thompsonx
Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006 Status: offline
|
ORIGINAL: Nnanji I'm not sure where your $7,000 came from. From Thompson's link, Tesla battery for about $7,000 included $1,000 for installation which I'd do myself and an inverter. My inverters run about $3,000 each. You need two that can stack if you want 110 and 220 in this country. No you do not dumbass. zantrex and others make 120/220 inverters. So say, according to Thompson's link, $3,000 for a 13.5 kWh battery that must be replaced every three years. The batteries last 20+ years not three years dumbass. My lead acid batteries provide about 52 kwh's for about $3,300 No they do not liar. and last seven to ten years from personal experience. All your experience is in your dreams. As I said, energy storage is where R&D should be spent now. When you rely on the batteries 52kwh for four times the energy and two to three times the life cycle is a much better buy. In Teaks link, the battery for the plant was $50 million and since it's the same technology, just bigger, that three year life cycle is going to get expensive fast. Where are you getting this three year life cycle? Again, from Thompson's link, a house (it says individual but I'll assume household) uses about 30kwh per day. A 13.5 kWh battery just isn't going to last long on cloudy days. So the household will be running generators or living off the power company. And, replacing $3,000 batteries even three years would buy a lot of electricity from the power company. Your bullshit argument only works with made up facts. Jesus you are phoquing stupid.
|