Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: submissive vs slave


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master >> RE: submissive vs slave Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: submissive vs slave - 2/2/2005 6:40:40 PM   
TallDarkAndWitty


Posts: 1893
Joined: 6/12/2004
From: Rochester, NY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: perverseangelic
Those 2 ideas expressed seem to conflict. How can one be "sometimes" property?


One easy way is to sign a slave contract that has a limited duration; maybe its 2 hours, or maybe it's 24. Consider it a lease instead of a purchase.

quote:


How can property place limits on the way in which it belongs to someone.


Much the way the U.S. Government places limits on the way in which you actually "own" real estate. If you read the fine print, the government can come and take away your property at any time through the principle of eminent domain.

All sorts of property is "conditionally" owned. You may own a townhouse or a condo, but you have get approval from some board to throw a party or have a yard sale. You may own a house, but just try and use that house to accept commercial garbage...your town will soon show you just where you property rights end.

Slaves can, in the same way, be conditionally owned. This allows for the satisfaction of that need to be owned, without the sill requirements of 24/7 no-limits bullshit.

quote:


It seems like you say something, and then say the opposite. First, you assert that to be a slave you need to be owned by someone, to be their property and that to simply submit to their will doesn't make you belong to someone else. I can't see how the definition of "property" jives with "three days a week" or "within limits"


Have you ever purchased a timeshare? You essentially buy a house that you can use a few weeks a year and you can't make any changes to it. Yet, it is still owned, in some small way, by you. A three day a week slave with limits is a lot like a timeshare.

quote:


once again it comes down to a definition. What is "property"?


I am using a pretty standard definition of "property". It is something that is owned. Ownership need not be sole ownership, nor ownership without limits.

quote:


Is it someone who belongs to someone when they want to belong to them?


If it's SSC, yup.

quote:


Is it someone who gives up -all- his/her rights?


Ownership need not mean that, though it can. See examples above.

quote:


Is it someone who gives up some of them, expect the ones he/she doesnt' want to give up?


If they consider themselves owned, and their owner considers them owned, then they are property. Possession is 9/10ths of the law.

quote:


You're picking and choosing the way you define "property" as relative to the people invovled just as we pick and choose how we define "submissive" and "slave" It's a different word, the same problem.


As I showed above, property is already a relative word. Slave and submissive are not. Slaves are owned, submissives submit.

quote:


As I see it, what Sub4hire did was use your first definition and take it to it's logical extreme. Person as property just as lawnmower is property.


She created an insulting strawman of slaves as less than human.

quote:


She didn't take into account the variations for relationships based on the people invovled. Rather, she used the -literal- definition of the terms you used. Isn't that what you've been asking us to do? Standardize the terms?


Within the context of the lifestyle, yes. To take it out of the context of the lifestyle is, in my opinion, an insult. It is like overhearing a sharps player boast about how he drew blood and having him arrested for battery. From a n00b, I write it off as ignorance and ignore it. From someone with some experience in the lifestyle, I find it insulting.

quote:


yes, the thing she said -were- offensive to one practicing consnesual slavery, hoewver they were -not- out of line when it comes to someone owning property.


I would think the very fact that we are discussing this on a BDSM message board would suggest that we are talking about consensual slavery.

Taggard

_____________________________

A most rewarding compliment is an insult from the ill-informed.


My slave: Kat (RainaVerene on the other side) and her website: RainaVerene.com

(in reply to perverseangelic)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: submissive vs slave - 2/2/2005 6:52:35 PM   
panthergoddess


Posts: 93
Joined: 1/11/2005
From: Bessemer City, NC USA
Status: offline
Was it Kenneth Star or Bill Clinton that said "Define 'it'"

you say tomato I say tomahto

which came first the chicken or the egg?

If a frog had wings would it bump it's arse every time it landed?


Sorry.....just had to vent in my own way......please...continue the "discussion"

_____________________________

"No good deed goes unpunished."

(in reply to TallDarkAndWitty)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: submissive vs slave - 2/2/2005 6:57:43 PM   
TallDarkAndWitty


Posts: 1893
Joined: 6/12/2004
From: Rochester, NY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mistoferin
According to this thread, or at least in some opinions, a slave is simply an indication of ownership. In many ways I do agree with this, I believe that to some degree the word slave indicates ownership. I think that there is much more to it than that though, such as giving oneself completely and never questioning where your Master will steer the course of your life to.


I just don't get why slaves have to be sooooo damned willing to give up everything. Why can't those who want to be owned just dabble a bit in being owned??? Why is it that submissives can submit sometimes and not others and still be submissives, but a slave must be owned 24/7 no-questions no-limits or they aren't a slave.

This life should be as much about having fun as it is about satisfying a need. Being a slave for a bit can be freeing and relaxing and even a bit fun (or so I have head...don't you go getting any ideas, Lily). You shouldn't have to sign your life away for ever just to enjoy being owned for a bit.

quote:


A submissive, by some opinions here, can not be owned.


I don't think anyone actually said that. Slaves like to be owned. Submissives like to submit. Slaves can be submissives and submissives can be slaves. The desire to be owned and the desire to submit are completely unrelated.

quote:


Now let me add a little twist. I consider myself to be submissive(granted a deeply intense submissive) because I do wish to retain some "rights", such as I will not be signing over any property or rights to children to anyone anytime soon. However, I am most definitely owned property, always have been.


Sounds to me like you are submissive slave. You like to submit, making you a submissive. You are owned, making you a slave. Pretty simple how that works.

quote:


My point is that according to the definitions laid out here.....well I just don't fit. I can't be submissive because I am owned. I can't be slave because I choose to retain some of my rights to choose.


Well, according to my definitions you fit just fine...

Taggard

_____________________________

A most rewarding compliment is an insult from the ill-informed.


My slave: Kat (RainaVerene on the other side) and her website: RainaVerene.com

(in reply to mistoferin)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: submissive vs slave - 2/2/2005 6:59:38 PM   
Goodmix


Posts: 86
Joined: 8/4/2004
Status: offline



quote:

Imagine a world that had no yardsticks. Everyone would wonder how tall things were.


I'm not sure how long ago it started ~ But ~ we STILL measure horses in "hands", no formal measuring needed.
My point is ~ people would not wonder how tall things were, they would use what they know.
i agree lables are bad, very very bad. not only in this lifestyle, but in life in general.
"You can't judge a book by it's cover". I look like the girl next door, and i live in "Vanilla~ville" People would be shocked if they knew what i liked.

Your kink might not be my kink (your definition may not be my definition)
There is no cookie cutter formula to this lifestyle, it is whatever YOU want to make it, AND that's one of the most wonderful things about being a part of it.

i know a couple slaves, and the differnce between them and myself (at this point) is they are more formal.


Disclaimer... In the writing of this post, no feelings were
intentionally meant to be hurt, no animals were harmed, and all
facts (correct or misunderstood) are based on the knowledge received.



(in reply to TallDarkAndWitty)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: submissive vs slave - 2/2/2005 7:01:36 PM   
TallDarkAndWitty


Posts: 1893
Joined: 6/12/2004
From: Rochester, NY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: panthergoddess
Was it Kenneth Star or Bill Clinton that said "Define 'it'"


Actually Clinton said "That depends on what the definition of 'is' is."

quote:


Sorry.....just had to vent in my own way......please...continue the "discussion"


Don't you fear, we shall!

Taggard

_____________________________

A most rewarding compliment is an insult from the ill-informed.


My slave: Kat (RainaVerene on the other side) and her website: RainaVerene.com

(in reply to panthergoddess)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: submissive vs slave - 2/2/2005 7:12:33 PM   
TallDarkAndWitty


Posts: 1893
Joined: 6/12/2004
From: Rochester, NY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Goodmix

I'm not sure how long ago it started ~ But ~ we STILL measure horses in "hands", no formal measuring needed.


A hand is formally four inches. Try describing a horse that is 60 inches from the ground to the top of the withers as anything other than 15 hh (hands high) and they will not know what you mean.

Taggard

_____________________________

A most rewarding compliment is an insult from the ill-informed.


My slave: Kat (RainaVerene on the other side) and her website: RainaVerene.com

(in reply to Goodmix)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: submissive vs slave - 2/2/2005 7:14:11 PM   
ProtagonistLily


Posts: 1222
Joined: 12/27/2004
Status: offline
I have an Excedrine Headache.....

Lily

_____________________________

"Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind"
~Dr. Seuss~

(in reply to TallDarkAndWitty)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: submissive vs slave - 2/2/2005 7:36:13 PM   
panthergoddess


Posts: 93
Joined: 1/11/2005
From: Bessemer City, NC USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TallDarkAndWitty

Actually Clinton said "That depends on what the definition of 'is' is."

quote:



Thanks Mr. K.I.A.

quote:

Don't you fear, we shall!

Taggard


oh I really had no doubt. *sighs*


_____________________________

"No good deed goes unpunished."

(in reply to TallDarkAndWitty)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: submissive vs slave - 2/2/2005 8:00:37 PM   
Hdvrhls


Posts: 1
Joined: 9/7/2004
Status: offline
Although numerous views have been shared, many seem to have lost sight if the original input by lil. Does a submissive instantaneously become a slave when she agrees to submit?

The answer is simply No, from my point of view.

Each relationship has its own definition of unity and boundaries set by the parties involved. Communicating the needs, desires and aspirations of those involved is vital. Often a Dom/sub relationship will morph into that of Master/slave, but there are no specific guarantees of such. Regardless of what title or role has been selected, as long as both parties are having their needs met, that is all that matters.

(in reply to panthergoddess)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: submissive vs slave - 2/2/2005 8:09:55 PM   
TheLionheart


Posts: 5
Joined: 1/1/2005
Status: offline
Either you are pregnant or you are not pregnant ? During the 'term' you are Pregnant ! You can not be just for a while ? DUH ?

Richard ...................................................

(in reply to TallDarkAndWitty)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: submissive vs slave - 2/2/2005 9:13:51 PM   
mistoferin


Posts: 8284
Joined: 10/27/2004
Status: offline
Just in case anyone is interested here is a link I found to something called the Deviant's Dictionary.

http://public.diversity.org.uk/deviant/

< Message edited by mistoferin -- 2/2/2005 9:15:59 PM >


_____________________________

Peace and light,
~erin~

There are no victims here...only volunteers.

When you make a habit of playing on the tracks, you thereby forfeit the right to bitch when you get hit by a train.

"I did it! I admit it and I'm gonna do it again!"

(in reply to TheLionheart)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: submissive vs slave - 2/3/2005 3:34:29 AM   
darkinshadows


Posts: 4145
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TallDarkAndWitty


quote:

ORIGINAL: Goodmix

I'm not sure how long ago it started ~ But ~ we STILL measure horses in "hands", no formal measuring needed.


A hand is formally four inches. Try describing a horse that is 60 inches from the ground to the top of the withers as anything other than 15 hh (hands high) and they will not know what you mean.

Taggard



Depends upon the person who measured the horse. Working with them, You can be told, 'oh, the horse is 13 hh' and when they arrive, they are at least 15. hh has always been an guide, not an exact science.

Taggard, in the end, there are definitions out there. Standard dictionaries, deviant dictionaries, kink sites, encartas... they all have the definitions of submissive and of slave. Not one person is saying that there isnt. But if you do take them at definition value as you wish to, then all slaves do not truely exist and all the rest are not submissives.

But even though there are definitions out there, that isnt really the question. The question was peoples thoughts on the statement:

quote:

"When a submissive agrees to submit to a Master she becomes his slave"


And this was a question asking personal opinion. Not for a definition. Just a simple question.

People have given responses. And as you can read, everyone has their own idea on what a sub or a slave is. Some are the same, some are completely different. But as you say, You don't care what other people think and say... Good for you... thats what the Ls is about for some people.

SSC. Your very own words. But deciding to 'force' your ideas upon everyone else just because you want a standard and decide to push it so its accepted isnt SSC in the slightest.

Gloria didn't attack anyone and although her analagy was thought provoking and for some, a little shocking, she responded to Your comment. In the way she read it, which you feel was wrong. Yet You assume You used standard words of property. But there are so many conatations to the word property, Gloria responded in the way it came across. Yet, in your own words, You dont care what people say or think... because your interested in what You decide, which is admirable. But to be so harsh, just because you don't agree isnt SSC.

Please do not see this as anything than myself trying to communicate why people are responding in the way they are. The inconsistancy of your posts is what is confusing people. First there are standard words to descibe, then there are not... first a sub and slave are different, then they can be the same... its the confusing statements thats drawing the debate away from the initial question.

When a submissive agrees to submit to a Master does she becomes his slave?

No mention of ownerships. No mention of service. No mention of times involved. Just personal opinions.


Peace and Love.


_____________________________


.dark.




...i surrender to gravity and the unknown...

(in reply to TallDarkAndWitty)
Profile   Post #: 92
RE: submissive vs slave - 2/3/2005 4:34:32 AM   
Goodmix


Posts: 86
Joined: 8/4/2004
Status: offline
quote:

A hand is formally four inches. Try describing a horse that is 60 inches from the ground to the top of the withers as anything other than 15 hh (hands high) and they will not know what you mean.


First of all i thougth a hand was generally 6 inches; however, that's besides the point ~ When they didn't have a formal measuing system, they used what they had. (that was my point)

second of all "they" would probaly have a working knowlege of horses (i don't, i was using it as an exmple) and WOULD know what you meant.




(in reply to TallDarkAndWitty)
Profile   Post #: 93
RE: submissive vs slave - 2/3/2005 5:05:06 AM   
panthergoddess


Posts: 93
Joined: 1/11/2005
From: Bessemer City, NC USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheLionheart

Either you are pregnant or you are not pregnant ? During the 'term' you are Pregnant ! You can not be just for a while ? DUH ?

Richard ...................................................


And there we have it folks!! (I like this analogy, good job!)


_____________________________

"No good deed goes unpunished."

(in reply to TheLionheart)
Profile   Post #: 94
RE: submissive vs slave - 2/3/2005 6:08:33 AM   
ruffnecksbabygir


Posts: 412
Joined: 1/4/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hdvrhls

Although numerous views have been shared, many seem to have lost sight if the original input by lil. Does a submissive instantaneously become a slave when she agrees to submit?

The answer is simply No, from my point of view.

Each relationship has its own definition of unity and boundaries set by the parties involved. Communicating the needs, desires and aspirations of those involved is vital. Often a Dom/sub relationship will morph into that of Master/slave, but there are no specific guarantees of such. Regardless of what title or role has been selected, as long as both parties are having their needs met, that is all that matters.



i agree with this statement completely..... that's, in my opinion of course, the answer to that question...realizing everyone has a different way of interpreting the lifestyle therefore different answers to lil's question, i believe that just submitting to a dom does not automatically make the person a slave.... of course, i also realize everyone lives the lifestyle the way they see fit, we all adapt our own wants and needs to it. In my eyes, a slave, and again, we are speaking of consensual slavery within the bdsm lifestyle (duh) is someone who submits completely, with no limits, to his/her owner, once that person begins setting limits on that person how can they possibly consider themselves a slave? now, again, i repeat, this is my interpretation of what a slave is....

it is my understanding of a slave within this lifestyle, it's what i have read and what i was taught by Mentors and such when i began my journey into bdsm....personally, i never considered myself a slave, but a submissive, i had limits and could not imagine just submitting to anyone in such a level that i would completely surrender all power and control over to that one person...of course, i met my One, and everything fell into place, for me..and now i am His slave and find it incredibly liberating and fulfilling for me to give all of myself, without limits or questions.....

with this i am in no way saying that one way is right or better than the other, everyone lives their life and makes their own choices and this is one of the reasons i love this lifestyle so very much, most people who are in the lifestyle dare to live life to their own standards and not to society's standards, we are being true to ourselves and our loved ones by living out our desires and needs, and how could that ever be wrong? i don't think that Taggard is saying that how anyone chooses to live their life is right or wrong, i think he is simply stating the definitions of the words we use within this lifestyle to define our roles.

When sub4hire compared owning a lawnmower and destroying or getting rid of it, to owning a slave it is easily understood why anyone that takes this lifestyle seriously would take offense to that, and i have read many of sub4hires posts and i do not question her knowledge of the lifestyle since i know she is very experienced and is a very bright and sensible woman, but i can see how Taggard would of taken that as an insult because that comes across as if the only way to go about a D/s relationship is to be a submissive because there really is no such thing as being someones slave unless you are willing to be abused and given away or sold like an old lawnmower.... if you are somenes slave you know that person and trust that person well enough to know that they will have your best interest in mind, at all times, so there should be no reason to believe that you would ever be treated like a lawnmower.

ok, that's a lil more than my 0.02 worth...

_____________________________

~hugs~
Babygirl

:Disclaimer: The above is only this slave's opinion:

"And Those Who Danced Were Thought To Be Quite Insane By Those Who Could Not Hear The Music" -- Angela Monet

(in reply to Hdvrhls)
Profile   Post #: 95
RE: submissive vs slave - 2/3/2005 7:05:22 AM   
TallDarkAndWitty


Posts: 1893
Joined: 6/12/2004
From: Rochester, NY
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheLionheart
Either you are pregnant or you are not pregnant ? During the 'term' you are Pregnant ! You can not be just for a while ? DUH ?


Ummm...just what are you saying? Obviously you can be pregnant for just a while...usually that while is 9 months for humans. In fact it is biologically impossibly to be permanently pregnant, at least today.

While you are a slave, you are a slave. What that means can vary depending on the contract negotiated between the parties, but at a minimum it must explicitly confer ownership of the slave to the owner.

Taggard

_____________________________

A most rewarding compliment is an insult from the ill-informed.


My slave: Kat (RainaVerene on the other side) and her website: RainaVerene.com

(in reply to TheLionheart)
Profile   Post #: 96
RE: submissive vs slave - 2/3/2005 7:15:04 AM   
domtimothy46176


Posts: 670
Joined: 12/25/2004
From: Dayton, Ohio area
Status: offline
As I worked my through this thread from last to first and then again from first post to last, I wieghed all the meaningful discussion carefully. My opinion is really no different now than it was before I considered all the new opinions. There is no objective measure of many of the common BDSM terms.
I know this is a point of irritation with some and I empathise, I really do, for I, too, am drawn toward exactitude. The nature of the problem is not with the desire for common understanding but with the subject matter. Emotional and intellectual understandings differ too much from individual to individual to lends themselves to objective consideration.
Even if the majority agreed upon a objective measurement for determining whether one was slave or submissive, it would have no practical meaning. Owned status is relative to what one considers ownership to entail. Service, submission, control, authority, power, rights, permission are all terms with meanings that are subject to interpretation.
One can define terms that are correct to oneself and one's relationships but the underlying meaning remains a personal interpretation. Even if we all accepted a set of definitions the discussions would continue unabated. there would remain those who determined they were slaves regardless of their failure to conform to the common definition. Nothing would change in any discernable way. Newbies would still be confused by the radically different ways various people misuse common terminology.
At the end of the day people would still seek to partner with those who believe as they do, regardless of the degree of compliance with the accepted definitions.
Timothy

(in reply to panthergoddess)
Profile   Post #: 97
RE: submissive vs slave - 2/3/2005 7:38:23 AM   
panthergoddess


Posts: 93
Joined: 1/11/2005
From: Bessemer City, NC USA
Status: offline
Taggard...

American's (overall) use the feet/yard and farenhite(sp) measuring systems, while the majority of the other countries use the metric and celcius measuring systems.

And while Im and American and use that which I am most familiar with, I can also go to any country and use their system by adapting and learning the conversions, thus making communication easier. I would hope that those that come to visit America would learn conversions from their known systems to ours while visiting to ensure best communications as well.

True our measuring systems do not match up but there is a middleground that can always be reached if one or both parites take the time to attempt to understand the others'. Neither is right or wrong, both are applicable and jsut as palpable to each person/side as the others.

As I've tried to suggest earlier....define the teminology for yourself, communicate that to the parties that you feel need to know and then allow them to learn it in an effort to communcate on your level if they wish to do so. Do not force them to see things your way (especially a group of people) unless you are their Top specifically. All that tends to do is make those you try to force more apprehensive, negative, defensive, beligerant, and just plain out no longer receptive to what you are trying to convey. And communication is an artform....neeing both parties to be both projective and receptive eaqually to each other.

_____________________________

"No good deed goes unpunished."

(in reply to domtimothy46176)
Profile   Post #: 98
RE: submissive vs slave - 2/3/2005 7:46:24 AM   
TallDarkAndWitty


Posts: 1893
Joined: 6/12/2004
From: Rochester, NY
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: domtimothy46176


Great post!!!

quote:


Even if we all accepted a set of definitions the discussions would continue unabated.


Yeah...ain't life grand?

Taggard

_____________________________

A most rewarding compliment is an insult from the ill-informed.


My slave: Kat (RainaVerene on the other side) and her website: RainaVerene.com

(in reply to domtimothy46176)
Profile   Post #: 99
RE: submissive vs slave - 2/3/2005 7:48:54 AM   
mistoferin


Posts: 8284
Joined: 10/27/2004
Status: offline
quote:

American's (overall) use the feet/yard and farenhite(sp) measuring systems, while the majority of the other countries use the metric and celcius measuring systems.


Let's not forget the online measuring system where 8 inches seems to equate to approximately 4 inches American.

Sorry.....just couldn't resist.

_____________________________

Peace and light,
~erin~

There are no victims here...only volunteers.

When you make a habit of playing on the tracks, you thereby forfeit the right to bitch when you get hit by a train.

"I did it! I admit it and I'm gonna do it again!"

(in reply to panthergoddess)
Profile   Post #: 100
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master >> RE: submissive vs slave Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.070