Emperor1956
Posts: 2370
Joined: 11/7/2005 Status: offline
|
I wasn't going to reply to this thread, but the lack of intelligent male response finally got to me. Someone said "why do these otherwise intelligent men have such a bad reaction." Who says they are intelligent? Criticising a movie you've never seen because of a gay theme is pretty ignorant in my book. And yes, Jojo...based on the many anti-gay themes some of the previous male posters have in their writings, not just here but across the CM boards, "they doth protest too much". We often trash that which we fear in ourselves the most, eh? About the movie: It was nearly great. I agree with Manawyddan that it was slow at times. I very much disagree with his "lack of community" idea -- the entire point of this movie is that these are two men who cannot access the "Gay revolution". They are so deeply closeted in what they are that they must remain on the sidelines (and by the way, they are pretty clearly bisexual, not gay). They can't go to SF, or even to Juarez, in any sort of comfort or open way. The portrayals of men who are deeply emotionally stunted -- not just because they are gay but because of who they are and where they come from -- was painful and beautiful at the same time. The story is one of starcrossed lovers, I agree. The most painful and beautiful scenes for Me were with the parents of Jake G. (I am trying not to spoil anything). The raw love of a mother and father for a man they can't understand, but for whom they deeply grieve, was beautifully portrayed. It also is one of the most visually beautiful movies I'd seen in a long time. My wife grew up in that country, and the images -- both of the land and the people -- were impeccable. E.
_____________________________
"When you wake up, Pooh," said Piglet, "what's the first thing you say?" "What's for breakfast? What do you say, Piglet?" "I say, I wonder what's going to happen exciting today?" Pooh nodded thoughtfully. "It's the same thing," he said.
|