tsatske
Posts: 2037
Joined: 3/9/2007 From: Louisville, KY Status: offline
|
Yes, but that is not an answer that would work for everyone - it would just, as Mercnbeth said, legitamize what I already am. But I am interested in all this emphaises on 'consent'. This is a hypothetical question - a fantasy construct for the purpose of exploring certain things in the form of a 'thought experment'. In the construct she provided, she said - 'would you sign yourself over into slavery to a Master you had chosen?' I am not saying that anyone who said no 'should' have said yes - the answer given by each person is fine. I am just curious about all this 'non-consent' talk. Where is the non-consent in this fictional scenario? And - just curious - would any specific laws regarding this fictional slavery change anyones answers? If, for instance, after having chosen the particular person to sign yourself over to, you could, or could not, be sold to anyone of that Masters chosing? If the law protected certain rights? If the 'contract' was fully enforcable but could be time limited if both parties desired that written in? ect, ect.
_____________________________
“If you never did you should. These things are fun and fun is good” ~Dr. Seuss quote
|