dreamlady
Posts: 737
Joined: 9/13/2007 From: Western MD Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: tamaka What you don't understand Peon, Nobody here does. . . possibly due to not being fluent - ne parle pas - in the moronic. quote:
is that by placing yourself in the position of a sub, you are inferior to every other man that doesn't. . . . Which begs for translation in tamakanese: 1. Do you believe that "placing yourself in the position of a sub" makes every non-submissive man somehow superior to you, women in general, or just to submissive women? 2. (a) Is it your considered opinion that military men who are subordinate to their superior officers also fall into this broad category of "being inferior [in manhood] to every other" man in uniform who outranks them? 2. (b) If not, then why not, according to your own [skewed] logic? 2. (c) Where does this leave military women in terms of social hierarchy? Are they somehow "less womanly" than the average civilian woman if they take command of others? Does this extend to the arena of law enforcement, etc.? 3. (a) Do you see yourself as being superior, equal or inferior to other women who do not self-identify as their "Master's hole" as you have declared yourself to be nothing more than? Hint: You may avail yourself of whatever definition you feel applies, either according to ResidentSadist's post, or to your own implication of substandardness. 4. Paradoxically, do you see yourself as being superior to (a) non-submissive women and/or (b) submissive men in worth and value, because of the "Subblier Than Thou" stick you have shoved up one of your Master's holes? DreamLady
_____________________________
Love is born with the pleasure of looking at each other, it is fed with the necessity of seeing each other, it is concluded with the impossibility of separation. ~José Marti
|