I would say she consented to have sex with a PERSON, the same person who fucked her with her consent, several times. If a guy wouldn't get it up and would use a dildo, it wouldn't be assault.
If he used a dildo without her consent, that would also be assault.
Yes it is weird, but the "victim" isn't THAT victimized, she was nor raped, apparently the sex was fairly good since she kept on doing it, she went and fucked somebody off Facebook willingly, somebody she never met in daylight and her whole problem is that it wasn't a real flesh dick but a plastic one?
Who are you to judge how "victimized" someone is?
So are you in favour of jailing all the guys who pretend they are single and looking for a relationship but are not? Because the women also consented to have sex with somebody who used deceit.
Nope, not at all. I don't see it as remotely the same.
Oh so men can use dildos on women, can misrepresent themselves and it's completely different...
There was no assault, look, if you get a BJ in a dark alley and the person is TV, you think you got a case? I don't think so, you consented to a sexual act, she consented to a sexual act.
Apparently I have braincells enough to judge that it's a bad idea to have sex with random strangers off FB and then play the victim if an act I consented to was not done with a real dick but a plastic one. FFS, in that case how about we start suing if the size wasn't what we wanted to...
Sorry, if you are stupid enough AGREE to get fucked in a dark room by a stranger, a plastic dick should be the last of your concerns, the most pressing concerns in any sane person would be HIV, Hep, syphilis, chlamydia. gonorrhoea.
Who am I to judge? One of the tax payers who pays for this frivolous law suit, brought on by some bitch in heat who went into a dark room, put a blindfold on, wanted to get fucked, got fucked and then complains that the dick was plastic and not flesh.
There are 10 kinds of people who understand binary
Those who do and those who don't!