Stephann
Posts: 4214
Joined: 12/27/2006 From: Portland, OR Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: SusanofO P.S. I have a question for you - how is this question asked in this thread even slightly jiving with the idea that one of a Dominant's primary responsibilities is to keep his submissive safe? - Susan Hello Susan, I'm not entirely sure that you were responding to me or not, but I'll take a stab at your statements. Well - as the OP mentioned, practically speaking, it's not gonna matter - because if this did go to trial - you're gonna be convicted of attempted manslaughter (or possibly murder - or worse), and so, you can contemplate the "real answer" from behind prison bars. The 'real answer' and the legal answers don't always match up. The real answer is that if I can afford a top notch lawyer, it won't matter how wrong I 'really' was. BDSM in the lifestyle is rife with these examples; if a person has a massive heart attack and dies during a scene, is the dominant legally responsible? Criminally liable? Even if she's only tickling him with a feather duster? I don't determine other people's morals for them, but will say that for me (or anyone I'd play with) the answer is that this IS, in fact, immoral. Taking risks this huge just smacks to me of a certain disdain for life in general, and I wouldn't particpate in actvitiy with anyone who had an attitude I consider that wanton towards human life. The issue doesn't revolve around taking risks. We take a greater risk of accidental death when we climb behind the wheel of a care than we do engaging breath play. I don't consider driving to be disdain for life, but the odds are that every single driver will be involved in at least one serious accident in the course of their life. Why would you willingly engage in an activity that you -know- will eventually result in serious consequences? Instead of pretending there are no risks in our activities, we assume responsibility for all of our actions, and their inherent risks. If we spend the time and effort to learn the risks, we are better prepared to minimize them. Defensive driving courses are a good example. A CPR course and some extensive research into the effects of oxygen deprivation would be good ways to reduce the risks associated with breathplay. The fact is, many BDSM related activities carry some degree of risk. The question isn't grounded in the morality of risk; the question is grounded in the consent to that risk. P.S. I have a question for you - how is this question asked in this thread even slightly jiving with the idea that one of a Dominant's primary responsibilities is to keep his submissive safe? Not every top shares that idea. Not every bottom wants them to. We are not the BDSM police; people will do exactly what they wish to do in their homes, no matter how much we shake our fingers at them and say "don't." Instead of railing about the morality of minors having sex, we do them a greater service ensuring they have access to education and condoms. But that's a whole other ball of wax. Take care, Stephan
_____________________________
Nosce Te Ipsum "The blade itself incites to violence" - Homer Men: Find a Woman here
|