Kree -> RE: contracts, necessary or not? (7/17/2006 9:01:08 PM)
|
I dont see the necessity of a formal contract to define a relationship. As one person posted in this thread, someone wanted a contract, then walked away from it. On another thread, we have seen where someone set up a contract and tries to use it to force his submissive into compliance instead of listening to her and working through problems. A contract has no validity if both arent in agreement and if it has no defined method of negotiation. If I did wish to create a contract, I would want it set up to expire in 3-6 months and then need to be re-written. Perhaps the second try would need a re-write in 12 months. I do not care how long two people have known each other or lhow long they have been together, when they move under the same roof, real life brings unforseen issues that a contract can not anticipate. Time brings unforseen issues. I would not call it a contract or anything formal, but some type of agreement that addresses the basic understanding between two people might have value. It is NOT the end all/be all for defining a relationship, but rather a place where two people can return to when the relationship drifts away from its beginnings. By looking at the beginning, people can examine where they began and look at where they have gone. Often, it is those basic things that get lost and confused. By writing those down as vows, an agreement, or pick a name for it, people can return to a place where they were both content with the relationship and work together to inprove it.
|
|
|
|