Veteran journalist Carl Bernstein told CNN’s Brooke Baldwin that the FBI probably has a “bombshell” as the agency begins to review another batch of emails involving Hillary Clinton that were found in a separate probe looking into Anthony Weiner’s online interactions with an underage girl. That probe only involved his communications on his laptop, which was also used by his estranged wife Huma Abedin to email the former first lady. That’s what sent Washington D.C. into a frenzy yesterday; the FBI reopening their investigation into the Clinton emails. Bernstein said that 36-48 hours prior to the FBI’s announcement, he had heard chatter from sources within the national security community that something about Clinton’s emails was going to be resurrected. The hunch was that it related to the Wikileaks document dumps. That wasn’t the case. Bernstein also described the way Clinton has handled this fiasco as “indefensible” (via Real Clear Politics):

(video at the site)

quote:

Well, there's no question that the e-mails have always been the greatest threat to her candidacy for president, that her conduct in regard to the e-mails is really indefensible and if there was going to be more information that came out, it was the one thing, as I said on the air last night, actually that could really perhaps affect this election.

We don't know what this means yet except that it's a real bombshell. And it is unthinkable that the Director of the FBI would take this action lightly, that he would put this letter forth to the Congress of the United States saying there is more information out there about classified e-mails and call it to the attention of congress unless it was something requiring serious investigation. So that's where we are...

Is it a certainty that we won't learn before the election? I'm not sure it's a certainty we won't learn before the election.

One thing is, it's possible that Hillary Clinton might want to on her own initiative talk to the FBI and find out what she can, and if she chooses to let the American people know what she thinks or knows is going on. People need to hear from her...

Last night, Clinton decided to put the burden of responsibility on the FBI to release more details on their renewed investigation that will review these emails. Make a note: none of these emails were from her. Still, there are thousands of emails to be reviewed on the Weiner/Abedin computer, which could take us way past Election Day. This isn’t going to be a quick review. Friends and allies of Clinton went ballistic over the news, accusing the FBI of gross innuendo by merely saying the case was reopened 11 days from Election Day. Then again, if Comey had kept his mouth shut and it was revealed that the FBI was revealing new emails without telling the public says after the election, the backlash would be significant. Either way, this decision from the FBI was going to be politicized. It’s a damned if you do, damned if you don’t scenario. CNN’s David Gergen agreed that Comey should have informed the public about this latest development into Clinton’s emails, though he added that the letter Comey sent to Congress didn’t offer details. He added that the FBI should have divulged more details rather than let this thing dangle in front of us without further clarification.

Well, if there is a bombshell in these communications, we’ll have to wait a bit before to see what it is if it even exists at all.

quote:

Early Friday evening Democrat Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton held an unplanned press conference in Iowa to address FBI Director James Comey's announcement the criminal investigation surrounding her email practices has been reopened.

Comey sent a letter to relevant Committee chairman and ranking members Friday stating that additional documents had been found (news reports later confirmed the new information about Clinton's server came through the FBI's investigation of Anthony Weiner, top aide Huma Abedin's ex-husband, for sexual misconduct with a minor) and the case had been reopened.

When answering questions from reporters Clinton claimed Comey only sent the letter to Republican lawmakers, when in fact he sent it to Republican and Democrat lawmakers. Clinton said she had seen the letter, which clearly shows it was sent to lawmakers in both parties on Capitol Hill.



In fact Democrat Senator Feinstein, who was one of the recipients of the letter, responded to Comey's decision forcefully.

Clinton clearly made the false statement in an effort to paint Comey's decision to reopen the investigation as purely political, rather than based on new findings of additional email evidence. According to a number of reports, the new evidence found and referred to by Comey in the letter consists of thousands of pages on multiple devices.

quote:

Government watchdog Judicial Watch has issued a Freedom of Information Act Lawsuit against the FBI demanding the release of documents surrounding the secret July meeting between former President Bill Clinton and Attorney General Loretta Lynch. The meeting took place on Lynch's private plane at Sky Harbor Airport in Phoenix and lasted for more than 30 minutes.

The lawsuit includes a demand for FBI “302” documents, which are reports of FBI investigation interviews. The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:16-cv-02046).

On June 29, 2016, Attorney General Loretta Lynch is reported to have met privately with former President Bill Clinton on board a parked private plane at Sky Harbor International Airport in Phoenix, Arizona. The meeting occurred during the then-ongoing investigation of Mrs. Clinton's email server, and mere hours before the Benghazi report was released publicly involving both Mrs. Clinton and the Obama administration. Judicial Watch filed a request on June 30 that the U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General investigate that meeting.

That secret meeting, which was first revealed by a local reporter, came just days before Director James Comey announced former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would not face indictment after a year long criminal investigation into her mishandling of classified information and use of an unsecured private email server to conduct all of her State Department business. Comey cited a lack of action by DOJ prosecutors to take on the case as the reason for the non-indictment.

"FBI Director James Comey’s promise to the American people of transparency about the FBI’s investigation of Clinton was an empty promise – otherwise we wouldn’t be in federal court seeking this information,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton released in a statement. “An air of corruption surrounds the FBI/Justice Department investigation of Hillary Clinton and so, through this lawsuit, Judicial Watch is investigating the investigators.”

FBI agents reportedly told the New York Post they believe some kind of deal was struck during the meeting between Clinton and Lynch.

Sources said they had never heard of the “Case Briefing Acknowledgment” form being used before, although all agents must initially sign nondisclosure agreements to obtain security clearance.

“This is very, very unusual. I’ve never signed one, never circulated one to others,” said one retired FBI chief.

Meanwhile, FBI agents expressed their “disappointment” over FBI Director James Comey’s decision not to recommend charges against Clinton, sources close to the matter told The Post.

“FBI agents believe there was an inside deal put in place after the Loretta Lynch/Bill Clinton tarmac meeting,” said one source.