RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Entering U.S. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


kdsub -> RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Entering U.S. (1/24/2016 9:39:27 PM)

vince...put yourself in the shoes of Harry Truman... If given a choice of using a weapon that would save the lives of thousands of American men and women... or... trying to explain to American mothers and fathers why he put the lives of those that attacked us above the lives of their children. Which choice would you make? He really had no choice but to use it...and bless him for it.

People who try to blame America and the US government for the use of the atomic bomb just not thinking clearly. Myself it was a blessing that we used the bomb... give me the lever to drop it and I'd pull it myself and be glad for it... Not that I enjoy killing but I believe that without the horror seen and recorded for future generations we would have already destroyed ourselves in a nuclear holocaust. The destruction of a nuclear device must be seen to be believed....and sadly our enemies had to pay the price for their aggression. The example of the horror may have saved the earth.

Butch




Tkman117 -> RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Entering U.S. (1/25/2016 5:18:33 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub
sadly our enemies had to pay the price for their aggression.

Butch


After all the aggression caused by the USA, maybe it should be your turn to know what it feels like to be nuked? After all, without US intervention, the Middle East wouldn't be the shit hole it is today, and many coups in South America would have never occured, just to name a few examples.[8|]




kdsub -> RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Entering U.S. (1/25/2016 9:01:30 AM)

Can I have a peek in your crystal ball?

Butch




DominantWrestler -> RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Entering U.S. (1/25/2016 12:29:30 PM)

The atomic bomb was initially built in response to Germany. Japan had no nuclear ambitions to my knowledge. Nobel Prize winner Richard Feynman regretted not walking away from the project after Germany fell. It really is a tough question. And who knows whether it would have sprung up somewhere and somewhen else in time




Phydeaux -> RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Entering U.S. (1/25/2016 3:12:28 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

one is an unsourced and vague 'reputation' by a nutsucker. now we simply need to get a sourced factual number of muslim resultant killings, and then we need to compare them to a sourced factual number of christians resultant killings, and we will figure out that the 2 million (since what? recorded history?) would not come very close to just the number of jews done in by christians in the WW2 timeframe alone.

The point of whatever the nutsucker point is being far afield from anything.


Ignorant ramblings once again.

Hitler was not a christian.

Go ahead and compare muslim and christian killings. Go ahead and tell me the number of times a christian army has created a mounted of skulls that numbered more than a million people.

The muslim conquest of india involved more than 80 million deaths. The muslim slave trade from africa killed more than 100 million people.

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/05/the_greatest_murder_machine_in_history.html




Phydeaux -> RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Entering U.S. (1/25/2016 3:33:30 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

Thuggee or tuggee (Hindi: Nepali ठग्गी ṭhagī; Urdu: ٹھگ‎; Sanskrit: sthaga; Sindhi: ٺوڳي، ٺڳ‎; Kannada: ಠಕ್ಕ thakka) refers to the acts of Thugs, an organised gang of professional robbers and murderers.


Thuggees were apparently both Muslim and Hindu, Phydeaux. But what makes your observation so depressingly pisspoor is the fact that so many robbers and murderers, throughout the centuries, have been Christian.

It's beyond brainlessly prejudiced, Phydeaux - it really is. You can understand, surely, why nobody who advances an argument that smacks of such a prejudice is going to be taken seriously?


By which you completely miss the point. Certainly, some christians have been thieves and murderers.

But show me a christian cult designed to infiltrate travellers and murder them. A cult that persisted for 500 years.

Or alternatively, show me a christian kingdom that glorified murder and assassination as a way to rule.

Yet both of these things happened in muslim societies. You persist in putting forth the argument that christians and muslims are the same - in the face of overwhelming evidence that they are not.





Phydeaux -> RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Entering U.S. (1/25/2016 3:49:19 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

and given that the general consensus at the time was that an invasion of the Japanese homeland would cost millions of lives, one wonders what the point of the comment was?
General consensus? How do you know? It was a highly secret operation. The allies could have alternatively formed a blockade around the Japanese islands. That would have had the same result. The purpose was to show that using the term "thugs" to describe the actions of killers over the course of 500 years loses any significance when compared to what the United States industrial war machine can do in a snip of time. Were we justified in using nuclear weapons on innocent civilians? The question remains open, I think. Do we really know the motives of the decision makers and advisors? I don't know.



Ignorant once again.

The plans for the invasion of Japan were declassified years ago. Look up operation downfall.

The original plans called for the us to invade with 9-12 divisions. However, the japanese recalled divisions from manchuria and raised multiple new divisions.
In point of fact - the japanese had 65 divisions - which greatly exceed the number of us divisions.

In addition to that, the japanese had the Patriotic Citizens Fighting Corp.

In okinawa, where the American's outnumbered the japanese, the US nonetheless took 30% casualties. For mainland japan, The US was not able to have the 3:1 advantage that amphibious landings require - the ratio would have been close to 1:1, which would have been a disaster.

Additionally, the japanese had more than 10,000 kamikaze planes prepped. Using the same ratio of success as had been achieved in okinawa -1 in 6- over 400 ships would have been sunk.

US casualty estimates were 500,000 men for the first 90 days.
Secretary of War Henry Stimson's estimate for US casualties were 1.7 - 4 million American casualties with 400-800K deaths, and 5-10 million japanese casualities.

As for a "blockade". This was a plan put forward by the navy - but the net cost was even higher. As for the attitudes and thoughts of our leaders - these are actually pretty well documented in the discussion and plans for the war.


http://www.upa.pdx.edu/IMS/currentprojects/TAHv3/Content/PDFs/Operation_Downfall.pdf


The bottom line: The japanese were give an ultimatum calling for them to surrender after the firebombing campaign. They refused. They were called to surrender before the nuclear bombing - they refused. They were called to surrender after the first nuclear bombing - they refused.

Your assertions to the contrary - there is no doubt that the use of nuclear bombs reduced american and japanese casualties tremendously.






kdsub -> RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Entering U.S. (1/25/2016 3:53:24 PM)

What do you think? As i said the invasion of Japan would kill thousands of American soldiers... there is not doubt there. Many estimates claim the invasion of Japan would have killed over a million Japanese so the use of the bomb saved lives on both sides. The benefit besides saving lives on both sides was the deterrent that saved even more lives up to today.

Butch




Phydeaux -> RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Entering U.S. (1/25/2016 3:54:02 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Tkman117

After all, without US intervention, the Middle East wouldn't be the shit hole it is today,


Oh really?

So when the British / French drew up the sikes-pikot plan - somehow that had to do with us?

Or when russian made proxy states of egypt,.. we were at fault?

Or when the US kicked britain and france out of the canal zone - that was us making the middle ease worse.

Or us brokering the Sadat/Begin peace treaty?

So tell me, exactly why the fuck you think the middle east wouldn't be a shit hole....oh clueless wonder...




mnottertail -> RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Entering U.S. (1/26/2016 8:24:05 AM)

Oh, maybe if we wouldnt have propped up ruthless dictators in Iran, in Iraq, Libya, strongarmed Egypt and Syria, backed racist regimes in Israel, sided with Turkey, Lebanon, and Saudi Arabia.

if we would have been honest and respectful allies of Jordan under King Hussein. And we only kicked Britain out and became the middle eastern meddlers for their oil.




thishereboi -> RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Entering U.S. (1/27/2016 2:22:12 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Tkman117


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub
sadly our enemies had to pay the price for their aggression.

Butch


After all the aggression caused by the USA, maybe it should be your turn to know what it feels like to be nuked? After all, without US intervention, the Middle East wouldn't be the shit hole it is today, and many coups in South America would have never occured, just to name a few examples.[8|]



That's right TKboy, the Japanese were a peace loving group before we pissed them off and forced them to start WW2. Thanks for setting us straight [8|]




Politesub53 -> RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Entering U.S. (1/27/2016 4:18:35 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: Tkman117

After all, without US intervention, the Middle East wouldn't be the shit hole it is today,


Oh really?

So when the British / French drew up the sikes-pikot plan - somehow that had to do with us?

Or when russian made proxy states of egypt,.. we were at fault?

Or when the US kicked britain and france out of the canal zone - that was us making the middle ease worse.

Or us brokering the Sadat/Begin peace treaty?

So tell me, exactly why the fuck you think the middle east wouldn't be a shit hole....oh clueless wonder...



Lmao @ your continued stupidity.

Yep, the situation in the middle east has fuck all to do with Bush, or oil, or US foreign policy. Clueless wonder indeed.[8|]




PeonForHer -> RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Entering U.S. (1/27/2016 4:25:33 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: Tkman117


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub
sadly our enemies had to pay the price for their aggression.

Butch


After all the aggression caused by the USA, maybe it should be your turn to know what it feels like to be nuked? After all, without US intervention, the Middle East wouldn't be the shit hole it is today, and many coups in South America would have never occured, just to name a few examples.[8|]



That's right TKboy, the Japanese were a peace loving group before we pissed them off and forced them to start WW2. Thanks for setting us straight [8|]



Japan isn't in the Middle East and it didn't start WW2, THB.





Lucylastic -> RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Entering U.S. (1/27/2016 4:40:57 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

Thuggee or tuggee (Hindi: Nepali ठग्गी ṭhagī; Urdu: ٹھگ‎; Sanskrit: sthaga; Sindhi: ٺوڳي، ٺڳ‎; Kannada: ಠಕ್ಕ thakka) refers to the acts of Thugs, an organised gang of professional robbers and murderers.


Thuggees were apparently both Muslim and Hindu, Phydeaux. But what makes your observation so depressingly pisspoor is the fact that so many robbers and murderers, throughout the centuries, have been Christian.

It's beyond brainlessly prejudiced, Phydeaux - it really is. You can understand, surely, why nobody who advances an argument that smacks of such a prejudice is going to be taken seriously?


By which you completely miss the point. Certainly, some christians have been thieves and murderers.

But show me a christian cult designed to infiltrate travellers and murder them. A cult that persisted for 500 years.

Or alternatively, show me a christian kingdom that glorified murder and assassination as a way to rule.

Yet both of these things happened in muslim societies. You persist in putting forth the argument that christians and muslims are the same - in the face of overwhelming evidence that they are not.




how many heathens?




Phydeaux -> RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Entering U.S. (1/28/2016 7:11:11 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: Tkman117

After all, without US intervention, the Middle East wouldn't be the shit hole it is today,


Oh really?

So when the British / French drew up the sikes-pikot plan - somehow that had to do with us?

Or when russian made proxy states of egypt,.. we were at fault?

Or when the US kicked britain and france out of the canal zone - that was us making the middle ease worse.

Or us brokering the Sadat/Begin peace treaty?

So tell me, exactly why the fuck you think the middle east wouldn't be a shit hole....oh clueless wonder...



Lmao @ your continued stupidity.

Yep, the situation in the middle east has fuck all to do with Bush, or oil, or US foreign policy. Clueless wonder indeed.[8|]



Show me, fuckwad, where I said that US - or Bristish policy wasn't affected by oil. Oh right never said it. What the fuck I said was - show me that the middle east wouldn't be a shit hole.

Since we're toting up blame - your country - asshole - has a great deal more to be remorseful for than the US does. Britain, being, you know the colonial power in charge of the area;

How many times has the US had a colony in Egypt, Palestine, ..oh right that would be none.

As for oil.
Hey fuckwad.. we import oil from more than 80 countries. Opec provides in total roughly 1/4 of us imports, half of that from Saudi Arabia. We've boosted Iraq imports to help its economy recover - but under sadam hussein the us generally got less than 4% of its oil from Iraq.

But you know who gets a lot more oil from Iraq/Iran/Saudi Arabia - well that would be the EU. So shut your fucking mouth asswipe.




Lucylastic -> RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Entering U.S. (1/28/2016 7:27:37 AM)

awwwwww hes losing it...
*grabs popcorn*




freedomdwarf1 -> RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Entering U.S. (1/28/2016 8:25:21 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
By which you completely miss the point. Certainly, some christians have been thieves and murderers.

I think everyone would acknowledge that the Knights Templar were indeed a bunch of murdering bastards acting in the name of religion.
But they weren't the only ones.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
But show me a christian cult designed to infiltrate travellers and murder them. A cult that persisted for 500 years.

Let's see..... Not counting religious wars -

Listed are only events that solely occurred on command of church authorities or were committed in the name of Christianity. (List incomplete)
Ancient Pagans
As soon as Christianity was legal (315), more and more pagan temples were destroyed by Christian mob. Pagan priests were killed.
Between 315 and 6th century thousands of pagan believers were slain.
Examples of destroyed Temples: the Sanctuary of Aesculap in Aegaea, the Temple of Aphrodite in Golgatha, Aphaka in Lebanon, the Heliopolis.
Christian priests such as Mark of Arethusa or Cyrill of Heliopolis were famous as "temple destroyer." [DA468]
Pagan services became punishable by death in 356. [DA468]
Christian Emperor Theodosius (408-450) even had children executed, because they had been playing with remains of pagan statues. [DA469]
According to Christian chroniclers he "followed meticulously all Christian teachings..."
In 6th century pagans were declared void of all rights.
In the early fourth century the philosopher Sopatros was executed on demand of Christian authorities. [DA466]
The world famous female philosopher Hypatia of Alexandria was torn to pieces with glass fragments by a hysterical Christian mob led by a Christian minister named Peter, in a church, in 415.
[DO19-25]

Mission
Emperor Karl (Charlemagne) in 782 had 4500 Saxons, unwilling to convert to Christianity, beheaded. [DO30]
Peasants of Steding (Germany) unwilling to pay suffocating church taxes: between 5,000 and 11,000 men, women and children slain 5/27/1234 near Altenesch/Germany. [WW223]
Battle of Belgrad 1456: 80,000 Turks slaughtered. [DO235]
15th century Poland: 1019 churches and 17987 villages plundered by Knights of the Order. Victims unknown. [DO30]
16th and 17th century Ireland. English troops "pacified and civilized" Ireland, where only Gaelic "wild Irish", "unreasonable beasts lived without any knowledge of God or good manners, in common of their goods, cattle, women, children and every other thing." One of the more successful soldiers, a certain Humphrey Gilbert, half-brother of Sir Walter Raleigh, ordered that "the heddes of all those (of what sort soever thei were) which were killed in the daie, should be cutte off from their bodies... and should bee laied on the ground by eche side of the waie", which effort to civilize the Irish indeed caused "greate terrour to the people when thei sawe the heddes of their dedde fathers, brothers, children, kinsfolke, and freinds on the grounde".
Tens of thousands of Gaelic Irish fell victim to the carnage. [SH99, 225]

Crusades (1095-1291)
First Crusade: 1095 on command of pope Urban II. [WW11-41]
Semlin/Hungary 6/24/96 thousands slain. Wieselburg/Hungary 6/12/96 thousands. [WW23]
9/9/96-9/26/96 Nikaia, Xerigordon (then turkish), thousands respectively. [WW25-27]
Until Jan 1098 a total of 40 capital cities and 200 castles conquered (number of slain unknown) [WW30]
after 6/3/98 Antiochia (then turkish) conquered, between 10,000 and 60,000 slain. 6/28/98 100,000 Turks (incl. women & children) killed. [WW32-35]
Here the Christians "did no other harm to the women found in [the enemy's] tents—save that they ran their lances through their bellies," according to Christian chronicler Fulcher of Chartres. [EC60]
Marra (Maraat an-numan) 12/11/98 thousands killed. Because of the subsequent famine "the already stinking corpses of the enemies were eaten by the Christians" said chronicler Albert Aquensis. [WW36]
Jerusalem conquered 7/15/1099 more than 60,000 victims (jewish, muslim, men, women, children). [WW37-40]
(In the words of one witness: "there [in front of Solomon's temple] was such a carnage that our people were wading ankle-deep in the blood of our foes", and after that "happily and crying for joy our people marched to our Saviour's tomb, to honour it and to pay off our debt of gratitude")
The Archbishop of Tyre, eye-witness, wrote: "It was impossible to look upon the vast numbers of the slain without horror; everywhere lay fragments of human bodies, and the very ground was covered with the blood of the slain. It was not alone the spectacle of headless bodies and mutilated limbs strewn in all directions that roused the horror of all who looked upon them. Still more dreadful was it to gaze upon the victors themselves, dripping with blood from head to foot, an ominous sight which brought terror to all who met them. It is reported that within the Temple enclosure alone about ten thousand infidels perished." [TG79]
Christian chronicler Eckehard of Aura noted that "even the following summer in all of palestine the air was polluted by the stench of decomposition". One million victims of the first crusade alone. [WW41]
Battle of Askalon, 8/12/1099. 200,000 heathens slaughtered "in the name of Our Lord Jesus Christ". [WW45]
Fourth crusade: 4/12/1204 Constantinople sacked, number of victims unknown, numerous thousands, many of them Christian. [WW141-148]
Rest of Crusades in less detail: until the fall of Akkon 1291 probably 20 million victims (in the Holy land and Arab/Turkish areas alone). [WW224]

Note: All figures according to contemporary (Christian) chroniclers.

Heretics
Already in 385 C.E. the first Christians, the Spanish Priscillianus and six followers, were beheaded for heresy in Trier/Germany [DO26]
Manichaean heresy: a crypto-Christian sect decent enough to practice birth control (and thus not as irresponsible as faithful Catholics) was exterminated in huge campaigns all over the Roman empire between 372 C.E. and 444 C.E. Numerous thousands of victims. [NC]
Albigensians: the first Crusade intended to slay other Christians. [DO29]
The Albigensians...viewed themselves as good Christians, but would not accept roman Catholic rule, and taxes, and prohibition of birth control. [NC]
Begin of violence: on command of pope Innocent III (greatest single pre-nazi mass murderer) in 1209. Bezirs (today France) 7/22/1209 destroyed, all the inhabitants were slaughtered. Victims (including Catholics refusing to turn over their heretic neighbours and friends) 20,000-70,000. [WW179-181]
Carcassonne 8/15/1209, thousands slain. Other cities followed. [WW181]
subsequent 20 years of war until nearly all Cathars (probably half the population of the Languedoc, today southern France) were exterminated. [WW183]
After the war ended (1229) the Inquisition was founded 1232 to search and destroy surviving/hiding heretics. Last Cathars burned at the stake 1324. [WW183]
Estimated one million victims (cathar heresy alone), [WW183]
Other heresies: Waldensians, Paulikians, Runcarians, Josephites, and many others. Most of these sects exterminated, (I believe some Waldensians live today, yet they had to endure 600 years of persecution) I estimate at least hundred thousand victims (including the Spanish inquisition but excluding victims in the New World).
Spanish Inquisitor Torquemada alone allegedly responsible for 10,220 burnings. [DO28]
John Huss, a critic of papal infallibility and indulgences, was burned at the stake in 1415. [LI475-522]
University professor B.Hubmaier burned at the stake 1538 in Vienna. [DO59]
Giordano Bruno, Dominican monk, after having been incarcerated for seven years, was burned at the stake for heresy on the Campo dei Fiori (Rome) on 2/17/1600.

Witches
from the beginning of Christianity to 1484 probably more than several thousand.
in the era of witch hunting (1484-1750) according to modern scholars several hundred thousand (about 80% female) burned at the stake or hanged. [WV]

incomplete list of documented cases: The Burning of Witches - A Chronicle of the Burning Times

Source: Truth Be Known

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
Or alternatively, show me a christian kingdom that glorified murder and assassination as a way to rule.

From the same source as above -
>> 17th century: Catholics sack the city of Magdeburg/Germany: roughly 30,000 Protestants were slain. "In a single church fifty women were found beheaded," reported poet Friedrich Schiller, "and infants still sucking the breasts of their lifeless mothers." [SH191]
>> 17th century 30 years' war (Catholic vs. Protestant): at least 40% of population decimated, mostly in Germany. [DO31-32]

From Wiki: The Actes and Monuments, popularly known as Foxe's Book of Martyrs, is a work of Protestant history and martyrology by John Foxe, first published in English in 1563 by John Day. It includes a polemical account of the sufferings of Protestants under the Catholic Church, with particular emphasis on England and Scotland.

The last I heard, both Protestant AND Catholic faiths have been evident for a lot more than 500 years and also still in strong existence today.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
Yet both of these things happened in muslim societies. You persist in putting forth the argument that christians and muslims are the same - in the face of overwhelming evidence that they are not.

I agree with this completely.




bounty44 -> RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Entering U.S. (1/28/2016 8:43:00 AM)

have said this before, and it bears repeating:

much of the heinousness done in the name of Christianity in times past had to do with the unholy marriage of church and state and the influence of the state on the church, or vice versa.

more importantly, when Christians kill seemingly "indiscriminately" (as opposed to in self defense, or in the context of war) they are not acting consistent with the tenets of their faith. the same cannot be said for islam.

and given that, its more than likely that the people doing the actual killing in some, if not most cases, were not themselves Christians.

while im here---im extremely skeptical of the number into the hundreds of thousands concerning witch burning.

the website itself says:"The total number of victims was probably between 50,000 and 100,000"

im still skeptical. the website provided does not really document anything nor are any of its claims specifically referenced.

I cannot watch video, so I cant speak to the video link provided, but this link: http://hayesfam.bravehost.com/ ...goes nowhere.

the cornell link merely takes you to a front page where the very large cornell collection is described. there is no information there specific to what the website is claiming.

in those regards, the websites extremely poor and wouldn't pass muster at a high school level.

at the same time, ive got three Christian history books---two for the church at large and one for north America. ~1800 pages of people, places and things and the only mention of witches are the salem trials in the north American text, wherein 20 people were killed.

im hard pressed to believe if the church had burned/hung hundreds of thousands of suspected witches, or even just many thousands for that matter, that that wouldn't appear in classically used texts.

as for the rest of the material at "truth be known"---id have to look more carefully.




mnottertail -> RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Entering U.S. (1/28/2016 8:53:11 AM)

and let me repeat this because it bears repeating, those killing in the name of islam are not islamic.




freedomdwarf1 -> RE: Donald Trump Calls for Barring Muslims From Entering U.S. (1/28/2016 8:54:29 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
have said this before, and it bears repeating:

much of the heinousness done in the name of Christianity in times past had to do with the unholy marriage of church and state and the influence of the state on the church, or vice versa.

more importantly, when Christians kill seemingly "indiscriminately" (as opposed to in self defense, or in the context of war) they are not acting consistent with the tenets of their faith. the same cannot be said for islam.

Which is why most of the christian world has indeed separated the "state" from the "church" for law-making.
It started here when our 'enry told the pope to go swivel and setup the 'Church of England' loosely based on the Lutherans of Germany.

The most notable exceptions are the US and Islamic nations.





Page: <<   < prev  14 15 [16] 17 18   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
6.298828E-02