darkinshadows
Posts: 4145
Joined: 6/2/2004 From: UK Status: offline
|
quote:
beth is MY "no limits" slave. As I've previously posted, the reality is she does have limits - MINE! Those limits would include not allowing someone to use her who would see "no limits" as a personal challenge. What dominance is needed to prove that point? Is there "glory" in the process of breaking a person? In all our physical encounters, some that people perceive as "heavy" or "edge" I have NEVER struck beth full strength. It is the same philosophy I had in casual play before beth. I didn't see the need for safe words because I knew the person I was with, she trusted me, and hearing her use her safe word, wasn't a session goal. A person, without mental incapacity, who identifies themselves as "no limits" is seeking a trusting partner. They want to give up control. They want confidence. They are not seeking someone who can prove they are not really "no limits". Whilst I understand your point, I think my worry is what the actually statement implies. I, myself, would be considered a 'no limits' as I belong to Demon. And I can understand that beth is understood by Yourself as such as well. But what concerns me is the amount of 'no limit 'slaves that exist who are not owned, or proclaim to not want a steady or serious relationship. Or the Dominants who want 'no limit' slaves/subs but who look for only a play partner. Too me, that strikes a red flag. It's like a person who calls themself a 'Master' without 'owning' or calling oneself a 'slave' without being 'owned'... Just a personal opinion of mine.
_____________________________
.dark. ...i surrender to gravity and the unknown... |