Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Antisemiticism on the collarme boards.


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Antisemiticism on the collarme boards. Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Antisemiticism on the collarme boards. - 1/21/2013 12:59:15 PM   
thezeppo


Posts: 441
Joined: 11/15/2012
Status: offline
@Moonhead

I would say Palestinian nationalism was fully formed by 1919 at the latest, and that's only because I'm being generous. This certainly incorporated antizionism, indeed Palestinian and Arab nationalism is seen by many to be borne entirely out of antizionism. I personally don't agree with that assessment but I would never deny it as a factor. I genuinely don't think its empirically possible to argue that it was the creation of the Israeli state in 1948 that created Palestinian nationalism or antizionism.

@Powergamz

Despite it being my statement you have quoted I'm inclined to believe you are calling moonhead an holocaust denier rather than myself. For what its worth, I agree that one of the biggest attractions of Zionism for European Jews before WW1 was the chance to escape persecution and antisemitism.

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 101
RE: Antisemiticism on the collarme boards. - 1/21/2013 1:00:56 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thezeppo
I would say Palestinian nationalism was fully formed by 1919 at the latest, and that's only because I'm being generous. This certainly incorporated antizionism, indeed Palestinian and Arab nationalism is seen by many to be borne entirely out of antizionism. I personally don't agree with that assessment but I would never deny it as a factor. I genuinely don't think its empirically possible to argue that it was the creation of the Israeli state in 1948 that created Palestinian nationalism or antizionism.

So who would they be bombing if Israel wasn't there?

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to thezeppo)
Profile   Post #: 102
RE: Antisemiticism on the collarme boards. - 1/21/2013 2:02:50 PM   
thezeppo


Posts: 441
Joined: 11/15/2012
Status: offline
@moonhead
Can you be a bit more specific? Do you mean if the zionist movement had never existed or if the 1948 state had never been created? I've said more than once that I don't consider 1948 a starting point for this debate, in fact its pretty much the point I'm trying to make.

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 103
RE: Antisemiticism on the collarme boards. - 1/21/2013 2:07:32 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
I mean if there wasn't an Israel.
Would nearby Jihadists be paying the Palestinians to bomb the Mohammed approved state they'd be living in now, or are Syria funding them purely because they don't like Jews?

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to thezeppo)
Profile   Post #: 104
RE: Antisemiticism on the collarme boards. - 1/21/2013 2:29:03 PM   
Powergamz1


Posts: 1927
Joined: 9/3/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thezeppo

@Moonhead

I would say Palestinian nationalism was fully formed by 1919 at the latest, and that's only because I'm being generous. This certainly incorporated antizionism, indeed Palestinian and Arab nationalism is seen by many to be borne entirely out of antizionism. I personally don't agree with that assessment but I would never deny it as a factor. I genuinely don't think its empirically possible to argue that it was the creation of the Israeli state in 1948 that created Palestinian nationalism or antizionism.

@Powergamz

Despite it being my statement you have quoted I'm inclined to believe you are calling moonhead an holocaust denier rather than myself. For what its worth, I agree that one of the biggest attractions of Zionism for European Jews before WW1 was the chance to escape persecution and antisemitism.



I've agreed multiple times with what you've posted about the antisemitism/anti-zionism link going back to the end of the 19th centry, and I provided extra examples that it is an unbroken chain from past to present..
As an addendum I debunked the antisemitic 'It all started with Israel' meme, because that has become so successful that it invariably pops up to muddy any attempt to have a rational discussion.

As far as which posters here are merely parroting that meme because they don't know the facts, and which ones do know better and are spreading it anyway, I haven't addressed that.
I would be quite surprised if anyone could prove that the number of anti-semitic people posting here is zero... and I'd be equally surprised if most anti-semites would admit to it, in favor of the Racism v2.0 approach which is prevalent on the internet today.

In any case, it needs to be said again and again that the valid complaints against the Israeli government and people (land grabs, water manipulation, politics as usual) need to be kept clearly separate from the massive pile of agit-prop and inflammatory rhetoric that is based on falsehoods.

The most obvious reason is that in a stalemate such as Israel/Palestine, repeating edited or slanted history merely fuels those on the Israeli side who would say 'See? They are lying about us and about history again, because they want to kill us all just like before'

That cycle needs to be broken before anything else can happen, and sunshine is the only disinfectant up to that task.





_____________________________

"DOMA is unconstitutional as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons that is protected by the Fifth Amendment" Anthony McLeod Kennedy

" About damn time...wooot!!' Me

(in reply to thezeppo)
Profile   Post #: 105
RE: Antisemiticism on the collarme boards. - 1/21/2013 2:36:44 PM   
Baroana


Posts: 1480
Joined: 11/13/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Powergamz1

quote:

ORIGINAL: thezeppo

@Moonhead

I would say Palestinian nationalism was fully formed by 1919 at the latest, and that's only because I'm being generous. This certainly incorporated antizionism, indeed Palestinian and Arab nationalism is seen by many to be borne entirely out of antizionism. I personally don't agree with that assessment but I would never deny it as a factor. I genuinely don't think its empirically possible to argue that it was the creation of the Israeli state in 1948 that created Palestinian nationalism or antizionism.

@Powergamz

Despite it being my statement you have quoted I'm inclined to believe you are calling moonhead an holocaust denier rather than myself. For what its worth, I agree that one of the biggest attractions of Zionism for European Jews before WW1 was the chance to escape persecution and antisemitism.



I've agreed multiple times with what you've posted about the antisemitism/anti-zionism link going back to the end of the 19th centry, and I provided extra examples that it is an unbroken chain from past to present..
As an addendum I debunked the antisemitic 'It all started with Israel' meme, because that has become so successful that it invariably pops up to muddy any attempt to have a rational discussion.

As far as which posters here are merely parroting that meme because they don't know the facts, and which ones do know better and are spreading it anyway, I haven't addressed that.
I would be quite surprised if anyone could prove that the number of anti-semitic people posting here is zero... and I'd be equally surprised if most anti-semites would admit to it, in favor of the Racism v2.0 approach which is prevalent on the internet today.

In any case, it needs to be said again and again that the valid complaints against the Israeli government and people (land grabs, water manipulation, politics as usual) need to be kept clearly separate from the massive pile of agit-prop and inflammatory rhetoric that is based on falsehoods.

The most obvious reason is that in a stalemate such as Israel/Palestine, repeating edited or slanted history merely fuels those on the Israeli side who would say 'See? They are lying about us and about history again, because they want to kill us all just like before'

That cycle needs to be broken before anything else can happen, and sunshine is the only disinfectant up to that task.







Yup.

(in reply to Powergamz1)
Profile   Post #: 106
RE: Antisemiticism on the collarme boards. - 1/21/2013 2:53:30 PM   
thezeppo


Posts: 441
Joined: 11/15/2012
Status: offline
you need a point of divergence more specific than that.

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 107
RE: Antisemiticism on the collarme boards. - 1/21/2013 3:49:05 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Powergamz1

The guilty flee, where none pursueth.
If you aren't a revisionist, then I wasn't talking about you, or to you, and you've got no complaint.

If you are simply whining because someone would dare bring factual and documented history in to counter agit-prop, then too damn bad.



I was just pointing out what you were doing. Too damn bad indeed.

(in reply to Powergamz1)
Profile   Post #: 108
RE: Antisemiticism on the collarme boards. - 1/22/2013 3:05:52 AM   
thezeppo


Posts: 441
Joined: 11/15/2012
Status: offline
Just to be clear, I would consider antizionism and antisemitism two different phenomena. Antizionism in Arabic countries was based around culture clashes (i.e. Jewish landowners not being aware of the Arabic custom of sharing Arable land) and was borne out of the Ottoman Tanzimat reforms in the 19th Century. There were tangible feeling that Zionism was a threat. Benedict Anderson suggests this is one of the precursors to a national consciousness being formed, which is why I keep going back to it. Antizionism was not inherently racist. Antisemitism in the 19th century seems to be based around the idea that Jewish population is united, its 'Jewish' identity transcends any other identities (French, German) and that it is against us. That is racist.

I think there have been myths on both sides, the notion that the Palestinians are invented has done them a lot of harm. Ultimately there is right and wrong on both sides. A modernist approach to nationalism would treat Zionist and Palestinian identity as having formed within about a 20 year period of one another. An ethnosymbolic approach would trace both identities back to before 1000AD. This is exactly why the polemical debates about Israel usurping the land in 1948, or about Jihadist bombers, are going to get people absolutely nowhere.

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 109
RE: Antisemiticism on the collarme boards. - 1/22/2013 4:43:59 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thezeppo

Just to be clear, I would consider antizionism and antisemitism two different phenomena

So should anybody who isn't a cretin. The only reason there's any confusion between the two is that the Israeli government has spent the last thirty years deliberately muddying the water so that they can claim anybody who finds their conduct in the occupied territories objectionable is an antisemite.

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to thezeppo)
Profile   Post #: 110
RE: Antisemiticism on the collarme boards. - 1/22/2013 5:17:14 AM   
Powergamz1


Posts: 1927
Joined: 9/3/2011
Status: offline
They are two sets with a significant overlap.

And the fingerprints of others are all over every single shell casing.

quote:

ORIGINAL: thezeppo

Just to be clear, I would consider antizionism and antisemitism two different phenomena. Antizionism in Arabic countries was based around culture clashes (i.e. Jewish landowners not being aware of the Arabic custom of sharing Arable land) and was borne out of the Ottoman Tanzimat reforms in the 19th Century. There were tangible feeling that Zionism was a threat. Benedict Anderson suggests this is one of the precursors to a national consciousness being formed, which is why I keep going back to it. Antizionism was not inherently racist. Antisemitism in the 19th century seems to be based around the idea that Jewish population is united, its 'Jewish' identity transcends any other identities (French, German) and that it is against us. That is racist.

I think there have been myths on both sides, the notion that the Palestinians are invented has done them a lot of harm. Ultimately there is right and wrong on both sides. A modernist approach to nationalism would treat Zionist and Palestinian identity as having formed within about a 20 year period of one another. An ethnosymbolic approach would trace both identities back to before 1000AD. This is exactly why the polemical debates about Israel usurping the land in 1948, or about Jihadist bombers, are going to get people absolutely nowhere.



_____________________________

"DOMA is unconstitutional as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons that is protected by the Fifth Amendment" Anthony McLeod Kennedy

" About damn time...wooot!!' Me

(in reply to thezeppo)
Profile   Post #: 111
RE: Antisemiticism on the collarme boards. - 1/22/2013 5:23:02 AM   
Powergamz1


Posts: 1927
Joined: 9/3/2011
Status: offline
The *only* reason?

So the Holocaust had absolutely zero to do with Zionism gaining traction among European Jews? The pogroms?

No connection of any kind? Those things are just Israel 'muddying the waters'?


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead


quote:

ORIGINAL: thezeppo

Just to be clear, I would consider antizionism and antisemitism two different phenomena

So should anybody who isn't a cretin. The only reason there's any confusion between the two is that the Israeli government has spent the last thirty years deliberately muddying the water so that they can claim anybody who finds their conduct in the occupied territories objectionable is an antisemite.



_____________________________

"DOMA is unconstitutional as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons that is protected by the Fifth Amendment" Anthony McLeod Kennedy

" About damn time...wooot!!' Me

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 112
RE: Antisemiticism on the collarme boards. - 1/22/2013 5:39:48 AM   
thezeppo


Posts: 441
Joined: 11/15/2012
Status: offline
Like I said, discourse has impacted both sides. Zionism is a political movement just like any other. There have been antizionist Jews just as there have been antisemitic zionists. Ultimately I would like to see a historiography that makes more of the British role, from Palmerston to the end of the Mandate period.

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 113
RE: Antisemiticism on the collarme boards. - 1/22/2013 5:59:57 AM   
thezeppo


Posts: 441
Joined: 11/15/2012
Status: offline
@powergamz

Yes there is a significant overlap, as I have said antisemitism in Europe was key to the attraction of zionism. I think that was one of the prime motivators of Jewish movement towards Ottoman Palestine, more so than ethnosymbolism.

(in reply to thezeppo)
Profile   Post #: 114
RE: Antisemiticism on the collarme boards. - 1/22/2013 3:40:26 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Powergamz1

The *only* reason?

So the Holocaust had absolutely zero to do with Zionism gaining traction among European Jews? The pogroms?

No connection of any kind? Those things are just Israel 'muddying the waters'?




Absolutely zero, except in Germany due to the well organised propoganda machine.

(in reply to Powergamz1)
Profile   Post #: 115
RE: Antisemiticism on the collarme boards. - 1/22/2013 4:13:02 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thezeppo

Like I said, discourse has impacted both sides. Zionism is a political movement just like any other. There have been antizionist Jews just as there have been antisemitic zionists. Ultimately I would like to see a historiography that makes more of the British role, from Palmerston to the end of the Mandate period.


I think the events from Palmerstons times up until WWI or just before wasnt about a Jewish Homeland. The involvement in Egypt was a response to the French ( and asked for by Egypt ) The wars in Crimea and Afghanistan were to block the Russian attempts at expansionism. Settlements after WW1 were made with an eye soley on trading opportunities. yes, revisionism is all well and good, and in todays age it wasnt right. Back then though, it was common policy for every major nation.

When the Ikhwan tried to advance into Jordan, British forces drove them back. Britain had been keen on the idea of a Jewish Homeland. Lord Rothschild was well connected and also leader of the British Zionist Movement. More importantl was the link between Chaim Weizmann, A zionist leader, and Lord Balfour. This went back to Balfours days in the Admiralty, when Weizmann developed a way to ferment Acetone, which was used in the weapons industry.

Britains white paper going back on the Balfour agreement was a direct result of the Arab Revolt of 1936-39. With WW2 looming I dont see there was a viable alternative, geo-political events meant we had to keep Iraq, Saudi and Egypyt as allies.

(in reply to thezeppo)
Profile   Post #: 116
RE: Antisemiticism on the collarme boards. - 1/22/2013 5:36:14 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Powergamz1
As far as which posters here are merely parroting that meme because they don't know the facts, and which ones do know better and are spreading it anyway, I haven't addressed that.
I would be quite surprised if anyone could prove that the number of anti-semitic people posting here is zero... and I'd be equally surprised if most anti-semites would admit to it, in favor of the Racism v2.0 approach which is prevalent on the internet today.




So where are the guidelines to who is whom?

There are a couple of people on this board who launched a label anything antisemite that disagrees with the status quo.

Such as showing that picture of that kick ass olympic pool for the prisoners use located a few feet from their barracks. That was Auschwitz no less. Several other camps had large pools as well.

How does that sort of activity generate and justify an antisemite label? Especially since the long known facts are cast in concrete?

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Powergamz1)
Profile   Post #: 117
RE: Antisemiticism on the collarme boards. - 1/23/2013 2:09:17 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
Is this stupid thread still current?

Obviously those who equate criticism of a State that practices apartheid and ethnic cleansing - Israel - with a form of racism - anti-Semitism - haven't  got a clue what either racism is, what apartheid is, what ethnic cleansing is, what genuine anti-Semitism is or they are engaged in an either naive or mischevious attempt to silence criticism of that nasty terrorist racist State.  If they did have a clue, they wouldn't make such ridiculous fools of themselves.

Any one who either glossses over or defends Israeli apartheid and ethnic cleansing automatically loses the right to accuse others of racism.  So trying to connect political criticism of Israel with anti-Semitism is laughably stupid at best, and,  at worst, the vilest most repulsive hypocrisy.

< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 1/23/2013 2:15:35 AM >


_____________________________



(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 118
RE: Antisemiticism on the collarme boards. - 1/23/2013 2:33:01 AM   
thezeppo


Posts: 441
Joined: 11/15/2012
Status: offline
Yes absolutely, Cham Weizmann was very much involved in the decision to broadcast the Balfour Declaration. I can't lay my hands on it to quote it directly, but I read a paper recently that claimed he was basically the reason that it was broadcast. Levene was the author, it was in the English Historical Review so I'm not sure whether people would be able to see it. He used empirical examples to show that the British genuinely believed that every Jew was united, pro-Zionist, and pro-German. Weizmann overstated the appeal of Zionism amongst world Jewry (at that time) and the British, desperate to end the war, believed him.

Link here, but I don't think anyone will be able to access it; http://ehr.oxfordjournals.org/content/CVII/CCCCXXII/54.citation

Revisionism is a particularly useless accusation when it comes to history. There is a need in this area for some revising. Writers such Rashid Khalidi and Haim Gerber are changing perceptions all of the time as more and more contemporary Arabic source material becomes available. I think you will be familiar with Said and Orientalism, or maybe Beshari Doumani? I would recommend Salim Tamari's mountain against the sea to anyone. There has been a concerted effort to rewrite the Palestinians back into history, as they have been marginalised since the 19th Century ("A land without a people....") The whole point of history is that it isn't a line of truth running through to the present. There are the facts, and then there are interpretations of the facts. Interpretations change with time, with culture, and that isn't revisionism. Or if it is, then history is one great big pile of revisionism anyway.

I am claiming the same as you anyway - in the 19th century the British acted in the interests of the Empire. I am not a Zionist, although I can appreciate why I may have come across as one. I genuinely think both sides of the debate have at least a reasonably legitimate claim to the territory itself. The point I have been making all along is that by 1948 the two sides are completely defined by their opposition to one another, there is no hope of finding any common ground if one locates the debate there or afterwords. However, there is common ground if one views World War 1 and the Mandate period as Britain screwing both sides into the ground to further her own interest. Maybe it is too late to change anything now, but at least it would be a positive step in a debate which hasn't budged an inch in years.

To me, Britain is portrayed in an inconsistent way during the mandate period. Herbert Samuel was good enough at his job to become High Commissioner of Palestine yet is still viewed as weak. Britain formed an alliance with Zionists as well as betraying the Balfour agreement. Britain usually supported Zionism except for when it didn't, and that was due to antisemitic officers. Does it not sound more logical to say Britain said one thing sometimes, and another thing at different times, with the intention of maintaining her own interests?

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 119
RE: Antisemiticism on the collarme boards. - 1/23/2013 2:43:56 AM   
thezeppo


Posts: 441
Joined: 11/15/2012
Status: offline
Are you claiming Auschwitz was a holiday destination? I have had the opportunity to meet and speak with two holocaust survivors (as part of a group) and hear firsthand their experience. The swimming pools didn't come up.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Antisemiticism on the collarme boards. Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.234