LadyEllen
Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006 From: Stourport-England Status: offline
|
I'm no expert FP - but I thought that they didnt need familial history to do genetic testing for this pupose, because what they look for is markers in the single genetic sample for possible problems. They only need your sample for this, and though family history may give a pointer for stuff to look for, its not required. Since you mention offspring, then its important to get your partner's genetics looked at too; there are some genetic conditions which only emerge if two people sharing a certain code get together. The two parents have no problem, but combined their genetics produce the problem. Additionally, you might want to consider the insurance implications of getting a genetic test done, as your insurance might become invalid if you dont reveal to the insurer all relevant information known to you; if you take a test and discover a propensity for say, heart disease, then this becomes relevant information which your insurer would like to know when assessing risk and determining premia. However, in some places I believe there are statutory protections in place as regards revelation to insurers, so you might want to check out your legal position before informing insurers too! E
_____________________________
In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.
|