pyrobabe
Posts: 53
Joined: 10/5/2005 Status: offline
|
I always try to get to know the person that I'm talking to thats always the very first step. I think that is the most important step as well as building trust... without trust you can't have any kind of relationship. I know that with every person every step is different, but how long do you stay in the interviewing stage? I guess I'm talking about after you get a good feeling about who they are and such. If they are having a problem with something I usually give them an assignment/advice that involves helping themselves out more then it helps me. If it even has anything to do with me. So far I've learned that I need to be a little more precise on what stage we are in. I definately don't just start handing out punishments... but I like what MasterFireMaam has to say. " I don't "punish" in so much as I let them know what they've done that has displeased me...then I take away a privledge. For example, I have daily contact as an important part of my structure. If they miss daily contact, then I don't allow them daily contact for X amount of days. If this means something to them, we are much closer to being a match. If this doesn't have meaning (which you can tell by the fact they blow it off and/or leave), then know we aren't a match and move on. Doesn't mean it doesn't make me angry, sad or hurt, just that now I know." I haven't tried a daily contact time, but it sounds like a good idea. I also think this is a great idea from ownedgirlie. "He made it clear that until I was under his formal authority, he had no claims on me, and could make no demands of me. The subject of punishment never came up. If he had requested something of me and I didn't do it, then he would ask what about that task concerned me enough to choose not to do it. He got to know me, and got to know how my mind worked. In this way, he could determine if I was even a good fit for him - certainly if the things he wanted of me troubled me greatly, then it wasn't a good match. If over time I consistently chose not to meet his requests (and they were fairly mild at the time), it would be clear that I wasn't very interested in his authority over me and he would have eventually lost interest. If it appeared that I wasn't interested in him, he would not waste his time pursuing me. Punishment was never even considered that early in the relationship. There wasn't even a relationship yet. Conversation did, though, and lots of it." "He made it clear that until I was under his formal authority, he had no claims on me, and could make no demands of me." This is very true... but with this one person I thought we were well passed the interview stage we were talking for 9 months and he did all the assignments... we had him under consideration he was saying he wanted to be trained by me so training started and everything went straight to hell. I don't think he understood what he wanted or enough about the lifestyle and the more I tried to explain the more dense he seem to get. no offense to him if he reads this. He must have claimed 50 times that "all he wanted to do was be at my feet and serve me." That is a quote from him. Though Master and him kinda had a fight... so things start to go bad there... (long story) More or less that is where it started to dissolve between those two i think. Also from thisishis, By explaining that my opinions are valued and appreciated and i am expected to share them. And by explaining that my sharing them did not mean that He had to comply with them or accept them or make His decisions based on them. It was explained that my opinions would be given concideration and that He would has the final say regarding everything, and all final decision making power. Also, training includes punishment and disapline. Punishment is never anything that i enjoy. Punishment is not given lightly. Any punishment received is 'well earned'. Both are used as a means for teaching, in their own ways. Yes, this is very important and expected as well. I was trying to teach the person above this and it just went over there head and kept right on going.... I typically get to know them and give them little assignments that help themselves and if they do them I take that to mean they are serious and then after they do a few and then they don't do an assignment that is when I usually punish them... but I think I'm going to rethink that. What are your thoughts on that approach? If you want to know more about the assignments I'm a positive person so typically the first thing I teach a sub/slave is how to be postive and how to get what you want. I usually teach affirmations and meditation. I try to help them help themselves so if they aren't going to come and live with me they have at least learned something that will help them in the long run... maybe that is a bad approach. Any thoughts? What i've learned thus far is I need to rethink my approach and be more clear with the other person on where we are at. I think I was kinda forgetting about what its like to be on the other side. This is a good wake up call. Thanks for all your replies and tips more are welcome. I hope I haven't left anything out and that I've answered everyone's questions... if not please ask again and I will try to reply the best I can.
|