quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

Why is this shit still being debated?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

I'm not sure what your point is here. Certainly climate changes.

If you want to debate other topics - such as pesticides, herbicides, I am happy to do so. If you wish to make the argument that we should do a better job of sheparding the planet - I agree with you. [Surprise!]
I don't see the point of doing it in this thread, which is specifically to debate the the IPCC AGW global warming.

quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

I'm not sure what your point is here. Certainly climate changes.

If you want to debate other topics - such as pesticides, herbicides, I am happy to do so. If you wish to make the argument that we should do a better job of sheparding the planet - I agree with you. [Surprise!]
I don't see the point of doing it in this thread, which is specifically to debate the the IPCC AGW global warming.

Its something people & companies should be doing anyway, but it seems with capitalism here it takes govt intervention to force that on us.. (& usually with govt intervention, it never goes far enough soon enough).. and your first post in this thread was about Kerry (the moron), not specifically about the IPCC until you changed the subject to that (from Kerry).. so I changed the subject to what we should be doing to not squander the worlds health and resources.. threads can and do change, ya know.. they dont just always go in the direction you want.. just sayin'...

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

BTW there at at last count, about 6 viable cold fusion reactors being dev. ask we write, all financed by venture capital for displacement of current fission nuke plants. These are quite purposefully going beyond just research but to practical applications.

Also, there is currently a cold fusion D-D (deuterium-deuterium) desk top reactor being dev. as we write that in 5 years could be viable energy source for the home. The fuel source is hydrogen and the by-product is hydrogen.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

BTW there at at last count, about 6 viable cold fusion reactors being dev. ask we write, all financed by venture capital for displacement of current fission nuke plants. These are quite purposefully going beyond just research but to practical applications.

Also, there is currently a cold fusion D-D (deuterium-deuterium) desk top reactor being dev. as we write that in 5 years could be viable energy source for the home. The fuel source is hydrogen and the by-product is hydrogen.

Yeah, I'm actually think the private, small fusion reactors will have more efficiency that they huge government grants/ programs.
Several of these designs have made really innovative progress.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

LOL, which make me off by an order of 10% and you by an order of 250%. and no, it is 997.903 grams. Numbers are important.

Thanks, for pointing out your innumeracy.

I have pointed out the risk in blowing a fusion plant. You have given us foolish hallucinations, said they were not nuke, and hand us some asswipe about 2.2 pounds of material a day from some unreliable source that it is not in our purview to know, and I see no numbers like that in the commercial materials use. (which are not included, since we still await your unlearned citations) Dont dig your hole any deeper my untutored friend.

http://www.ccfe.ac.uk/fusion_power.aspx
https://www.euro-fusion.org/faq/new-how-much-power-is-needed-to-start-the-reactor-and-to-keep-it-working/

Now, again, there are doubts that such a reactor is in the near offing, and while the neutrons would be less than the first generation reactors (not commercially viable) they still would be great. tell you what, you carry around a seconds worth of that reaction in your pocket. You will die quicker than Mme. Curie did carrying around radium.

But who gives a fuck, we have the risk today, a big one, we fiddle while Rome burns, its the nutsuckers. And while not nearly as dangerous as fission reactors, they are fucking dangerous. Bomb it and break it, and it will kill thousands.


You say only a few seconds of halocaust is of no concern.

I have never said that I was comparing the two, that is your pure strawman nutsuckerism. I never said you said a fucking thing about coal plants, and there can be no disagreement that a fission plant would be more devastating than a fusion plant, but then a million ton atomic bomb is always more devastating than a 1 ton atomic bomb. You are jacking off with words you are poorly constructing to save yourself from saying moronic shit.

http://www.instructables.com/id/Build-A-Fusion-Reactor/
here you go, though, build one, this is just fuck around, you will notice that they have more than drywall and paper stopping the excited neutrons from getting out, gee, I wonder why? I was told by an untutored innumerate that it was not dangerous, not a nuke and all sorts of other ignorant shit.

Here is a definition that meets the necessary and sufficient conditions of a neutron bomb.

A neutron bomb, officially termed one type of Enhanced Radiation Weapon (ERW), is a low yield thermonuclear weapon in which a burst of neutrons generated by a nuclear fusion reaction is intentionally allowed to escape the weapon, rather than being absorbed by its other components.
Thats all.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

Why is this shit still being debated?

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

LOL, which make me off by an order of 10% and you by an order of 250%. and no, it is 997.903 grams. Numbers are important.

quote:



And while not nearly as dangerous as fission reactors,

quote:

they are fucking dangerous. Bomb it and break it, and it will kill thousands.

quote:



here you go, though, build one, this is just fuck around, you will notice that they have more than drywall and paper stopping the excited neutrons from getting out,

quote:


Here is a definition that meets the necessary and sufficient conditions of a neutron bomb.

A neutron bomb, officially termed one type of Enhanced Radiation Weapon (ERW), is a low yield thermonuclear weapon in which a burst of neutrons generated by a nuclear fusion reaction is intentionally allowed to escape the weapon, rather than being absorbed by its other components.
Thats all.