Termyn8or
Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005 Status: offline
|
Geez, I'll never bring this up again here. BUSH SAID IN PUBLIC, TO THE AMERICAM PEOPLE IN PUBLIC "it's Ok to have a dictator, as long as I am the dictator". If that is not an exact quote it is damn close, I saw it. I watched him speak those words on a video. Appoint a Czar or two, that is the most fucking offensive thing to me that they could do. And they control all of the major media, so most of what you have heard has been "properly" filtered. It is bad enough when you view the world through your own eyes and draw conclusions based on your own internal filters, which flavors the input to be pleasant to you. Of all people, Charlie Manson described it quite well in an interview decades ago. Now couple this with their filtering, which is done solely to keep them in power and the money machine working, most people have a very narrow spectrum to view in life. No wonder it is so fucked up. Manson described it as a film negative or the like, which was between your perception and your mind. I think that was quite astute actually, and I do believe it is true.To be less blunt, everything you see in life is seen through your own personal perspective, and that perspective is very powerful in shaping your opinions. Now couple this with the fact that through the US media they can control what you see and hear. Hugo=bad, Castro=bad. Well how the fuck do they stay in power for decades when they are so bad, especially with the pressure our neocrats apply to them ? The answer is that we have been lied to, over and over, and for decades, every chance 'they' get. They say "Chavez is a threat because he exports a form of radical populism", that is their own fucking words. Perhaps we need something like that in the US and get rid of these crooks. You see my friends (I think I'll throw that in from time to time so your know) radical populism to them is to have the People choose their leaders, instead of............think about it. And people afraid to vote against Chavez ? I don't buy it. They could band together and make it to the polls. If there were enough popular support against Bush, what do you think would happen here ? Talk trickery ? How about the notices sent out telling democrats to vote a day later because voter turnout was so great ? Who do you think did that ? I don't buy any of it, those notices existed and were passed out, I saw a few. I don't buy any of it any more, and to my last dying breath, I will try to enlighten people. Someone prove me wrong, I can take it. But you only proved me wrong on a few points, and beware the reply, you indeed can be proven wrong as well. And I want it all out here in public, for the world to see. The people who really rule the US, for whom Bush is about reduced to spokesperson, want control of the entire globe. Any government that does not cooperate with the stealing from their People is either a radical populist, a dictator or some other type of demon they will invent for you. And people forget way too quickly. Some member of CM, the number of which is into five figures, has got to have some inkling of an idea to sway influence to a populist candidate, or at least somebody like Ron Paul. We can't start at the top, that would be unreasonable to expect. It must be done on a federal level though, or we are never going to be liked in the world again. Any ideas at all that might work, put them on the table. I'll help. I'll raise ya one mind. That I will pledge. You (anyone) come up with a plan that is viable, I will help you. I offer that in full good faith, and that is something, if you have even the beginnings of a plan. You let me know, I will not dwell on it here. I don't wish to brag, but what I have to offer is substantial. I am adept in the ways of conflict and argument, and I will only say this much about the intelligence level I have toi offer, on an IQ test I skipped almost every word jumble question, which brought me down to 160. But I know I can outthink two people in an adversarial situation and diffuse the argument, but with real gains. You do this by exploring the issues, not ignoring or subliminating them. I have known this for a long time, and I have lots of practice. I want to help, I want to make the world better, a lasting change. I can only do this a few people at a time right now, and while that is indeed the start, it is not enough. That media outlet in Venezuela did alot more than voice dissident opinions, they purposely and specifically did not act in the public interest. You see, the way I see it, even with all that said, if the lawfully elected President Hugo Chavez Frias allows that media outlet to contiunue to operate, it is proof to the world that he is indeed not a dictator. And if dissidents were dissuaded from voting, why didn't they broadcast that ? I want pictures. But you can't even trust pictures anymore. The media could say "There are the Chavez supporters beating up a dissident voter" and how would we know ? It could be an undercover drug bust for all we know. It could be Mexican drug cartel operatives beating Venezuelan narcs for all we know. Just like in Arab countries, we can not read the signs at those protests. If I'm wrong, let's take Venezuela and make it a state, and just take the oil. And whatever happens do not let a Bush run the operation. Bushes could not find oil in Texas and have no intention of looking in Alaska no matter how many pipelines they build. And if there was no oil in Texas, they should've known, they had all these studies done and decided to drill anyway. Another bandage on a local economy, and look what it cost. What are the latest figures on office space vacancy in Texas ? The fact of the matter is this, I would prefer Hugo Chavez Frias as President of the US than Bush any day. At this stage of the game, I'd rather take my chances with Hitler than Bush. I just don't think it can get much worse. This country is great, I love it and want to see it do well. But the people who get elected, by hook or by crook are destroying it. I take exception to that, do you ? T
|