Awareness
Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: Awareness A claim you cannot substantiate and which - even if it were true - would simply condemn you as a regurgitaor of doctrine taught by other regurgitators of doctrine. No matter how many times you regurgitate it a2+b2=c2...maybe pythagoreas ws right? Let me explain the difference between mathematical consistency and behavioural modelling. Pythagorean identity is a an idea built upon mathematical axioms. Having defined the foundations of geometry, the pythagorean theorem was discovered and tested for internal consistency by a wide variety of people. In contrast the left/right paradigm for political allegiance is simply a model which attempts to explain human behaviour. It has no intrinsic validity - the true test of any model is its ability to predict the future. And given the number of people - like myself - who reject the two-party system and the underlying left/right paradigm it's become clear that this model is incomplete and creaky. Part of the reason for this is the understanding that increasingly, some aspects of political allegiances are trending toward an authoritarian/libertarian axis. The rampant political correctness of the left is exactly like the censorship mentality of the hard-right. The suppression of ideas on the basis that they "make people uncomfortable" is identical to the censorship of ideas because they "are unamerican" or "go against God's law". The freedom of speech ideals from the left have vanished to make way for "safe spaces" and attempts to manipulate and control society through proclamations about "trigger warnings" and "micro-aggressions". The left has increasingly become a haven for useless malcontents incapable of contributing to society in any meaningful way. And the right is seeing a desertion from the old guard by young people who are increasingly uninterested in propping up corporate America. Don't get me wrong, these people are still capitalists, but they're also not stupid and recognise the corporate yoke for what it is. So what do we have here? We have a society which Bernie Sanders has ably demonstrated is far more interested in income inequality and getting big money out of politics than anyone could have predicted. However that group is not a homogenous one which supports socialism, but a coming together of various political allegiances who support the return to a democratic republic. The young people are overwhelmingly for Sanders because they respond to genuine authenticity and aren't content with the lies their parents swallowed hook, line and sinker. The left/right dichotomy is not an accurate model, it's a tool to attempt to corral people into one of two camps controlled by parties which are largely the same. Hilary Clinton is a Republican in everything but name and she'll continue the legacy of big money in politics and Washington kowtowing to corporate America. She's a disaster for the American people and I'm in real doubt that she'll be a better President for the country than Trump. Peon's insistence of the left/right model as an authoritarian take on the reality of politics is simply because he's a lazy thinker and because he doesn't want people to actually think for themselves. Like the right, the left has built a substantial power base on a bunch of lies and if people start thinking for themselves, that power base will be threatened. Watching Peon insist his primitive broken model is an accurate reflection of reality is amusing. No political commentator predicted the success of Sanders precisely because their thinking is similarly constrained. And because - as I've pointed out - there's an awful lot of regurgitation going on and precious little thinking.
_____________________________
Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.
|