Aswad
Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Grlwithboy I have seen and have reason to believe that one can reduce risk and still deliver a good negative stimulus to a healthy and average individual by placing said collar around their thigh. That makes sense, depending on the electrode placement and the strength of the shock. I don't think you'd want to risk the current running through the inside (medial side) of the thigh, given the placement of the femoral artery etc. With sufficient current to the anterior side, you could also end up contracting the quadriceps, which may lead to some "interesting" injuries, but that's probably less likely. I'm no doc, though, so I can't say. quote:
I hope if they're not playing with it in that manner at present they're at least open to that adjustment. For all I care, they can use a chainsaw for discipline, if that's their thing. But they should at least be aware of the risk, and decide whether it is acceptable to them or not. With a collar around the thigh, you should get plenty response, but some may be willing to risk it around the neck. quote:
I don't especially have a fetish for dominant chicks with criminal records and small enclosed cages, if you catch my drift. ~nod~ I don't mind a criminal record, but if I were to bottom for someone, I wouldn't want the item on it to be murder as a sex crime (explaining the distinction between D/s and sex to an average vanilla jury is probably one step easier than climbing Mt. Everest, I imagine). And I wouldn't let my nephandi play with such a person, either.
_____________________________
"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind. From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way. We do." -- Rorschack, Watchmen.
|