RE: Legal scholars to Trump: Abide by Constitution

RE: Legal scholars to Trump: Abide by Constitution (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

WhoreMods -> RE: Legal scholars to Trump: Abide by Constitution (12/14/2016 9:02:46 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX Are you willfully ignorant, or just ignorant? [image]http://granitegrok.com/wp-content/uploads/obama-constitution.jpg[/image] The Google hits go on and on http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2013/12/23/president-obamas-top-10-constitutional-violations-of-2013/#43438e7a41bf http://www.nationalreview.com/article/428882/obama-violate-constitution-top-ten-2015 http://hotair.com/archives/2016/11/02/obama-attacks-trump-wait-disrespecting-constitution/ http://www.infowars.com/75-times-obama-broke-law-during-presidency/ Nothing you've cited there is a halfway credible source, or describes a real violation of the constitution. Given your dismissal elsewhere of partisan sources that don't share your own bias, you'll have to do a lot better than that. (Given your tremendous respect for the Constitution, I take it you were up in arms when it was Cheney and his trained monkey ignoring it, rather than some Democrat coconut? If not, you're demonstrating one of those hypocritical double standard things that you claim to find so offensive...)

Musicmystery -> RE: Legal scholars to Trump: Abide by Constitution (12/14/2016 9:19:57 AM)
It's just a troll. Never specifies information, only attacks posters and sources, and never on their points. Ignore it until it gets bored.

DaddySatyr -> RE: Legal scholars to Trump: Abide by Constitution (12/14/2016 9:50:12 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX Such thick, dripping irony to see the alt left bleating about the poor, defenseless Constitution, after eight long years of happily shredding it Well, the Constitution is a "living document" that the socialist (infiltrators?) wing of the Dumbocrat party has been trying to "kill" for about 50 years. Bless their little socialistic heathen hearts! Michael

BoscoX -> RE: Legal scholars to Trump: Abide by Constitution (12/14/2016 10:07:34 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX Are you willfully ignorant, or just ignorant? [image]http://granitegrok.com/wp-content/uploads/obama-constitution.jpg[/image] The Google hits go on and on http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2013/12/23/president-obamas-top-10-constitutional-violations-of-2013/#43438e7a41bf http://www.nationalreview.com/article/428882/obama-violate-constitution-top-ten-2015 http://hotair.com/archives/2016/11/02/obama-attacks-trump-wait-disrespecting-constitution/ http://www.infowars.com/75-times-obama-broke-law-during-presidency/ Nothing you've cited there is a halfway credible source, or describes a real violation of the constitution. Given your dismissal elsewhere of partisan sources that don't share your own bias, you'll have to do a lot better than that. (Given your tremendous respect for the Constitution, I take it you were up in arms when it was Cheney and his trained monkey ignoring it, rather than some Democrat coconut? If not, you're demonstrating one of those hypocritical double standard things that you claim to find so offensive...) I see - so, it's willful ignorance on your part. Got it.

BoscoX -> RE: Legal scholars to Trump: Abide by Constitution (12/14/2016 10:13:56 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery It's just a troll. Never specifies information, only attacks posters and sources, and never on their points. Ignore it until it gets bored. "It"? Women who disagree with you are "cunts" and anyone who disagrees must be subhuman. And you think you are a moderate. "The alt left is strong in this one"

WhoreMods -> RE: Legal scholars to Trump: Abide by Constitution (12/14/2016 11:03:56 AM)
Your taste for dismissing the NYT and other "leftist" sources as unreliable means that any citations you produce from right leaning sources can be dismissed in the same terms for the same reasons. Find an objective source without an ideological axe to grind, or shut up up whining about liberal biased media. (Or just continue flaunting your own wilful ignorance. That seems a lot likely.)

Musicmystery -> RE: Legal scholars to Trump: Abide by Constitution (12/14/2016 11:13:23 AM)
The NY Times, no doubt, while perhaps not fabricating news, certainly choose and headlined news with a clear spin in her direction. It was shameful. But since it was also anti-Sanders, I don't think it could fairly be labeled "leftist." Nor does that mean its entire news reporting is false -- though careful reading and considering the evidence is always a good idea.

BoscoX -> RE: Legal scholars to Trump: Abide by Constitution (12/14/2016 11:32:19 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods Your taste for dismissing the NYT and other "leftist" sources as unreliable means that any citations you produce from right leaning sources can be dismissed in the same terms for the same reasons. Find an objective source without an ideological axe to grind, or shut up up whining about liberal biased media. (Or just continue flaunting your own wilful ignorance. That seems a lot likely.) Why do you assume that I or anyone else on here cares if you choose to be so unashamedly ignorant? I know that one has to go to the opposition for well rounded criticism of the elite ruling class. For that reason I occasionally read New York Times articles, just like I peruse every source of news and information imaginable. The Times isn't going to report extensively about Obama's (or any Democrats) illegal or unconstitutional endeavors, just like national Review will never oppose Trump. Oh wait - yes they do. (Very much so). http://www.nationalreview.com/article/443021/conservatives-uniting-behind-trump-are-delusional http://mediamatters.org/research/2016/01/22/national-review-launches-conservative-war-on-do/208111 The thing about the Times, is that it is all Kool-Aid all of the time, and deserves every bit of criticism that it gets. You asked for examples of Obama's unconstitutional dealings but refuse to see them. You want to look more like the fool that you already appear to be, that's on you. Have at it. Drink up.

mnottertail -> RE: Legal scholars to Trump: Abide by Constitution (12/14/2016 12:38:44 PM)
mediamatters circlefelching a national review article of last january, and national review not big on trump but circlefelching a daily wire article, is hardly a yes they do (very much so) response to anything, particularly that National Review is opposing Trump. Daily wire might be, lukewarmedly, but that is a different kettle of fish and it aint by any stretch a 'they' fish. It is a singular wistful (if anything) op-ed that NR has refelched.

WhoreMods -> RE: Legal scholars to Trump: Abide by Constitution (12/14/2016 1:53:51 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX You asked for examples of Obama's unconstitutional dealings but refuse to see them. No, I asked for examples of Obama's unconstitutional dealings, and you refused to provide them. Four chunks of nonsense with hysterical neocons trying (and failing) to spin the ACA as a breach of the constitution is not proof of anything. If you're so aware of both sides of the media, you should be able to do a lot better than that.

Hillwilliam -> RE: Legal scholars to Trump: Abide by Constitution (12/14/2016 3:25:48 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX Everybody keep panicking! Well, you childish alt left parrots, at least. The rest of us know that our separate branches of government provide safeguards so that even your precious precious Hillary Clinton would have had difficulty using executive orders to violate the second amendment as she promised, and that the Supreme Court already struck down her unconstitutional plans to violate our free speech rights. Choo choo motherfuckers, Trump Train coming through Mr Trump will have many of the same problems unless he takes a deep breath and starts thinking with his brain and not his ego and wallet. I've seen it happen and hope to see more now that he is elected. I'm not holding a hell of a lot of hope but it could happen.

MrRodgers -> RE: Legal scholars to Trump: Abide by Constitution (12/14/2016 3:29:59 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: subrob1967 FR These "Scholars" are about 8 years too late with their advice. 16

Musicmystery -> RE: Legal scholars to Trump: Abide by Constitution (12/14/2016 6:42:49 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam Mr Trump will have many of the same problems unless he takes a deep breath and starts thinking with his brain and not his ego and wallet. I've seen it happen and hope to see more now that he is elected. I'm not holding a hell of a lot of hope but it could happen. In an editorial published Monday China's state-run Global Times newspaper wrote that "in the field of diplomacy" President-elect Donald Trump is "as ignorant as a child." A senior intelligence official told NCRM that the worst aspect of the Russian debacle is Trump's apparent naiveté regarding the importance of briefings and keeping informed. “He just doesn't get it. Every action he takes, every tweet he sends, every public pronouncement he makes has a direct impact on more than just foreign policies and U.S. interests. He is displaying willing effort to remain ignorant about matters than change in mere hours or even minutes – that impact not just national security but global stability.” And that's my concern -- he's reckless and irresponsible. A disaster waiting to happen. Storm Clouds Gathering Around Trump http://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/brody_levesque/from_russia_to_china_storm_clouds_gathering_around_trump

BoscoX -> RE: Legal scholars to Trump: Abide by Constitution (12/14/2016 6:54:37 PM)
The Chinese are just pissed because they know President Trump won't bow down and lick their smelly feet like they are used to from Obama.

Musicmystery -> RE: Legal scholars to Trump: Abide by Constitution (12/14/2016 9:42:11 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers quote: ORIGINAL: subrob1967 FR These "Scholars" are about 8 years too late with their advice. 16 Good point.

MrRodgers -> RE: Legal scholars to Trump: Abide by Constitution (12/14/2016 11:03:00 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX The Chinese are just pissed because they know President Trump won't bow down and lick their smelly feet like they are used to from Obama. Oops

MrRodgers -> RE: Legal scholars to Trump: Abide by Constitution (12/14/2016 11:06:15 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX The Chinese are just pissed because they know President Trump won't bow down and lick their smelly feet like they are used to from Obama. Oh I don't know, China is still the great profit center and that is the centerpiece of...US foreign policy as always. I mean only those with half a brain or more knew damn well capitalism and markets weren't going to change Chinese communist stripes. Hell after all, they coulda been shooting down students in protest. Oh that's right...they did under repub pres.. Well, they coulda been throwing 1000's of people in jail for trying to exercise some rights. Oh that's right...they still are under any US pres. So no, l am sure the Chinese much preferred repub dick lickers to dem foot lickers, knowing full well that with the repubs, it's all about the rent-seekers and a good profit. Nothing much else matters. Trump will bow down (play ball) or else.

WhoreMods -> RE: Legal scholars to Trump: Abide by Constitution (12/15/2016 4:56:46 AM)
I'd certainly be interested to know why fawning at the Chinese is seen as a Democrat thing when it was Nixon who first set a precedent for that one.

BoscoX -> RE: Legal scholars to Trump: Abide by Constitution (12/15/2016 5:20:16 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods I'd certainly be interested to know why fawning at the Chinese is seen as a Democrat thing when it was Nixon who first set a precedent for that one. Following that brilliant, stunning logic we also see that since Nixon begat the EPA Republicans are clearly the only choice for anyone and everyone who depends on planet Earth for their survival.

Lucylastic -> RE: Legal scholars to Trump: Abide by Constitution (12/15/2016 5:46:08 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods Your taste for dismissing the NYT and other "leftist" sources as unreliable means that any citations you produce from right leaning sources can be dismissed in the same terms for the same reasons. Find an objective source without an ideological axe to grind, or shut up up whining about liberal biased media. (Or just continue flaunting your own wilful ignorance. That seems a lot likely.) Why do you assume that I or anyone else on here cares if you choose to be so unashamedly ignorant? I know that one has to go to the opposition for well rounded criticism of the elite ruling class. For that reason I occasionally read New York Times articles, just like I peruse every source of news and information imaginable. The Times isn't going to report extensively about Obama's (or any Democrats) illegal or unconstitutional endeavors, just like national Review will never oppose Trump. Oh wait - yes they do. (Very much so). http://www.nationalreview.com/article/443021/conservatives-uniting-behind-trump-are-delusional http://mediamatters.org/research/2016/01/22/national-review-launches-conservative-war-on-do/208111 The thing about the Times, is that it is all Kool-Aid all of the time, and deserves every bit of criticism that it gets. You asked for examples of Obama's unconstitutional dealings but refuse to see them. You want to look more like the fool that you already appear to be, that's on you. Have at it. Drink up. National review is a rw site who decided early on that trump is a disaster looking to happen. Like a LOT of conservatives, its not just the left that thinks hes stark staring bonkers. Kissing arse, like the GOP has now done, didnt stop the NR... but youve taken the balls, now take the rest. open wide, say "AHHHHHHHH" you post truthers are so sad.

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 4 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.0625