RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy

Join Our Community

Collarchat.com

Home Login Search

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress >> RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy

Page: << < prev 20 21 [22] 23 24 next > >>

Login

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy - 11/21/2006 1:04:43 AM

Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006
From: Stourport-England
Status: offline

Some people take it all far too seriously!

Its a web forum - whereas in real life, actions speak louder than words, here words must provide that level of communication alone.

If, as some seem to believe, dominant ladies hated submissive men, then they wouldnt want anything to do with them; let alone share so much time and space with them.

The thing is, (big secret coming up), some men like dominant ladies, and guess what? Some ladies like submissive men. If the two get together to have fun, then whats the problem I wonder?

Its meant to be fun - you know, enjoyable? If its not someone's idea of fun, then guess what? (another big secret coming up) There's no obligation to join in!

The way some people here seem to behave reminds me of those boys in the school yard, who just had to interfere with other peoples' games, you know, stealing skipping ropes, kicking balls away and that sort of thing? Thing is, when they did that in the school yard, it was very often because they wanted to play too, but were too nervous to ask.

So, I guess either join in, in the spirit of it all, or go play somewhere else?

E

_____________________________

In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.

(in reply to Arpig)

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy - 11/21/2006 1:33:35 AM

Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006
From: Stourport-England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: sissifytoserve

Suprise....you didn't realize I was wearing a bulletproof vest under my dress....

BOOM!! Carefully placed flash grenades go off in various paarts of the compound.

The renegade sissies free the (willing) prisoners from their Ego obsessed captors and take them to a safe location.

Oh drop it sissify!

You will have read that the island needs four cissy maids for domestic staff. A dress and heels all day, a bed inside the house (though only so you can serve at short notice) and youre claiming you broke in as a rescue bid?

Now, put the macho flashbangs down and report to the kitchen, there's a good girl. Coffee, red wine, tequila and tea - to be served on the verandah in five minutes.

E

_____________________________

In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.

(in reply to sissifytoserve)

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy - 11/21/2006 2:03:00 AM

Posts: 1032
Joined: 5/11/2005
Status: offline

I swear I'd zap da shit outta ma crew until they'd hmhmhmmmmmmmm of hmmmmmhmhmhmmmmmmm n I'd without doubt assist them at it

< Message edited by MissyRane -- 11/21/2006 2:14:07 AM >

(in reply to LadyEllen)

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy - 11/21/2006 5:31:28 AM

Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006
From: Stourport-England
Status: offline

hmhmhmmmmmmmm

I'm hmhmhmmmmmmmm to sunny Suffolk for two days now, work hmhmhmmmmmmmm , back on Thurshmhmhmmmmmmmm .

Play nice, and hmhmhmmmmmmmm!

E

sorry Missy, I hmhmhmmmmmmmm ya really! (at least I'd like to LOL!)

_____________________________

In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.

(in reply to MissyRane)

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy - 11/21/2006 7:39:34 AM

Posts: 1087
Joined: 2/6/2006
From: Mid-Atlantic area
Status: offline

You guys are having just way too much fun with this! You're scaring me. NOT! lol

_____________________________

(in reply to LadyEllen)

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy - 11/22/2006 1:24:33 PM

Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006
From: Stourport-England
Status: offline

Well, what happened here?

Just got back, expecting pages and pages more - and only one post more than when I left it!

Going off in a major huff now!

E

_____________________________

In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.

(in reply to DiannaVesta)

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy - 11/22/2006 2:43:10 PM

Posts: 1032
Joined: 5/11/2005
Status: offline

uh oh I gotta lick your domly shoes now?

(in reply to LadyEllen)

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy - 11/22/2006 2:58:30 PM

Posts: 75
Joined: 11/21/2006
Status: offline

This thread is rather long, so I didn't read the whole thing. I also didn't read the interview in the original post, though I intend to when I have more time.

I just wanted to post this little tidbit of information (forgive me if someone else has already mentioned this elsewhere in this really long thread).

As soon as scientists figure out how to clone humans with a reasonable success rate, men will no longer be necessary. It will probably be another decade or so before scientists actually get human cloning down-pat. And even then, the majority of people will probably still choose to reproduce the old-fashioned way. But in several hundred years or so, it's fairly plausible that the population of men will have gone down drasticly, as they will no longer be 'needed', unless it is to introduce genetic diversity. The fact that lots of women are inherently bisexual makes this even more likely.

Sad, huh? Imagine a world without men...and even the men that do exist at the time will probably be intellectually underdeveloped sex slaves of rich women. What a depressing thought.

(in reply to LadyEllen)

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy - 11/22/2006 3:08:38 PM

Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006
From: Stourport-England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Renorei

As soon as scientists figure out how to clone humans with a reasonable success rate, men will no longer be necessary. It will probably be another decade or so before scientists actually get human cloning down-pat. And even then, the majority of people will probably still choose to reproduce the old-fashioned way. But in several hundred years or so, it's fairly plausible that the population of men will have gone down drasticly, as they will no longer be 'needed', unless it is to introduce genetic diversity. The fact that lots of women are inherently bisexual makes this even more likely.

Sad, huh? Imagine a world without men...and even the men that do exist at the time will probably be intellectually underdeveloped sex slaves of rich women. What a depressing thought.

I dont share in your bleak assessment! Surely, if cloning is possible, then the males will be cloned too - so they should become cheap, and every woman could have one (or two, or more)? I foresee amendments to national constitutions - a few sex slaves should be the right of every woman, surely? LOL!
E

_____________________________

In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.

(in reply to Renorei)

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy - 11/22/2006 3:10:17 PM

Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006
From: Stourport-England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MissyRane

uh oh I gotta lick your domly shoes now?

Of course not! Its winter time here, so I'm wearing boots LOL!

I have a male for that sort of thing anyway. There has to be some use for them, after all.

E

_____________________________

In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.

(in reply to MissyRane)

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy - 11/22/2006 3:11:02 PM

Posts: 1032
Joined: 5/11/2005
Status: offline

i like men myself i enjoy their company very much and my closest friends are guys and i really don't consider myself necessarily above them
but this is just fantasy
and cloning btw is disgusting...and sucks...big time..in my opinion..and should be banned

(in reply to LadyEllen)

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy - 11/22/2006 3:48:05 PM

Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006
From: Stourport-England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MissyRane

i like men myself i enjoy their company very much and my closest friends are guys and i really don't consider myself necessarily above them
but this is just fantasy
and cloning btw is disgusting...and sucks...big time..in my opinion..and should be banned

Agreed - mind you, it might be nice if we could clone them all to be the sort of guys one might want to hang out with! But then, most of my recent experience of men is with alcoholics, so I'm a little biased on that one.

E

_____________________________

In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.

(in reply to MissyRane)

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy - 11/22/2006 4:54:25 PM

Posts: 10943
Joined: 6/22/2004
Status: offline

Ever wonder why farmers don't clone cows and such?

Because within a generation or two, they'd all be ravaged by disease. Viri and bacteria are evolving all the time, and if human beings don't evolve with them, they'll die.

So cloning human beings and dispensing with men is just a fantasy. Of course, if it gets you off, have fun with it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Renorei

As soon as scientists figure out how to clone humans with a reasonable success rate, men will no longer be necessary. It will probably be another decade or so before scientists actually get human cloning down-pat. And even then, the majority of people will probably still choose to reproduce the old-fashioned way. But in several hundred years or so, it's fairly plausible that the population of men will have gone down drasticly, as they will no longer be 'needed', unless it is to introduce genetic diversity. The fact that lots of women are inherently bisexual makes this even more likely.

Sad, huh? Imagine a world without men...and even the men that do exist at the time will probably be intellectually underdeveloped sex slaves of rich women. What a depressing thought.

(in reply to Renorei)

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy - 11/22/2006 5:03:54 PM

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

I am just gonna say if this lady is such a big deal, she needs a name change, Elise don't cut it, all i am gonna think about is evaporated milk, no matter what she says.

Call her Thistle or Hazel or anything but Elise.

Ron

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to Lordandmaster)

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy - 11/22/2006 5:31:06 PM

Posts: 1016
Joined: 8/30/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

Agreed - mind you, it might be nice if we could clone them all to be the sort of guys one might want to hang out with!
E

How boring.

Didn't Hitler try to do this with his belief in the "superior species"?

So much for diversity.

Soundslike you want a Ken Doll....not a partner with his own soul.

< Message edited by sissifytoserve -- 11/22/2006 5:42:17 PM >

_____________________________

A great mind must be androgynous
Samuel Coleridge

The uniting of the feminine and the masculine is the highest form of human development Carl Jung

(in reply to LadyEllen)

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy - 11/22/2006 7:39:09 PM

Posts: 75
Joined: 11/21/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

Ever wonder why farmers don't clone cows and such?

Because within a generation or two, they'd all be ravaged by disease. Viri and bacteria are evolving all the time, and if human beings don't evolve with them, they'll die.

So cloning human beings and dispensing with men is just a fantasy. Of course, if it gets you off, have fun with it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Renorei

As soon as scientists figure out how to clone humans with a reasonable success rate, men will no longer be necessary. It will probably be another decade or so before scientists actually get human cloning down-pat. And even then, the majority of people will probably still choose to reproduce the old-fashioned way. But in several hundred years or so, it's fairly plausible that the population of men will have gone down drasticly, as they will no longer be 'needed', unless it is to introduce genetic diversity. The fact that lots of women are inherently bisexual makes this even more likely.

Sad, huh? Imagine a world without men...and even the men that do exist at the time will probably be intellectually underdeveloped sex slaves of rich women. What a depressing thought.

The main reason why cloning isn't in practice more these days is because it's outlandishly expensive and for every successful cloning attempt, there are perhaps hundreds of unsuccessful attempts. The cost of cloning an animal tends to exceed the benefits.

But you do raise an interesting point. Evolving viruses and diseases will be an interesting problem for scientists to solve, once cloning becomes more widespread and not so taboo. It will probably take them a long way to figure out how to resolve this issue, but I firmly believe they will be able to one day. Then again, I'm quite the optimist when it comes to science. I am rarely willing to consider anything impossible.

As far as female supremacy goes, I don't really know where I stand on it. In my organizational behavior class, we had to read this study about how women in leadership positions in business consistently performed better than men. Are we inherently superior, or were these women merely trying harder, because they've had to overcome glass ceilings in the past? Or maybe both? I don't know. Women are rapidly surpassing or catching up to men in almost all academic areas, and there are now more female college students than male. But how much of this is society and how much is inherent? The world may never know.

I've always considered myself to be a rather openminded person. And part of that openmindedness is accepting that supremacy of one gender over another or one race over another might be possible. I mean, if there are clear and obvious physical differences, why do we consider it such a massive stretch that there might be mental differences as well? Society has placed a taboo on the mere suggestion that some people might be naturally "better" than others, but personally I think it's an area worth exploring. *prepares for imminent flames*

(in reply to Lordandmaster)

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy - 11/22/2006 8:20:44 PM

Posts: 492
Joined: 10/13/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Renorei
I've always considered myself to be a rather openminded person. And part of that openmindedness is accepting that supremacy of one gender over another or one race over another might be possible. I mean, if there are clear and obvious physical differences, why do we consider it such a massive stretch that there might be mental differences as well?

The concept of "race" as a means of dividing one population from another is pretty much dead in anthropology these days; we haven't been able to find a single human trait which exists only in one group of people and not in others, internally or externally. Also, most of us have realized that the whole idea of "race" is a cultural construct, which is designed to sort people into categories for political action. It has no real scientific basis.

Gender is a cultural construct as well, which is why the definitions of a "proper" man and a "proper" woman and the "natural" way that people of either sex think and behave changes all the time. From one time period to another, from one place to another, constructions of gender show infinite variety--which is the one sure sign that these ideas are adapted to circumstances at best, completely arbitrary at worst.

The reason that female supremacy is an interesting idea, from my point of view, has nothing to do with "proving" that women are physically or bio-chemically superior to men. Yes, we have certain traits that are interesting and can be exploited to our advantage--but so do males. Big whoop.

The real reason I support female supremacy as an idea is that I actually believe women are NOT inferior to men, and therefore are just as entitled to rule the world as men have been for the last 10,000 years--if not more so. Since who gets to run things in a given society is completely arbitrary anyway, why shouldn't it be women rather than men? Even if we couldn't do better at ruling the world than men have, we sure as HELL couldn't do worse.

All the men have to do is learn to enjoy it and find some way to get ahead. I recommend that they learn to obsess about their physical appearance, spend a lot of time in beauty parlors and consider some form of implants which will make gals like me more inclined to put money in their g-strings, when they're stripping naked for me in a club on a Friday night.

--M

(in reply to Renorei)

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy - 11/22/2006 8:38:59 PM

Posts: 10943
Joined: 6/22/2004
Status: offline

Yeah, they'll solve that one right after taking care of cold fusion and the perpetual motion machine.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Renorei

But you do raise an interesting point. Evolving viruses and diseases will be an interesting problem for scientists to solve, once cloning becomes more widespread and not so taboo. It will probably take them a long way to figure out how to resolve this issue, but I firmly believe they will be able to one day. Then again, I'm quite the optimist when it comes to science. I am rarely willing to consider anything impossible.

(in reply to Renorei)

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy - 11/22/2006 9:01:49 PM

MzMia

Posts: 5333
Joined: 7/30/2004
Status: offline

I have read many/most of the posts here. Dianna, LdyHugs and so many have made my point so eloquently.

I am a Black Female Supremacist, I share many/most of Elise's and Dianna's views.
I am always fascinated by the LACK of tolerance for diverging points of view in this community.
It is really amazing the amount of intolerance and small mindedness of many people.
Are people not allowed to live this lifestyle the way THEY see fit?
Who is in charge of all acts BDSM?
Many here are into many things that I find repulsive.
BUT, I do not judge them nor do I see the need to put them down.
At what point does this community just say, LIVE AND LET LIVE?

_____________________________

Namaste'
To Each His/Her Own
"DENIAL ain't just a river in Egypt." Mark Twain

What's your favorite fetish?
"My partner's whisper"--bloomswell

(in reply to DiannaVesta)

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy - 11/22/2006 9:39:00 PM

Posts: 1016
Joined: 8/30/2006
Status: offline

Not when you wish/seek to exploit others and put yourself above others claiming "im better than you"..you are "inferior".

Its a big load of horse doo-doo.

Female supremacy sucks
Black supremacy sucks
White supremacy sucks
Christian supremacy sucks

Anyone who thinks they are "superior" to another and call others "inferior"
can go take a giant leap into lake bullshit for all I care.

< Message edited by sissifytoserve -- 11/22/2006 10:00:15 PM >

_____________________________

A great mind must be androgynous
Samuel Coleridge

The uniting of the feminine and the masculine is the highest form of human development Carl Jung

(in reply to MzMia)

Page: << < prev 20 21 [22] 23 24 next > >>

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress >> RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy

Page: << < prev 20 21 [22] 23 24 next > >>

Jump to:

New Messages	No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages	Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages	Locked w/o New Messages

Post New Thread

Reply to Message

Post New Poll

Submit Vote

Delete My Own Post

Delete My Own Thread

Rate Posts

Collarchat.com © 2024

Terms of Service

0.185