RE: Authenticity rating (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


thompsonx -> RE: Authenticity rating (11/7/2016 8:51:16 AM)


ORIGINAL: mrsincere

but they are needles in the haystack.


Walk barefoot through that haystack and I bet you will have a little better luck.




MariaB -> RE: Authenticity rating (11/7/2016 9:55:07 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: mrsincere

but they are needles in the haystack.


Walk barefoot through that haystack and I bet you will have a little better luck.



I like that ^ I'm going to use that line in future.

As for the op, I don't agree you need to munch to meet a potential date but its good to get known because potential dates are often interested in your reputation. I was going to plenty of munches and clubs when I got an email on here from a man who sounded right up my street. Being a known member of the South London scene swung my decision to meet him. We ended up living together for four years. When we broke up I found another man on this site, even though I was then running a large BDSM club in London. People wanted to date me because of my involvement in the scene and I wanted a man who wasn’t trying to climb ladders. We have been married for seven years now.







WhoreMods -> RE: Authenticity rating (11/7/2016 9:59:42 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Alecta

Goes with the territory of a free site. Sophisticated verifications are for pay sites; where your authenticity is determined by how much you're willing to pay at the door

Fucking alt.com.
Dearie me, this site may be crap, but it isn't that crap, and at least you don't have to pay for the crap.




Greatlilbabygirl -> RE: Authenticity rating (11/7/2016 11:27:11 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mrsincere

I've been on here for months now and 99% of the "women" I've spoken with are asking for CC information within the first few messages. I'm qualified to spout off about authenticity.

99% of the guys who message me I end up telling to fuck off. Perhaps I should start asking for CC info.




UllrsIshtar -> RE: Authenticity rating (11/7/2016 11:48:49 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greatlilbabygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: mrsincere

I've been on here for months now and 99% of the "women" I've spoken with are asking for CC information within the first few messages. I'm qualified to spout off about authenticity.

99% of the guys who message me I end up telling to fuck off. Perhaps I should start asking for CC info.


The fastest way to never hear from a guy again is to send him your Amazon wishlist and tell him to buy you something to prove he's real.

AND (oddly enough) it will get you less hate mail, bitching, or whining than a polite "thanks but no thanks" does.

As a special bonus, about .001% of those whom you send your wishlist too, will actually buy you something, providing you have items on it costing less than $5. (Which ends up being kinda annoying, because if you're ethical you really should actually then talk to him as well, at least for a bit, so I recommend not having items on your wishlist which cost less than $5.)




LadyPact -> RE: Authenticity rating (11/7/2016 1:47:01 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mrsincere
I'm qualified to spout off about authenticity.

And, I'm qualified to laugh at you.

I don't mean that against you, personally. It's because a lot of things are seen differently now. Had you been here a few years back, you'd have seen plenty of things where people from the forums would say, "hey, we're doing this fun thing, so who wants to come along" or "sounds like fun, let's do a house party". Birthdays, anniversaries, in town for X, let's get dinner. Some of the posters who used to do those things have moved on, but some are still here, too.

(Just a hint. It's really, really hard to argue with those of us who have met hundreds of people via the site over the years. [;)])




OsideGirl -> RE: Authenticity rating (11/7/2016 1:53:49 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mrsincere

I've been on here for months now and 99% of the "women" I've spoken with are asking for CC information within the first few messages. I'm qualified to spout off about authenticity.

The common denominator here is you, which means there is something flawed in your search method.




Alecta -> RE: Authenticity rating (11/7/2016 2:02:59 PM)

Gotta give the boy marks for learning to switch it up though lol




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Authenticity rating (11/7/2016 4:40:16 PM)

quote:

99% of the guys who message me I end up telling to fuck off. Perhaps I should start asking for CC info.

Huh. I am so glad I made my profile the way I did, I get almost no mail. [:)]




RedMagic1 -> RE: Authenticity rating (11/7/2016 5:30:54 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

(Just a hint. It's really, really hard to argue with those of us who have met hundreds of people via the site over the years. [;)])



In fairness, though, how many people have you met off this site in the last 12 months, say? I don't have your number of meets, but mine is well above average, and the site feels different to me now, more sparse. I looked at Fet recently, too, and there's more activity there than here, but the large personals groups look dead. My feeling -- with only superficial evidence so far -- is that people have moved on.

My current guess: the popularity of 50 Shades means that it is ok to ask for kink on a normal dating site (and in normal real-life flirtation), so there's less need for a secret place on the internet where the pervs hang out.




UllrsIshtar -> RE: Authenticity rating (11/7/2016 5:32:10 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

99% of the guys who message me I end up telling to fuck off. Perhaps I should start asking for CC info.

Huh. I am so glad I made my profile the way I did, I get almost no mail. [:)]


It's cause they're scared that both your dudes are gonna come beat them up if they bother you. [:D]




LadyPact -> RE: Authenticity rating (11/7/2016 6:26:46 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: RedMagic1
In fairness, though, how many people have you met off this site in the last 12 months, say? I don't have your number of meets, but mine is well above average, and the site feels different to me now, more sparse. I looked at Fet recently, too, and there's more activity there than here, but the large personals groups look dead. My feeling -- with only superficial evidence so far -- is that people have moved on.

My current guess: the popularity of 50 Shades means that it is ok to ask for kink on a normal dating site (and in normal real-life flirtation), so there's less need for a secret place on the internet where the pervs hang out.

It's a fair question, which my answer would bore you to death. That tag in my sig line has become my new policy, so unless it's a long term poster, somebody that has met someone that I know personally, or some kind of similar situation, I just delete that stuff. I don't make posts here any longer about what kink events I attend, advance notice of classes I'm doing, or mention any trip MP and I are taking elsewhere until we've returned home. I know it's been a while, but if you jog your memory a bit, you might have a recollection as to why.

If somebody sends me email on Fet as well as here, that I'll do. Forty-eight hours ago, I was in a room with a number of people that hit three digits at any given time. I didn't even bother to ask if any of them had a CM account.






UllrsIshtar -> RE: Authenticity rating (11/7/2016 7:03:12 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

Forty-eight hours ago, I was in a room with a number of people that hit three digits at any given time. I didn't even bother to ask if any of them had a CM account.



I find that in clubs, they look at you funny when you ask that anyways, if they've even heard of it at all.

I don't like Fet, but I use it by necessity to keep in touch with the kinksters I know offline. CM is strictly for dealing with kinksters I only know online.

Which reminds me... I'm driving CO to NH to CO here pretty soon, and I'm sure there's some online only people along that route whom I never met that I should set up 'meet for drinks meet' with. I should start figuring out who they are...






RedMagic1 -> RE: Authenticity rating (11/7/2016 7:04:44 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact
[color=#660099I know it's been a while, but if you jog your memory a bit, you might have a recollection as to why.


It was one of the first things I thought of when I looked at this message board again about a week ago. Anyway, I think it's rude to "talk in code" on someone else's thread, so I'll stop, but if you want to continue for whatever reason, if you write me on Fet, I'll respond.

But what I'm trying to say is that I think the OP has a point. He's frustrated, so he's expressing himself like a bit of dick, and that probably doesn't help his chances with the ladies, but I think it's probably harder to meet women here than it used to be, and it was never easy. And, like other dating sites, 10% of the people get 90% of the dates. I just happened to be part of that 10% here because I type gud.




UllrsIshtar -> RE: Authenticity rating (11/7/2016 7:08:19 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: RedMagic1

And, like other dating sites, 10% of the people get 90% of the dates. I just happened to be part of that 10% here because I type gud.


Nope, it was recently determined that you're a predator, and don't you forget it!




DocStrange -> RE: Authenticity rating (11/7/2016 7:23:30 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mrsincere

I've been on here for months now and 99% of the "women" I've spoken with are asking for CC information within the first few messages. I'm qualified to spout off about authenticity.


Well if you cannot spot the fakes from the reals, you are not qualified. They are extremely easy spot. The site even has email controls to help weed out the unwanted.

I have been on CM/CS since 2005. In that time I have met in person about 50+ women (and even played with some) from here and about 125+ members in total. I have met people from Germany, England, USA, China and Brazil.

I am rather an introvert and tend to not like the big public parties. I prefer smaller private events. And I have a major rubber fetish which most Dommes do not get into. With all that I can still find and meet people here at CM. So if you cannot meet someone, then you need to re-examine your approach. It is just not that hard. I do recommend learning the art of courtship or even flirting.




RedMagic1 -> RE: Authenticity rating (11/7/2016 7:23:32 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar
Nope, it was recently determined that you're a predator, and don't you forget it!

Come a little closer when you say that, you logical goddess.




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Authenticity rating (11/7/2016 7:42:42 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

99% of the guys who message me I end up telling to fuck off. Perhaps I should start asking for CC info.

Huh. I am so glad I made my profile the way I did, I get almost no mail. [:)]


It's cause they're scared that both your dudes are gonna come beat them up if they bother you. [:D]

Actually a large percentage of those who do write me insist that the Fellas are fat losers with little dicks. Apparently this makes them more attractive to me than the guys who write me. :)




UllrsIshtar -> RE: Authenticity rating (11/7/2016 7:45:51 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick


quote:

ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

99% of the guys who message me I end up telling to fuck off. Perhaps I should start asking for CC info.

Huh. I am so glad I made my profile the way I did, I get almost no mail. [:)]


It's cause they're scared that both your dudes are gonna come beat them up if they bother you. [:D]

Actually a large percentage of those who do write me insist that the Fellas are fat losers with little dicks. Apparently this makes them more attractive to me than the guys who write me. :)



I've never understood the "I'm going to convince you what a great person I would be for you, by telling you that you have terrible taste in the partner(s) you're currently with" approach.

If I have bad taste, what's me dating you gonna say about you exactly? [8|]




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Authenticity rating (11/7/2016 8:23:20 PM)

LOL
So true. [:D][:D]




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625