Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Dianne releases the transcript


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Dianne releases the transcript Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Dianne releases the transcript - 1/11/2018 9:20:19 AM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

LMAO indictments are not rumours.



Indictments for perjury; not "collusion with Russia" The latter indictments for collusion will have the names: "Podesta", "Clinton" and "Abedin" on them.





_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Dianne releases the transcript - 1/11/2018 9:21:30 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

LOL Exactly, LMAO and thats exactly the problem with trumpers.
derp
no collusion no collusion,
except for Pappad and Flynn
oh and alho we havent heard it yet
don jr, and more
and Trump is responsible as much as hillary is.
thank you for playing



So ... do we stop the Mueller investigation or the congressional investigation into the weaponizing of intelligence against a presidential candidate. You, know, the one where there's actual evidence of "collusion with Russia"?

Do we stop both? Do we stop just one and not the other? Do we make a judgement call; which one is "worse"?

Thank YOU for playing. You've finally stumbled upon the truth. Even a blind squirrel finds a nut, occasionally.





no
investigate them all, put them all in jail, Ive said it more than once
just that there is FAR more evidence against the trump team


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Dianne releases the transcript - 1/11/2018 9:26:45 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

LMAO indictments are not rumours.



Indictments for perjury; not "collusion with Russia" The latter indictments for collusion will have the names: "Podesta", "Clinton" and "Abedin" on them.





collusion, once again ISNT the crime
derp


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Dianne releases the transcript - 1/11/2018 9:27:49 AM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
no
investigate them all, put them all in jail, Ive said it more than once
just that there is FAR more evidence against the trump team



Well, that's a matter of conjecture, really.

There's "FAR more" evidence of perjury (which could include a "brain fart" where someone changes their answer, just a little bit, in an FBI interview) and crimes that happened WAY before there was a "Trump Campaign".

There's a metric shit-ton of evidence of collusion with Russia, pay-for-play with Russia (and other "enemy" states), interfering in a democratic election (by dint of the fake dossier and the intel community being weaponized) and obstruction of justice (there's those "33,000 emails that were covered by subpoena, when destroyed", again) against the Shrillary Campaign.

This is scary shit and it's a shame that Dems and their mind-numbed, robot-like, PPLs are willing to play politics with the 4th amendment amongst other things.





_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Dianne releases the transcript - 1/11/2018 9:29:10 AM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
collusion, once again ISNT the crime
derp



Yet, it was the impetus for the Mueller appointment/investigation.

quote:

ORIGINAL:New York Times (That bastion of Trump support)
He is authorized to investigate “any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump,” according to Mr. Rosenstein’s order naming him to the post.


duh!





_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Dianne releases the transcript - 1/11/2018 9:37:14 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
I dont think you know the meaning of the word evidence.

show me the evidence that the dossier is fake
stop dribbling.
If your "proof" confirms hillary guilty, then trump is just as guilty.of as many crimes and more
but you dont seem to give a shit about any of his "problems" or at least are excusing them.
why is that?


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Dianne releases the transcript - 1/11/2018 9:37:19 AM   
MasterDrakk


Posts: 321
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
collusion, once again ISNT the crime
derp



Yet, it was the impetus for the Mueller appointment/investigation.

quote:

ORIGINAL:New York Times (That bastion of Trump support)
He is authorized to investigate “any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump,” according to Mr. Rosenstein’s order naming him to the post.


duh!






Yeah, no. collusion was not the impetus. And you have no credible citation that it was. And you never had.

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Dianne releases the transcript - 1/11/2018 9:38:55 AM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterDrakk

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
collusion, once again ISNT the crime
derp



Yet, it was the impetus for the Mueller appointment/investigation.

quote:

ORIGINAL:New York Times (That bastion of Trump support)
He is authorized to investigate “any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump,” according to Mr. Rosenstein’s order naming him to the post.


duh!






Yeah, no. collusion was not the impetus. And you have no credible citation that it was. And you never had.


This is HILARIOUS! Look up, ron (and maybe get an adult to help you with the "big" words).

In case you're no longer a fan of the failing NYT, perhaps you'd like a link to a DOJ transcript of Rosenstein's own words?





_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to MasterDrakk)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Dianne releases the transcript - 1/11/2018 9:40:12 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
collusion, once again ISNT the crime
derp



Yet, it was the impetus for the Mueller appointment/investigation.

quote:

ORIGINAL:New York Times (That bastion of Trump support)
He is authorized to investigate “any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump,” according to Mr. Rosenstein’s order naming him to the post.


duh!





that fits conspiracy quite nicely
but there is no crime of collusion.

BUT
there is for conspiracy
And that will come up very very soon

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Dianne releases the transcript - 1/11/2018 9:46:48 AM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

that fits conspiracy quite nicely
but there is no crime of collusion.



Linguistically (and legally), you're right, but in this case, "collusion" has been used synonymously for "conspiracy", ever since the she-cunt first made the accusation.

This is EASY!






_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Dianne releases the transcript - 1/11/2018 9:47:02 AM   
MasterDrakk


Posts: 321
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
no
investigate them all, put them all in jail, Ive said it more than once
just that there is FAR more evidence against the trump team



Well, that's a matter of conjecture, really.

There's "FAR more" evidence of perjury (which could include a "brain fart" where someone changes their answer, just a little bit, in an FBI interview) and crimes that happened WAY before there was a "Trump Campaign".

There's a metric shit-ton of evidence of collusion with Russia, pay-for-play with Russia (and other "enemy" states), interfering in a democratic election (by dint of the fake dossier and the intel community being weaponized) and obstruction of justice (there's those "33,000 emails that were covered by subpoena, when destroyed", again) against the Shrillary Campaign.

This is scary shit and it's a shame that Dems and their mind-numbed, robot-like, PPLs are willing to play politics with the 4th amendment amongst other things.





Is there anyone who can provide us with a metric shit-ton of evidence? Because to date not one nanogram of actual evidence has been presented on any of these matters.

Pure hallucinatory conjecture, yes, but no evidence.

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Dianne releases the transcript - 1/11/2018 9:51:00 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

that fits conspiracy quite nicely
but there is no crime of collusion.



Linguistically (and legally), you're right, but in this case, "collusion" has been used synonymously for "conspiracy", ever since the she-cunt first made the accusation.

This is EASY!







i trust your knowledge of the use of the words as much as I trust your legal knowledge.
that is none at all.
And collusion is an accusation.
Trump harps on about there being "no collusion" how many times in the past week????




_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Dianne releases the transcript - 1/11/2018 9:55:43 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterDrakk

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
collusion, once again ISNT the crime
derp



Yet, it was the impetus for the Mueller appointment/investigation.

quote:

ORIGINAL:New York Times (That bastion of Trump support)
He is authorized to investigate “any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump,” according to Mr. Rosenstein’s order naming him to the post.


duh!






Yeah, no. collusion was not the impetus. And you have no credible citation that it was. And you never had.


This is HILARIOUS! Look up, ron (and maybe get an adult to help you with the "big" words).

In case you're no longer a fan of the failing NYT, perhaps you'd like a link to a DOJ transcript of Rosenstein's own words?





the word collusion, isnt mentioned at your link, nor the pdf linked.


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Dianne releases the transcript - 1/11/2018 9:56:06 AM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
i trust your knowledge of the use of the words as much as I trust your legal knowledge.
that is none at all.



Oh! So the same amount I trust any words that come off of your fingertips, after being shown to have lied about me, at least twice, in the last few months.

Gotcha. We're "square", now.





_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Dianne releases the transcript - 1/11/2018 10:00:47 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
i trust your knowledge of the use of the words as much as I trust your legal knowledge.
that is none at all.



Oh! So the same amount I trust any words that come off of your fingertips, after being shown to have lied about me, at least twice, in the last few months.

Gotcha. We're "square", now.





describing you is not lying about you and no, we are NOT square.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Dianne releases the transcript - 1/11/2018 10:26:53 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
Interesting clip from AC 360 with adam schiff last night.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VkAACAuswMw
the schiff convo starts around 5.40.


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Dianne releases the transcript - 1/11/2018 10:31:28 AM   
MasterDrakk


Posts: 321
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterDrakk

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
collusion, once again ISNT the crime
derp



Yet, it was the impetus for the Mueller appointment/investigation.

quote:

ORIGINAL:New York Times (That bastion of Trump support)
He is authorized to investigate “any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump,” according to Mr. Rosenstein’s order naming him to the post.


duh!






Yeah, no. collusion was not the impetus. And you have no credible citation that it was. And you never had.


This is HILARIOUS! Look up, ron (and maybe get an adult to help you with the "big" words).

In case you're no longer a fan of the failing NYT, perhaps you'd like a link to a DOJ transcript of Rosenstein's own words?





This is hilarious daddyssissy, you dont know your words do you? in his own words:

Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein today announced the appointment of former Department of Justice official and FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III to serve as Special Counsel to oversee the previously-confirmed FBI investigation of Russian government efforts to influence the 2016 presidential election and related matters.
(no collusion words or impetus words in there)

In my capacity as acting Attorney General, I determined that it is in the public interest for me to exercise my authority and appoint a Special Counsel to assume responsibility for this matter,” said Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein. “My decision is not a finding that crimes have been committed or that any prosecution is warranted. I have made no such determination. What I have determined is that based upon the unique circumstances, the public interest requires me to place this investigation under the authority of a person who exercises a degree of independence from the normal chain of command.”
(no collusion words or impetus words in there)

Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein added, “Each year, the career professionals of the U.S. Department of Justice conduct tens of thousands of criminal investigations and handle countless other matters without regard to partisan political considerations. I have great confidence in the independence and integrity of our people and our processes. Considering the unique circumstances of this matter, however, I determined that a Special Counsel is necessary in order for the American people to have full confidence in the outcome. Our nation is grounded on the rule of law, and the public must be assured that government officials administer the law fairly. Special Counsel Mueller will have all appropriate resources to conduct a thorough and complete investigation, and I am confident that he will follow the facts, apply the law and reach a just result.”
(no collusion words or impetus words in there)

Special Counsel Mueller has agreed to resign from his private law firm in order to avoid any conflicts of interest with firm clients or attorneys.
(no collusion words or impetus words in there)

and from the order itself:

(i) any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals
associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump; and
(ii) any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation; and
(iii) any other matters within the scope of 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a).

(no collusion or impetus words there)

§ 600.4 Jurisdiction.
(a)Original jurisdiction. The jurisdiction of a Special Counsel shall be established by the Attorney General. The Special Counsel will be provided with a specific factual statement of the matter to be investigated. The jurisdiction of a Special Counsel shall also include the authority to investigate and prosecute federal crimes committed in the course of, and with intent to interfere with, the Special Counsel's investigation, such as perjury, obstruction of justice, destruction of evidence, and intimidation of witnesses; and to conduct appeals arising out of the matter being investigated and/or prosecuted.
(no collusion or impetus words there)


Here is a little help for you, which you need, as a moron, and you need great deals of it... if it is collusion or impetus, look for words that are spelled say............collusion or impetus. (just like that in your 'evidence' (LOL)).


(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Dianne releases the transcript - 1/11/2018 12:40:34 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10538
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline
Are you faked out ? I am. The right's enemies and critics...are all fake.

Mainstream and digital news...is all fake.

Seems to me, these are fake times...fake president, fake congress and who is ready for fake courts ?

Can't be that far away.

We know American born Hispanic decent judges...are essentially fake.

Twice federally sanctioned, 85 yr. old senile fascists who would be sheriff and is no more, now wants to become a fake senator.

I am all faked out kinkroids. Time for some fake blogs to go too.

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to MasterDrakk)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Dianne releases the transcript - 1/11/2018 8:39:28 PM   
MasterJaguar01


Posts: 1424
Joined: 12/2/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

The testimony would have been released through proper channels in due time, she did nothing heroic. Feinstein's presence demonstrated that the committee is has an unprofessional leftist hack in charge, a hot-headed howler




That is such bullshit. The testimony would never have been released, only selectively leaked by the Republicans on the committee.

It totally destroys the narrative that Hillary Clinton paid the Russians for the Dossier.

There is no WAY the Republicans would want the truth to come out on that.

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Dianne releases the transcript - 1/11/2018 8:47:02 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
hes lying to himself, again.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to MasterJaguar01)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Dianne releases the transcript Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2022
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078