RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy

Join Our Community

Collarchat.com

Home Login Search

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress >> RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy

Page: << < prev 4 5 [6] 7 8 next > >>

Login

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy - 11/12/2006 6:32:50 PM

Posts: 20
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

Tell Us then..why do you wear Female Clothing? Why do you feel the need to associate yourself with such Feminine things? Females will always be the Superior sex as long as males like you aspire to be just like Us. Crossdressers are nothing but closet Female Supremacists. I know, I have a friend who wears panties.

(in reply to sissifytoserve)

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy - 11/12/2006 6:35:33 PM

Posts: 5094
Joined: 11/15/2005
From: Toronto
Status: offline

I'll do this one piece by piece:

quote:

ORIGINAL: majidah

Females come to restore. We come to bring about Peace.

Often, yes. As do males. I had, on another post, a pretty good list of women who came to do everything but restore. Alas, I'm not about to go find it. I can tell you though, that Queen Isabella didn't do all too much restoring, Milosevic was mostly doing his wife's bidding, Macbeth's wife was pretty damn fucked up, and lots of others, whom I can't think of. Historically, women have been less overtly in power, but the saying "Behind every strong man there is a strong woman" also means behind every evil man, there is an evil woman.

Besides, have you ever seen two women in the workplace who don't get along and have their own cliques? I have, and it aint pretty.

quote:

males...are all about seek kill and destroy...whether it's intentional or not

Right. As we have seen in history, many men are out there to kill and destroy. However, with men in power, cities have been built, we have gone to the moon, and no matter how destructive we are, we are at a positve balance.

quote:

Just think of the millions of sperm wasted through masturbation..thousands of potential Female Goddesses, washed down the cold ceramic toilet..Seek, kill, and destroy.

Could the same argument not be made of women ovulating? Actually, since sperm is created whether we masturbate or not, and only the tiniest fraction could ever possibly become a person anyway, percentually, women waste a lot more.

Pregnant, barefoot, and in the kitchen, say I!

Yours,

benji

< Message edited by gooddogbenji -- 11/12/2006 6:46:24 PM >

_____________________________

Prevent global warming. Stop burning patchouli.

(in reply to majidah)

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy - 11/12/2006 6:36:53 PM

Posts: 492
Joined: 10/13/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: gooddogbenji

Often, yes. As do males. I had, on another post, a pretty good list of women who came to do everything but restore. Alas, I'm not about to go find it. I can tell you though, that Queen Isabella didn't do all too much restoring, Milosevic was mostly doing his wife's bidding, Macbeth's wife was pretty damn fucked up, and lots of others, whom I can't think of. Historically, women have been less overtly in power, but the saying "Behind every strong man there is a strong woman" also means behind every evil man, there is an evil woman.

My personal favorites are Elizabeth Bathory and Ilse Koch.

--M

(in reply to gooddogbenji)

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy - 11/12/2006 6:37:53 PM

Posts: 5094
Joined: 11/15/2005
From: Toronto
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Morrigel

My personal favorites are Elizabeth Bathory and Ilse Koch.

--M

My personal favourite is my ex, the vile bitch, but that really is personal.

Yours,

benji

_____________________________

Prevent global warming. Stop burning patchouli.

(in reply to Morrigel)

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy - 11/12/2006 6:38:53 PM

Posts: 2299
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline

Dear sissifytoserve, Ladies and Gentlemen;

Correctly so, truth may not be a pleasant business. However, in my mind's eye it can be delivered in a more pleasant manner, without stripping the vast negative contained within that 'truth.'

History has contained a lot of 'ugly' truths, where men have claimed their superiority by skewing facts and philosphy to suit the agendas of one or many.

Women through the ages have been surpressed and by those who claimed 'male superiority.' From Bible times and before, to the present. Women have been judged inferior because they lacked a penis. To this day, women in the work force get 3/4 of the pay a man does for the same job. To this day, a good many still believe a woman's place is barefoot, pregnant and subserviant to men. That said, there have been men, who have a good sense of superiority, have given women a hand up in civilization, as to empower them and to join with them, as to just be given a chance of equal respect and equal chance.

History provides women, a series of documented proof of 'suffering' under the hands of men, cloaked in religious, governmental, military and or Imperialism, based on male superiority. One ugly period was during the Inquisition. Over 2,000 women, children and babies were thrown into the Nuremberg ovens, burned alive. Women have, through history been treated with prejudice, bias, hate and such.
So, I can understand why women can be angry. The question is--what lessons of the past can we take and make a more positive future of it all.

In my mind's eye, I am responsible for my own superiority and not because of my genitals but, by the content of my character.

In the scene context, some individuals enjoy the tilted power, of being in a female surpremacy relationship. It is their cup of tea. It makes them both happy. If unhappy, the parties can part company.
Agree or disagree with the individual philosophy; it really boils down to treat everything with the same tolerances as you request, extended back.

Respectfully submitted for consideration,
Lady Hugs

(in reply to sissifytoserve)

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy - 11/12/2006 6:40:53 PM

Posts: 1016
Joined: 8/30/2006
Status: offline

You have all the answers...you already know everything.

you are "superior" after all.

Let me get back to my "inferior"..life..thanx.

In fact...now that i think about it....Its possible your type of thinking is the cure for my crossdressing altogether.

Never thought that was possible untill today.

Agreed Goodogbenji....and what about the mythical KALI..the (female) Destroyer?

< Message edited by sissifytoserve -- 11/12/2006 6:51:17 PM >

_____________________________

A great mind must be androgynous
Samuel Coleridge

The uniting of the feminine and the masculine is the highest form of human development Carl Jung

(in reply to majidah)

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy - 11/12/2006 6:45:51 PM

Posts: 1604
Joined: 5/6/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: majidah

Just think of the millions of sperm wasted through masturbation..thousands of potential Female Goddesses, washed down the cold ceramic toilet...

(Now see...I don't look at it quite that way...I consider all of it "research")

_____________________________

Small deeds will always mean more than large intentions.

(in reply to gooddogbenji)

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy - 11/12/2006 6:50:10 PM

Posts: 2400
Joined: 6/27/2004
From: Austin, TX
Status: offline

I wonder if some of the disagreements here stem from different interpretations of what female supremacy means. I define female supremacy differently based on whether it is under a BDSM context or a general context.

In the general context, I see female supremacy to mean every woman is in or should be in a supreme position over every man in society at large. I disagree with this notion.

Within BDSM, I see it to mean a paradigm in which females have a supreme role and a higher social status. I enjoy this idea and find it to be one of my core BDSM interests. Some of the best moments I have had have been at gatherings where men, or I alone, served a group of women.

However, I have a disclaimer. For me, BDSM spans different parts of me and is central to my romantic and sexual expression. I do not have to engage in romantic or sexual behavior but I do need to feel a certain way about the person and the situation even to be submissive in a non-sexual manner. It is important for me to feel socially attracted or neutral, and feel comfortable about space. How I feel about a given situation would depend on how I feel about the activity in question and whether I feel appropriate chemistry with the person in question. For example, the threshhold for the chemistry is low for fetching a drink. For other activities, it may be different.

I am interested to hear how others define female supremacy.

Cheers,

Sea

(in reply to slavekal)

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy - 11/12/2006 6:59:35 PM

Posts: 2299
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline

Dear undergroundsea, Ladies and Gentlemen;

I do agree with your observations. In my mind's eye, regardless if the topic is about female surpremacy, BDSM, cooking, serving tea, fixing an automobile; there will always be those with a different view on such things.

In my mind's eye, is being focused on my own world and what works for me.

In relationships, it is a mixing of the ingredients that makes a recipe for success, where two or more can join with what is more common, rather than what is most uncommon.

Respectfully submitted for consideration,
Lady Hugs

(in reply to undergroundsea)

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy - 11/12/2006 7:09:59 PM

Posts: 2400
Joined: 6/27/2004
From: Austin, TX
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: majidah
Females will always be the Superior sex as long as males like you aspire to be just like Us. Crossdressers are nothing but closet Female Supremacists. I know, I have a friend who wears panties.

Discussions about this topic often lead to a distinction between female superiority and female supremacy. One reason the two are sometimes interpretted interchangably is because some female supremacists believe the superiority is why the supremacy should exist.

Do you feel women are superior to men in general? If so, I am curious what your criteria is to determine whether one person is superior to another.

Cheers,

Sea

< Message edited by undergroundsea -- 11/12/2006 7:31:50 PM >

(in reply to majidah)

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy - 11/12/2006 7:13:45 PM

Posts: 492
Joined: 10/13/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: undergroundsea

I am interested to hear how others define female supremacy.

I define female supremacy as the absolute and inalienable right of every woman to control her own body and destiny, to choose her own place in the scheme of things--in the various realms of work, family, intimate relationships, or worship of higher powers--and to do whatever is necessary to achieve happiness as she personally defines it.

A woman who chooses to live in passionate devotion at the feet of a man she chooses to worship is every bit as "supreme", so far as I am concerned, as a femme domme bending over the bound ecstatic victim at her feet. You cannot yield power unless you have it in the first place...and power, whether wielded or yielded, is something all women have.

--M

< Message edited by Morrigel -- 11/12/2006 7:15:02 PM >

(in reply to undergroundsea)

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy - 11/12/2006 7:17:18 PM

Posts: 1087
Joined: 2/6/2006
From: Mid-Atlantic area
Status: offline

I'm sleepy. I'll be back tomorrow to make comment. Nite all and very kinky dreams.

_____________________________

(in reply to undergroundsea)

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy - 11/12/2006 7:17:32 PM

Posts: 5094
Joined: 11/15/2005
From: Toronto
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Morrigel

I define female supremacy as the absolute and inalienable right of every woman to control her own body and destiny, to choose her own place in the scheme of things--in the various realms of work, family, intimate relationships, or worship of higher powers--and to do whatever is necessary to achieve happiness as she personally defines it.

A woman who chooses to live in passionate devotion at the feet of a man she chooses to worship is every bit as "supreme", so far as I am concerned, as a femme domme bending over the bound ecstatic victim at her feet. You cannot yield power unless you have it in the first place...and power, whether wielded or yielded, is something all women have.

--M

Replace female with male in there, and you have a definition for both female and male supremacy, which could co-exist.

So what makes the female supreme?

Yours,

benji

_____________________________

Prevent global warming. Stop burning patchouli.

(in reply to Morrigel)

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy - 11/12/2006 7:20:16 PM

Posts: 2400
Joined: 6/27/2004
From: Austin, TX
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: orfunboi
You want to see a male supremacist site, trot over to the Gor boards and take a look around.

Gor is indeed based on male supremacy, and is lifestyle or kink based on a series of fantasy books. It is also frowned upon and considered a stepchild of BDSM by many. I myself do not subscribe to Gor because of the rigid roles it assigns.

So I think your reference to Gor does not help to make an argument for female supremacy.

On that note, what do you see to be different between Gor and female supremacy aside from the swap of gender roles?

Cheers,

Sea

(in reply to orfunboi)

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy - 11/12/2006 7:36:27 PM

Posts: 492
Joined: 10/13/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: gooddogbenji

Replace female with male in there, and you have a definition for both female and male supremacy, which could co-exist.

Bingo.

--M

(in reply to gooddogbenji)

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy - 11/12/2006 7:38:32 PM

Posts: 1087
Joined: 2/6/2006
From: Mid-Atlantic area
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Morrigel

quote:

ORIGINAL: gooddogbenji

Replace female with male in there, and you have a definition for both female and male supremacy, which could co-exist.

Bingo.

--M

Doesn't suprise me you agree with this.

_____________________________

(in reply to Morrigel)

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy - 11/12/2006 7:41:06 PM

Posts: 5094
Joined: 11/15/2005
From: Toronto
Status: offline

So then who is supreme? Supremacy is a relative term, so in order for someone to be supreme, another must be below.

Don't get me wrong, I like the idea, I just don't see it as any form of supremacy.

Yours,

benji

_____________________________

Prevent global warming. Stop burning patchouli.

(in reply to Morrigel)

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy - 11/12/2006 7:41:37 PM

Posts: 10943
Joined: 6/22/2004
Status: offline

Then calling it "supremacy" is misleading, to say the least. Normally, referring to the supremacy of a class or kind implies that other classes or kinds cannot attain the same heights. What you've been talking about sounds more like "living the fullest life one can."

Edited to add: Shit, benji and I said essentially the same thing within 30 seconds of each other.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Morrigel

quote:

ORIGINAL: gooddogbenji

Replace female with male in there, and you have a definition for both female and male supremacy, which could co-exist.

Bingo.

< Message edited by Lordandmaster -- 11/12/2006 7:42:08 PM >

(in reply to Morrigel)

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy - 11/12/2006 7:41:48 PM

Posts: 492
Joined: 10/13/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DiannaVesta

Doesn't suprise me you agree with this.

You type really well for someone who's asleep.

--M

(in reply to DiannaVesta)

RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy - 11/12/2006 7:48:39 PM

Posts: 492
Joined: 10/13/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

Then calling it "supremacy" is misleading, to say the least.

The word only seems misleading because it has been tainted by association with too many people in the last 100 years who were so weak and lacking in real identity that they could not achieve their own greatest good without casting others down and depriving them of their rights based on some arbitrary accident of birth.

A whole lot of people need to actually read Neitzsche, rather than the Cliff's Notes or Beyond Good and Evil For Dummies.

--M

(in reply to Lordandmaster)

Page: << < prev 4 5 [6] 7 8 next > >>

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress >> RE: Elise Sutton Interviews ME - Female Supremacy

Page: << < prev 4 5 [6] 7 8 next > >>

Jump to:

New Messages	No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages	Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages	Locked w/o New Messages

Post New Thread

Reply to Message

Post New Poll

Submit Vote

Delete My Own Post

Delete My Own Thread

Rate Posts

Collarchat.com © 2024

Terms of Service

1.041