Hamilton to stay on $10 bill; Jackson may go (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Zonie63 -> Hamilton to stay on $10 bill; Jackson may go (4/18/2016 4:44:40 PM)

$20 bill, not $10, may now feature a woman in favor of keeping Hamilton

quote:

WASHINGTON, April 18 (UPI) -- The U.S. Treasury is expected to announce this week that its plan to prominently feature a woman on the $10 bill will change in favor of replacing former President Andrew Jackson on the $20 bill.

Instead of making a historically important woman the main image on the $10, relegating Alexander Hamilton to the back of the bill, the founder of the United States' financial system will likely remain key, with a number of other important figures or slices of U.S. history on the back. An announcement is expected later this week, an anonymous U.S. official told CNN.

Last year's announcement of a proposed overhaul of the $10 bill to feature a woman quickly found a national audience eager to suggest appropriate honorees -- former first lady Eleanor Roosevelt and female leaders of the suffrage and abolitionist movements were often mentioned. Fans of Hamilton, and of a currently popular Broadway play based on his life, Hamilton, also weighed in, saying the less-popular Jackson should be replaced instead.


I actually thought that's what they should have done originally. I think it's the better move to keep Hamilton on the $10 and replace Jackson on the $20 bill.

But they still haven't decided which woman to put on the $20.

quote:

The announcements could come this week, but results won't be seen in American wallets for years. The Advance Counterfeit Deterrence steering committee, comprised of Treasury, Federal Reserve and U.S. Secret Service representatives, must design and execute a variety of anti-counterfeit elements on the new currency. And because of counterfeit deterrence procedures it won't be until 2030 that new bills will enter circulation.

"The blue security stripe on the $100 note took over 15 years to develop," CNN's source noted.




TheCabal -> RE: Hamilton to stay on $10 bill; Jackson may go (4/18/2016 4:51:39 PM)

A positive development I think. Hamilton was critical to the US financial system, he deserves a spot on our currency. Jackson wasn't even one of our better presidents.

As for the woman... there are a lot of possibilities. Personally, I like Amelia Erhart. It would be nice to have someone on our currency that's a) non-political; and b) is representative of the US at it's best.




thishereboi -> RE: Hamilton to stay on $10 bill; Jackson may go (4/18/2016 5:06:22 PM)

I think it's a good idea. I'd like to see Harriet Tubman on there. [:)]




thompsonx -> RE: Hamilton to stay on $10 bill; Jackson may go (4/18/2016 5:10:04 PM)


ORIGINAL: Zonie63

My pick for the new $20 would be iva toguri




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Hamilton to stay on $10 bill; Jackson may go (4/18/2016 6:26:24 PM)

Dafuq?
How does this even matter?




MasterG2kTR -> RE: Hamilton to stay on $10 bill; Jackson may go (4/18/2016 6:30:45 PM)

The way this shit goes they'll probably wait until after the election to see if it should be Hillary (assuming she gets elected) [8|]




Marini -> RE: Hamilton to stay on $10 bill; Jackson may go (4/18/2016 7:11:51 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

I think it's a good idea. I'd like to see Harriet Tubman on there. [:)]

Me too
Got to love Harriet Tubman.




Phydeaux -> RE: Hamilton to stay on $10 bill; Jackson may go (4/18/2016 7:41:15 PM)

Truly the triumph of symbolism over substance.

Tubman .. really? Were tubmans accomplishments so much greater than frederic douglas? Martin Luther King?


Or are we putting a woman on the bill, because.. its time for a woman,hmm?




MrRodgers -> RE: Hamilton to stay on $10 bill; Jackson may go (4/18/2016 9:09:21 PM)

Hamilton had some good points on how to arrange the new US economy early but being a banker and starting the bank of NY and not learning from Smith's 'An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations,' was not the father of private banking. He instead favored the USB (a national central bank and banking system) which was to lend to the Fed, govt. and serve the favored elites.

This was one of Jefferson's biggest quarrels with Hamilton particularly how it also fostered the federal govt's central powers. Adams sided with Jefferson correctly predicting that we would then turn paper into money (not just currency) and 'forever be slave to the speculators.'

Jackson was a butcher and slave owning whore who never made a dime with real work. But he was for the little guy and against the banking elites...which they were.

They could get rid of both in my mind and put women on both the ten and the twenty.

How about Clarissa "Clara" Harlowe Barton who was a pioneering nurse and who founded the American Red Cross ?

And Elizabeth Cady Stanton (1815-1902), who had launched the suffrage campaign by “sending forth that daring declaration of rights ?”




BamaD -> RE: Hamilton to stay on $10 bill; Jackson may go (4/18/2016 9:14:55 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

Hamilton had some good points on how to arrange the new US economy early but being a banker and starting the bank of NY and not learning from Smith's 'An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations,' was not the father of private banking. He instead favored the USB (a national central bank) which was to lend to the Fed, govt. and serve the favored elites.

This was one of Jefferson's biggest quarrels with Hamilton particularly how it also fostered the federal govt's central powers.

Jackson was a butcher and slave owning whore who never made a dime with real work. But he was for the little guy and against the banking elites...which they were.

They could get rid of both in my mind and put women on both the ten and the twenty.

Jackson never did any work.
Why would the new people both have to be women?
Does being a woman automatically qualify them?
If they put Hillary's picture on a bill it should be the $3 bill.




MrRodgers -> RE: Hamilton to stay on $10 bill; Jackson may go (4/18/2016 9:19:31 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

Hamilton had some good points on how to arrange the new US economy early but being a banker and starting the bank of NY and not learning from Smith's 'An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations,' was not the father of private banking. He instead favored the USB (a national central bank) which was to lend to the Fed, govt. and serve the favored elites.

This was one of Jefferson's biggest quarrels with Hamilton particularly how it also fostered the federal govt's central powers.

Jackson was a butcher and slave owning whore who never made a dime with real work. But he was for the little guy and against the banking elites...which they were.

They could get rid of both in my mind and put women on both the ten and the twenty.

Jackson never did any work.
Why would the new people both have to be women?
Does being a woman automatically qualify them?
If they put Hillary's picture on a bill it should be the $3 bill.

No president since FDR even qualifies in my mind let alone HRC. And a woman would be welcome change...as amended.




Zonie63 -> RE: Hamilton to stay on $10 bill; Jackson may go (4/18/2016 9:30:59 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: Zonie63

My pick for the new $20 would be iva toguri



I was thinking of the Queen of Hawaii: Lydia Liliʻu Loloku Walania Wewehi Kamakaʻeha

To write her full name would have to be continued on the next bill. [;)]




Zonie63 -> RE: Hamilton to stay on $10 bill; Jackson may go (4/18/2016 9:35:28 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterG2kTR

The way this shit goes they'll probably wait until after the election to see if it should be Hillary (assuming she gets elected) [8|]


I thought there was a rule that a person's likeness can't be printed on money until they've been dead for a certain number of years.




RottenJohnny -> RE: Hamilton to stay on $10 bill; Jackson may go (4/18/2016 10:24:01 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
If they put Hillary's picture on a bill it should be the $3 bill.

Wouldn't RuPaul be more appropriate for a $3 bill?




thompsonx -> RE: Hamilton to stay on $10 bill; Jackson may go (4/19/2016 1:12:47 AM)


ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Truly the triumph of symbolism over substance.

In the case of jackson...absolutely

Tubman .. really? Were tubmans accomplishments so much greater than frederic douglas? Martin Luther King?

So lets put douglas on the $1, and king on the $2 nate turner on the $5 keep hamilton (an octaroon) on the $10, toguri on the $20 tubman on the $50 and ali on the $100...and of course on the $1000 we should put floyd "show me the money" mayweather.


Or are we putting a woman on the bill, because.. its time for a woman,hmm?

Can't you just feel your white male priviledge just slipping through your fingers...poor baby




thishereboi -> RE: Hamilton to stay on $10 bill; Jackson may go (4/20/2016 2:58:59 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Marini


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

I think it's a good idea. I'd like to see Harriet Tubman on there. [:)]

Me too
Got to love Harriet Tubman.



Yea, she was one of my very first heros, what a women.




BondageersT -> RE: Hamilton to stay on $10 bill; Jackson may go (4/20/2016 3:27:21 AM)

LEWIS HAMILTON IS WORTH MUCH MORE THAN 10M.




freedomdwarf1 -> RE: Hamilton to stay on $10 bill; Jackson may go (4/20/2016 3:44:48 AM)

You off your meds again?? [8|]




enslaver -> RE: Hamilton to stay on $10 bill; Jackson may go (4/20/2016 4:07:35 AM)

More politically correct bullshit and a waste of several million taxpayer dollars before they re through, studies, new anti counterfeit measures, new printing costs, completely unnecessary waste just for the sake of change. This sort of thing is why the goddamn government has its priorities wrong and US trillions in debt!




thompsonx -> RE: Hamilton to stay on $10 bill; Jackson may go (4/20/2016 4:17:58 AM)


ORIGINAL: enslaver

More politically correct bullshit and a waste of several million taxpayer dollars before they re through, studies, new anti counterfeit measures, new printing costs, completely unnecessary waste just for the sake of change. This sort of thing is why the goddamn government has its priorities wrong and US trillions in debt!

Do you really think that anti counterfitting measures are unnecessary?




Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.1240234