respectmen
Posts: 2042
Joined: 8/28/2015
Status: offline
|
As to what LadyConstanze and Lucylastic are doing, like most or all feminists, somewhere down the track in discussion they will come up with the "what are you doing about it" tacitc every time a male raises male issues.
For starters, thinking about all the hypocrisy behind this is a cack session. But what I want to point out first is the reason why feminists do this. Feminists do this because they simply want to shift the goalpost. They want to shift the focus of "men have problems too" away from the spotlight and shift the goalpost in making the topic about shaming the man who raised the said issue. In other words, turn the discussion and make it about the man who raised the issue instead of keeping the discussion about what the man actually said. That way, all focus and consideration for male issues gets buried in the sand, or in other words, beneath all the following posts of "what are you doing about it" blah blah blah. So that way, it makes the finger point at the man who raised the issue instead of the issue it's self.
What feminists are actually doing when this happens is contradicting the premise that they claim they want something done about the said issue. If they did actually want something done about the issue, they wouldn't want to turn the discussion and make it about the man all the time instead of being interested in what the man actually said.
So let's get to the typical feminist hypocrisy points with this problem.
Most feminists don't do anything to help solve female issues. They only talk about it, such like in forums. So why don't we see other feminists shouting at them and telling them to stop talking about female issues and do something about it? Where are the feminists making it personal about the woman who raised the issue instead of leaving the goalpost on the said issue?
So as it seems, there is one standard (a positive standard) when a female complains about women's issues. Then there is another standard (a negative standard) when a male complains about men's issues. In this case, a male is held accountable and responsible for a problem just for mentioning it, and people will try to intimidate him based on that. On the other hand, a female isn't held accountable and responsible for a problem just for mentioning it, as people wont try to intimidate her based on them same expectations placed on men.
When feminists do this, they seriously contradict their claim on being about "equality".
What are feminists doing about it (the male problem)? Another hypocrisy point. Why criticise another for not doing something about it when you aren't yourself? As feminists imagine they are on this high moral tower above everyone else, and know more about equality than anyone else, and act like the experts on how to solve gender issues, how come they do so little or nothing for male issues?
That said, even an issue that both genders face. Domestic violence for example. Sorry to say, but it's one of the lamest excuses in the world to say that there is less empathy, consideration, and support for male victims because there are simply less male victims. This is no better than and just as backward to say that as there are less blacks than whites in the population of a western country, this results to less black DV victims compared to white DV victims. Therefore, we should have less empathy, consideration, and support, for black victims. Even that they feel pain too. They feel emotions too. They are human too. When any human regardless of gender or race faces this, they deserve the same, equal, support compared to anyone else who is a different gender or race.
People are human first, gender or race second. ALL humans deserve equal support. There is no excuse around it.
Feminists totally fucking fail at giving men equal support. While on the other hand, claim that they are all about equality. Last time I checked, equality comes with equal support to anyone regardless of gender or race. Human first, gender and race second.
Again, when feminists do this, they seriously contradict their claim on being about "equality".
All of that said, let's get to what feminists are expecting the men to do when they tell them to "do something about it".
For example, as Lucy has raised numerous times, she got shitty that I didn't want to run a website on awareness of male DV.
So why didn't I? Because I'm not stupid and delusional like Lucy. As if running a website is going to stop the problem of women committing DV against men. That is a laugh. There are also magical fairies in Lucy's world. Anyway, also, there is already plenty of websites out there that raise awareness for male DV. That alone makes it very pointless if I did the exact same. To add, I think raising awareness about DV on men in spaces like this would get a far bigger audience than a dedicated website to that problem.
It would be nice if feminists didn't get their claws into all government funding with these types of social issues. If feminists didn't, men would be having equal support as we speak. For this, when men have such problems, they are on their own. When women have such problems, government funding is on their side. Oh someone forgot about equality when this started happening. It's because the governments listen to feminist groups but no other special interest gender groups.
95.3% of men felt domestic violence agencies were anti-male...40% reported being accused of perpetrating DV when seeking help at said agencies.
http://wordpress.clarku.edu/dhines/files/2012/01/Douglas-Hines-2011-helpseeking-experiences-of-male-victims.pdf
But as always, feminists prefer to point the finger at the man who raises the male issue on DV instead of pointing the finger at the people who are actually causing the problem.
Naughty feminist hypocrites!
|
RE: Feminists Condone PC Rape - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread