Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login 

RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN Page: <<   < prev  102 103 [104] 105 106   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN - 7/19/2013 10:27:19 PM   
Kana


Posts: 6676
Joined: 10/24/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Do you not consider the degree of culpability an issue in these cases?

Culpability? In the disseminating of an idea?
I believe in the right of a free people to make free decisions. Our country is founded on that belief.
What people do with an idea is on them. That's the right,and responsibility, that comes with citizenship. We all, theoretically at least, are rational actors that make informed decisions the majority of the time.

The problem with that,of course,is part of that process requires accurate data from which to base the decision.

Well that,and the minor detail that Americans are just plain Bonkers.

I swear it's true-we're so schizo. We have this part of us that's all Puritan and the other is the Euro lords wild and crazy spendthrift wastrel third sons who settled (Read were cast out by families who could no longer tolerate the shame of being associated with the dilettantes) this country seeking a quick fortune and adventure. We're culturally dichotomous, which wouldn't be so bad, save that the polarities are diametric opposites :-)

ETA-I'm not talking hate speech or starting riots.I'm thinking more MLK here

< Message edited by Kana -- 7/19/2013 10:29:40 PM >


_____________________________

"One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die. "
HST

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 2061
RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN - 7/19/2013 10:30:33 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kana


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Do you not consider the degree of culpability an issue in these cases?

Culpability? In the disseminating of an idea?
I believe in the right of a free people to make free decisions. Our country is founded on that belief.
What people do with an idea is on them. That's the right,and responsibility, that comes with citizenship. We all, theoretically at least, are rational actors that make informed decisions the majority of the time.

The problem with that,of course,is part of that process requires accurate data from which to base the decision.

Well that,and the minor detail that Americans are just plain Bonkers.

I swear it's true-we're so schizo. We have this part of us that's all Puritan and the other is the Euro lords wild and crazy spendthrift wastrel third sons who settled (Read were cast out by families who could no longer tolerate the shame of being associated with the dilettantes) this country seeking a quick fortune and adventure. We're culturally dichotomous, which wouldn't be so bad, save that the polarities are diametric opposites :-)

"Americans have been thrown out of every decent country in the world"
Stripes
"we already threw all the misfits out of our country, sent them back to England"
Quigly Down Under

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to Kana)
Profile   Post #: 2062
RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN - 7/19/2013 10:44:26 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

Culpability? In the disseminating of an idea?


No, not in that, in the self defense/SYG cases we are starting to see.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Kana)
Profile   Post #: 2063
RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN - 7/19/2013 11:06:26 PM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline
SYG was not used. SYG is the core of the self defense laws in Fla, and the wording from SYG was used in charging the jury. Straight self defense was used by Z.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kana

quote:

Your view of SYG might well change if you were mugged.

I've been mugged.
But I wouldn't need SYG-Like Z, I'd claim self defense.



_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to Kana)
Profile   Post #: 2064
RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN - 7/19/2013 11:41:53 PM   
Kana


Posts: 6676
Joined: 10/24/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

Culpability? In the disseminating of an idea?


No, not in that, in the self defense/SYG cases we are starting to see.

Huh?When have I ever come out in any we re SYG?
If you're asking if I think Z was culpable for defending himself (if that were the case) no,of course not. Same as I'd feel were the positions reversed and what evidence existed indicated that Z attacked M and M happened to have a legal gun carried under a CCW.

As for any future SYG, hey, peeps don't like it, get the laws changed.
There are ways to do that w/o resorting to these tactics. We happen to be fortunate enough to live in a nation where there are avenues and ways to do this. But this, spending time discussing SYG is somewhat like fiddling while Rome burns. In that I mean, SYG is a small piece of the larger gun war.In exchange for this minor exchange, for which victory is no way assured, major major legal protections are being trampled, rights that form the core of our legal system, ideals that stand at the root of our nation.
Is the price worth it?
What good does it do a man to gain his dream if he loseth his soul in the process?

Not to mention there's something to be said for taking the moral high ground. I'd gives credibility where it might be otherwise lacking. It also has an tangible effect in public opinion on a worldwide basis.Their nonviolence stance gave Gandhi and King authority, bequeathed a certain righteousness to their respective causes. It was stance that history has approved of, that's for sure.

< Message edited by Kana -- 7/19/2013 11:45:39 PM >


_____________________________

"One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die. "
HST

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 2065
RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN - 7/19/2013 11:59:47 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

Huh?When have I ever come out in any we re SYG?
If you're asking if I think Z was culpable for defending himself (if that were the case) no,of course not. Same as I'd feel were the positions reversed and what evidence existed indicated that Z attacked M and M happened to have a legal gun carried under a CCW.


My point is he put himself into the position to have to defend himself. Even if we believe completely the story Z gave, he isnt blameless in the scenario. Even the jurors saw that and they werent influenced by media during the trial. In that line of thought, many are objecting to the notion that "Zimmerman is innocent".

quote:

As for any future SYG, hey, peeps don't like it, get the laws changed.


That's what they are calling for.

quote:

What good does it do a man to gain his dream if he loseth his soul in the process?


No one lost their soul more than T that night.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Kana)
Profile   Post #: 2066
RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN - 7/20/2013 12:26:53 AM   
Kana


Posts: 6676
Joined: 10/24/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

Huh?When have I ever come out in any we re SYG?
If you're asking if I think Z was culpable for defending himself (if that were the case) no,of course not. Same as I'd feel were the positions reversed and what evidence existed indicated that Z attacked M and M happened to have a legal gun carried under a CCW.


My point is he put himself into the position to have to defend himself. Even if we believe completely the story Z gave, he isnt blameless in the scenario. Even the jurors saw that and they werent influenced by media during the trial. In that line of thought, many are objecting to the notion that "Zimmerman is innocent".

quote:

As for any future SYG, hey, peeps don't like it, get the laws changed.


That's what they are calling for.

quote:

What good does it do a man to gain his dream if he loseth his soul in the process?


No one lost their soul more than T that night.


Well, the blunt fact is that whenever one carries a weapon,pretty much any kind of dangerous weapon, one better be ready to use it, because if there's an altercation and you ain't, there's a large chance it ends up your ass.

That said, a case can be,and has been made, that the gun was the only thing potentially saving Z from massive harm that night. Not only was the case made, but a jury found it at least reasonably convincing from at least one (and that's all it takes in the end) jurors account.

We tend to downplay such things but people die accidentally all the time in fights. I have a buddy I grew up with, got in a fight when he was in the army, a bar brawl with lots of people involved, just a wild fracas, in the middle of it, trying to make his way to the door, he was confronted by, and struck a guy, not a great shot but a good one. Which would have been no big deal,but the guys heads clipped the bar on the way down and he died in the ambulance.
My buddy, no killer save by freak of fate, served five hard ass years for a crime he had no intention of committing.

When a person commits an act of violence, they are in essence rolling the dice nothing truly bad comes of it, that they can limit/control the damage/situation. Which is an entirely erroneous assumption.

Not to mention that people seem to be taking for granted getting your head slammed on the cement.That shit can fuck you up.Not just can cause permanently damage, but the entire process is kinda jarring. It's difficult to think rationally while your brains are being scrambled. Then there's the fact that violence, real sudden in your face violence is fast and hard and terrifying as all get out. Expecting entirely coherent decision making at such a juncture is somewhat unreasonable.

Point blank-cut it any way one likes, if M attacked Z, he rolled the dice that the cat he was attacking wasn't armed (The flip side of the carry coin. And I'll note that in Fla,where peeps are insane even by American standards, the chance a cat is carrying is pretty high. They are gun crazy in the sunshine state. A nice side effect of the ongoing campaign of fear that the American public has been barraged with). And if that's the case, I have little sympathy for him.Take the law into your own hands, cross the line into criminality, especially violent criminality, then you take that risk.

Finally, I think a lot of people make an assumption that Z would have acted in a different fashion had he not been carrying.That might be true. Might not.
Who know?
But w/o any basis in which to ground that belief, it's specious speculation.

Could Z have acted differently? Sure.
So could M.
In this, there's nothing different from any other tragedy.Lots and lots of missed paths, wrong roads taken, poor decisions,all of which lead to a final result.



< Message edited by Kana -- 7/20/2013 12:27:58 AM >


_____________________________

"One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die. "
HST

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 2067
RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN - 7/20/2013 2:01:04 AM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline
"If Trayvon Martin was armed, he might still be alive" -- Wayne LaPierre, EVP NRA ( July 18, 2013 Private Remarks at Speech before NAFM ( National Association of Firearms Manufacturers.)

_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to Kana)
Profile   Post #: 2068
RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN - 7/20/2013 2:24:33 AM   
Wendel27


Posts: 162
Joined: 5/5/2013
Status: offline
 How does putting yourself in the position detract from one's innocence Tazzy? If Zimmermna's story is entirely true then what is he guilty of? Walking after someone a little bit?

If this was a rape victim who had walked through a dark park in a short skirt would would they somehow be part culpable in the crime against them? What is Zimmerman walked through the Bronx with wads of cash taped to his clothes if he was mugged is he partly culpable?

I don't know if what Zimmerman has said is true. If it is however the idea he's guilty in any way seems remarkably unfair. It also seems a searing indictment of society that walking after someone a short distance to ask them what they are doing is apparently just cause to violently assault them.

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 2069
RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN - 7/20/2013 3:37:17 AM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Guess I took you off hide in time to prove you have no idea what I will respond too.
Please point out were I said it was evidence.
However it is closer to evidence than the absurd argument that Zimmerman should have given him a ride and that this would have solved everything.


You never had me on hide, since you have replied to previous posts.

Since you are unable to understand a clearly written post. The word "Evidence" refers to your inability to find any regards your claim about Martins girlfriends comments. You have taken half of what she said, and made up the rest to suit yourself. You have no proof what he was thinking, none, niet, nada.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 2070
RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN - 7/20/2013 3:42:50 AM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Powergamz1

You may be misreading. When Politesub says that something doesn't exist, the universe obligingly blinks it out of existence.
It simply isn't there anymore, and can be safely ignored. Like dead Indians.

Watch:
quote:

MORGAN: And he was freaked out by it?

JEANTEL: Yes. Definitely after I say may be a rapist, for every boy, for every man, every -- who's not that kind of way, seeing a grown man following them, would they be creep out? So you have to take it -- as a parent, when you tell your child, when you see a grown person following you, run away, and all that.

Would you go stand there? You going to tell your child stand there? If you tell your child stand there, we're going to see your child on the news for missing person.

(APPLAUSE)

MORGAN: Let's take another break.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1307/15/pmt.01.html

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

You forget that martin's girlfriend said he attacked Zimmerman out of homophobia imagine the reaction if Zimmerman had invited him into his truck.


Evidence ? I call bullshit so I dont expect any credible reply.

Edited to add what I am not expecting.


Guess I took you off hide in time to prove you have no idea what I will respond too.
Please point out were I said it was evidence.
However it is closer to evidence than the absurd argument that Zimmerman should have given him a ride and that this would have solved everything.




More bollocks from you........ Nothing in your post is proof........ For two ex Law Enforcement guys you and Bama cant seem to distinguish truth from bullshit.

(in reply to Powergamz1)
Profile   Post #: 2071
RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN - 7/20/2013 3:44:57 AM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

You may be misreading. When Politesub says that something doesn't exist, the universe obligingly blinks it out of existence.
It simply isn't there anymore, and can be safely ignored. Like dead Indians.

Note he said a credible response. In politesubese credible = agrees with him.



Nope dopey, credible means not made up bullshit. Good god, I dont call you stupid for nothing.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 2072
RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN - 7/20/2013 3:50:40 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

If this was a rape victim who had walked through a dark park in a short skirt would would they somehow be part culpable in the crime against them? What is Zimmerman walked through the Bronx with wads of cash taped to his clothes if he was mugged is he partly culpable?


I am really sick and tired of this rape victim scenario. This would be akin to a woman walking late at night (if you want to call 7 pm late), realizing she was followed, and turning to attack her follower instead of waiting for him to attack first. He would have killed her.

Would we be having any part of this discussion????

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Wendel27)
Profile   Post #: 2073
RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN - 7/20/2013 4:05:39 AM   
Wendel27


Posts: 162
Joined: 5/5/2013
Status: offline
 Why are you sick and tired of it? You're arguing that legal activity makes one culpable in a crime perpetrated against you. If what Zimmerman said is true then at what point did he engage in illegal behaviour? 

Doing something that is, perhaps, ill advised doesn't make a crime any more acceptable. In the rape scenario for instance the victim's clothes or choice of location doesn't make a shred of difference in terms of the criminal's decision to rape.


(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 2074
RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN - 7/20/2013 4:09:30 AM   
tammystarm


Posts: 3045
Joined: 7/26/2006
Status: offline
^^^^
For once I agree with tazzy.


Utter BS! Now I wasn't inside the kids head, but I'm pretty sure he wasn't thinking rape.
How many of you men here ever think a guy might rape you, seriously.

R.I.P. Martin
And my unsolicited advice to Zimmerman , run away from the U.S.A., and try and lead a normal life you'll never get here.

_____________________________

~~Queen of duct-tape~~
~~Emotionally delusional~~

~~somebody pour me my nebuitol and hand me my drink~~



(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 2075
RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN - 7/20/2013 4:12:52 AM   
tammystarm


Posts: 3045
Joined: 7/26/2006
Status: offline
And for some of you, I swear, as long as you mention Martin or Zimmerman in a sentence somewhere ( or at least pretend too care about this event), this thread is nothing more than you being able to freely say what you will about others here.

Sad, sick, pathetic!

_____________________________

~~Queen of duct-tape~~
~~Emotionally delusional~~

~~somebody pour me my nebuitol and hand me my drink~~



(in reply to tammystarm)
Profile   Post #: 2076
RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN - 7/20/2013 4:13:12 AM   
Wendel27


Posts: 162
Joined: 5/5/2013
Status: offline
 I'm genuinely not sure what post yours refers to Tammy. I've never suggested Martin feared he was about to be raped. I must confess i'm not sure how you've come that conclusion either. I used the example of a rape to demonstrate that a victim's behaviour, if legal, does not water down or legitimise a crime against them... I wasn't suggesting Zimmerman had wads of cash strapped to him while strolling down the Bronx either, it was an analogy.

(in reply to tammystarm)
Profile   Post #: 2077
RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN - 7/20/2013 4:16:57 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

That said, a case can be,and has been made, that the gun was the only thing potentially saving Z from massive harm that night. Not only was the case made, but a jury found it at least reasonably convincing from at least one (and that's all it takes in the end) jurors account.


A harm he put himself into. Back a rat into a corner long enough and the rat os going to come out fighting. I would have felt I was backed into a corner had I been hiding in the bushes and someone was looking for me.

quote:

We tend to downplay such things but people die accidentally all the time in fights. I have a buddy I grew up with, got in a fight when he was in the army, a bar brawl with lots of people involved, just a wild fracas, in the middle of it, trying to make his way to the door, he was confronted by, and struck a guy, not a great shot but a good one. Which would have been no big deal,but the guys heads clipped the bar on the way down and he died in the ambulance.
My buddy, no killer save by freak of fate, served five hard ass years for a crime he had no intention of committing.


So now it has to be by intent? You seem to believe, despite what I have been saying, that I think Z is still guilty of murder. Not the case. Maybe you should read these posts again with that in mind.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/marjorie-cohn/zimmerman-jury-mistakes_b_3618132.html



_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Kana)
Profile   Post #: 2078
RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN - 7/20/2013 4:18:28 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

Why are you sick and tired of it? You're arguing that legal activity makes one culpable in a crime perpetrated against you. If what Zimmerman said is true then at what point did he engage in illegal behaviour? 


What illegal activity did T commit before being cornered like a rat? Self defense is now illegal? Or is it only legal for some people and not all people?

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Wendel27)
Profile   Post #: 2079
RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN - 7/20/2013 4:19:31 AM   
tammystarm


Posts: 3045
Joined: 7/26/2006
Status: offline
It wasn't directed towards you

_____________________________

~~Queen of duct-tape~~
~~Emotionally delusional~~

~~somebody pour me my nebuitol and hand me my drink~~



(in reply to Wendel27)
Profile   Post #: 2080
Page:   <<   < prev  102 103 [104] 105 106   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN Page: <<   < prev  102 103 [104] 105 106   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarspace.com — BDSM Community & Personals  •  Browse BDSM Profiles  •  Female Dominants  •  FemDom Dating  •  Foot Worship  •  Bondage Community  •  BDSM Glossary  •  Join Free

Collarchat.com © 2026
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109