amayos
Posts: 1553
Joined: 6/2/2004 From: New England Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Missokyst If you are beating someone, or putting them through the paces of intense orgasms, they WILL respond. We who bottom or submit are merely canvasses on which a top displays his talents. Our response is colored by the implements you choose to use, to get your idea across. We are art. The top is the artist. With that in mind, very few canvasses need to be trained to be a canvas. But the ARTIST whose talents are displayed, must train to learn his craft. I think the idea of training is backward. I am the canvas. I will be colored according to your design. The top is the artist who must learn to paint. [/size][/font] It is true; the painter must have vision, master of technique, and choose his or her implements with care, but this is not to say the canvas appears without effort. How blank of a canvas can a slave make herself for that painting, and how cured will the image rendered upon her become? Stepping outside of that analogy, perhaps you will agree there are levels of depth in such relationships which exceed simple measurement of how well one responds to beatings and paces of orgasm, where likening the experience of the slave to the passivity of a canvas is not so accurate. Being completely obedient to the will of another is not a characteristic that is easily attained. However, if one describes their world in mere terms of top and bottom, perhaps this analogy does fit. From my point of view, there's more to it than that. There is great effort involved simply in seeing that trying not to struggle is inherently a contradiction.
< Message edited by amayos -- 9/13/2006 8:10:47 AM >
|