Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Anal hooks


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Bondage Gear and Apparel >> RE: Anal hooks Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Anal hooks - 7/19/2007 9:16:45 AM   
Lewcifer


Posts: 126
Joined: 5/22/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad
Just thought I'd add that the picture actually seems to feature someone who has had a labia removal, possibly also a clitoridectomy. One wonders why that hasn't engendered comments, though I'm not complaining.


It hasn't engendered comments because, typically, people are hypocrites.  They'll judge something as unhealthy while  engaging in other unhealthy practices themselves.  Some will go even further, supporting their stance with what can best be described as utter nonsense, in a classic display of ignorance.

On another note, I commend Y/you for astutely noticing the penetration took place from the vagina, and not into it.

< Message edited by Lewcifer -- 7/19/2007 9:19:53 AM >


_____________________________

I am fortunate... My wife is also My friend, lover and slave.

(in reply to Aswad)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Anal hooks - 7/19/2007 9:30:05 AM   
Archer


Posts: 3207
Joined: 3/11/2005
Status: offline
The direction of the hook makes some but not all the difference.
The open whle and the next movement of te bowel concerns me as much if not more than the direction of the hooking which if you're going to do it they chose the lesser of the infection potentials, but it still has not gotten anywhere near the level of safety I need for my own ethics to be met.

The draw back trough issue could be avoided by simply pushhing the hook all the way through since the hook is S shaped. (something I reccomend to folks who prick themselves with needles after they have been through their bottom's skin to minimize risk of transfers of infection)

However additional items of concern for me are the fact that the hook appears to be galvanized. Zinc is not an approved of material for hooks used in piercing which are generally stainless steel.

I'll still hold to my thought that nearly professional medical level awareness of infection would be required for ths specific hooking in order to meet RACK standards. Awareness means informed awareness not casual awareness.

< Message edited by Archer -- 7/19/2007 9:32:29 AM >

(in reply to Lewcifer)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Anal hooks - 7/19/2007 9:37:06 AM   
Lewcifer


Posts: 126
Joined: 5/22/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: zindyslave
I have no problems with someone using hooks in suspension play it is the simple fact that a woman most likely will get a serious infection from having an open path from the vagina and rectum. I know that most kinks in the lifestyle are medically unacceptable but the fact of the matter is, most would not do something similar to the picture. Esspecially if they had known people that had went through an infection that is caused by feces in the vagina. I am not disparaging anyone for their kink I was just stating that it isn' t healthy, some people might not have known that...that is why I mentioned it. Everyone is entitled to there kinks but as these boards sometimes help people learn then I think it is best to point out the problems that can arise from said activity so they can be aware of the risks involved.


The point remains... your characterization of this particular kink as unhealthy, while attempting to characterize bruising (and now, apparently suspension play) as healthy is disingenuous and hypocritical.  You clearly stated bruising was not unhealthy, because everyone gets bruised unintentionally.  People also get hit by cars unintentionally... that, per-se, does not make it a healthy activity.  The fact remains (please feel free to factually refute it) - intentional bruising for the sake of bruising (such as during flogging, caning, spanking, etc) is medically unhealthy.

That being said, you object to fissure hooking because if done wrong it can lead to possible vaginal infection.  Yet you condone needle play and body hook suspension.  Using your same arguments - needle play, if done wrong, can lead to a build-up of scar tissue or worse if blood vessels are pierced.  Likewise, body hook suspension carries the same risks, along with the possibility of tearing and associated infection.

You further attempt to justify your statement by saying that some people on this board might not realize fissure hooking isn't healthy.  Yet you make no attempt to notify them of the unhealthy effects of flogging, spanking, or other activites you seem to partake in... I've even searched your previous posts.  Your recent comments lead me to believe you are convinced these activities are healthy.  Nothing can be further from the truth, and self-denial is no substitute for risk awareness.

I sincerely believe you have a hypocritical double-standard, which you fail to see even when rolled out in front of you.

< Message edited by Lewcifer -- 7/19/2007 10:26:24 AM >


_____________________________

I am fortunate... My wife is also My friend, lover and slave.

(in reply to zindyslave)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Anal hooks - 7/19/2007 10:08:32 AM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lewcifer

It hasn't engendered comments because, typically, people are hypocrites. They'll judge something as unhealthy while engaging in other unhealthy practices themselves.


I doubt many on this board engage in erotic clitoridectomy...

That said, I'll agree that some people frequently misjudge risk, or make value judgments that are odd to me.

quote:


On another note, I commend Y/you for astutely noticing the penetration took place from the vagina, and not into it.


~bow~

Thank you for the compliment.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to Lewcifer)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Anal hooks - 7/19/2007 10:13:05 AM   
Missokyst


Posts: 6041
Joined: 9/9/2006
Status: offline
I tend to agree.  It would not be an acceptable risk for me to take.  And I would question why someone would want to do that to another person.  Particularly a male doing this to a female.  I mean.. is there a similar way to effect both anus and urinal tract in a male?  LOL I would have to know if they had enough knowlege on anatomy to even bring the topic up to me.  And because I know my anatomy well, as well as my health, I would still say HELL NO and here is the door if it came up as something to do for the sake of kink.
Kyst

_____________________________

pain is the breaking of the shell that encloses your understanding ~Gibran, Kahlil

“The truth is, everyone is going to hurt you. You just got to find the ones worth suffering for.”
― Bob Marley


(in reply to Archer)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Anal hooks - 7/19/2007 10:21:17 AM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
Hello, Archer.

Don't think I've commented, but your insight on such topics is something I greatly appreciate.

quote:


The direction of the hook makes some but not all the difference.


I did not claim it makes all the difference, just that it makes a difference.

quote:


The open whle and the next movement of te bowel concerns me as much if not more than the direction of the hooking which if you're going to do it they chose the lesser of the infection potentials, but it still has not gotten anywhere near the level of safety I need for my own ethics to be met.


My ethics are related to informed consent, which involves risk awareness and the capacity to decide.
One can consent to medical experiments, DNR orders, and so forth, after all.
But I would not do this with my nephandi; I perceive the risk as too high.
Which is not to say that I may not find a time, place and person for it.
My preference is for professional level medical care, though.

That aside, a defecant, two rounds, followed by an enema, should limit the initial infection. Adding something like an oral opioid agonist, an NARI, or maybe an oral anticholinergic, will pretty completely halt peristalsis, i.e. no bowel movements. This is probably unhealthy for extended periods of time, and will complicate nutrition during it. But it should significantly simplify the process of healing the wound. Add something like azithromycin, and possibly a topical antiseptic, and I think you're getting to the point where it fits in the regular RACK, although entirely "advanced level". (Pardon the pun.)

That's just a sketch, of course. An idea. The GI tract and infections are not my field.

quote:


The draw back trough issue could be avoided by simply pushhing the hook all the way through since the hook is S shaped.


Excellent advice, including the bit about needles. Thank you. I'll remember that for other things.

quote:


However additional items of concern for me are the fact that the hook appears to be galvanized. Zinc is not an approved of material for hooks used in piercing which are generally stainless steel.


The picture did not seem to be a model of how these things are generally done, if such a word can be applied. Also, note the labia resection and (I think) clitoridectomy, both of which appear done outside a hospital, which is damn risky if done with anything but a cautery tool, as far as I know. Compared to that, and the puncture, galvanizing seems a minor concern in comparison.

quote:


I'll still hold to my thought that nearly professional medical level awareness of infection would be required for ths specific hooking in order to meet RACK standards. Awareness means informed awareness not casual awareness.


~nod~

Though, I'd say an informed awareness of the risks of casual awareness might qualify, YMMV.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to Archer)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Anal hooks - 7/19/2007 10:36:33 AM   
nephandi


Posts: 4470
Joined: 9/23/2005
From: Cold and magickal Norway in a town near Bergen!
Status: offline
Greetings

quote:

The point remains... your characterization of this particular kink as unhealthy, while attempting to characterize bruising (and now, apparently suspension play) as healthy is disingenuous and hypocritical. You clearly stated bruising was not unhealthy, because everyone gets bruised unintentionally. People also get hit by cars unintentionally... that, per-se, does not make it a healthy activity. The fact remains (please feel free to factually refute it) - intentional bruising for the sake of bruising (such as during flogging, caning, spanking, etc) is medically unhealthy.


i do not condem an kink however i will say that the things you say is similar to saying that eating rat posion is the same as eating a chocolathe is the same thing as eating the chocholateto is unhealthy. Or that going outside in winter whitout a scarf is the same as being dropped into ice water as going outside in the cold whiout a scarf to is unhealthy.

There is a scale of unhealthy here. i priced my own ears, sure it would have been more save if i had done it at a piercing studio, but what i riked was a crooked hole and a scar and perhaps a little infection, i am now planing an eyebrow piercing, i will not do this at home as i then risk hitting a nerve and even get an infection in my eye.

When Master whip me on the back i generally in the worst case risk getting a smal cut and that might get lightly infected, but if i make a hole between my vagina and anal i risk having to go to the hospital and have an operation. i am not saying it is wrong for those that want to take that risk, but neither is it hypocrasy to say one will not do this as it is dangerous. For while bruises might not be healthy, this is the same as the chocholate vs rat posion exsample. Neiter is healthy, but one will make you hyper and feeling ill the other might kill you. One need to conider it allot more, and have allot more knowledge to eat rat posion then eating a chocholate.

i wish you well


_____________________________

Whatever you think you can do or believe you can do, begin it. Action has magic, grace and power in it.--Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Futon torpedoes, make love not war!--Aswad


(in reply to Lewcifer)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Anal hooks - 7/19/2007 12:05:19 PM   
bbwslit2use


Posts: 21
Joined: 7/16/2007
Status: offline
Someone can Hook me up!


_____________________________

Dirty Babe..
You see these shackles baby I'm your slave...
I'll let you whip me if I misbehave...
It's just that no one makes me feel this way...


(in reply to nephandi)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Anal hooks - 7/19/2007 12:13:24 PM   
zindyslave


Posts: 601
Joined: 1/14/2007
Status: offline
I am not being a hypocrite I said that people have there kinks, I acknowledge that and I know that most things we do in this lifestyle are not healthy, things that are unhealthy have different levels, something can be unhealthy but still in a way safe, by that I mean it will not require surgery to fix the problem.When I mentioned suspension play and needle play I was saying that they aren't as unhealthy as having a hole between your vagina and rectum. I would much rather be flogged, whipped, whathaveyou than have a hole between my vagina and rectum in which I would have to have surgically fixed. Please feel free to link  some factual information  about how flogging, and spanking can lead to a serious infection. That is what I was talking about...infections are seriously unhealthy. Other than that a persons kink is there kink I don't disparage others because they have a certain kink but when it comes to a serious health problem I will bring that up.

_____________________________

http://www.myspace.com/zindygirl

Only when you see the invisible can you do the impossible.

(in reply to nephandi)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Anal hooks - 7/19/2007 12:14:26 PM   
Lewcifer


Posts: 126
Joined: 5/22/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: nephandi
There is a scale of unhealthy here. i priced my own ears, sure it would have been more save if i had done it at a piercing studio, but what i riked was a crooked hole and a scar and perhaps a little infection, i am now planing an eyebrow piercing, i will not do this at home as i then risk hitting a nerve and even get an infection in my eye.


You miss the point, and instead resort to reductio ad absurdum to avoid addressing my clear and concise statement.

I will not dignify your response with further commentary.

PS - How much did your ears appraise for when you had them priced?
PPS - I once had a girlfriend with a crooked hole, technically.  She had a tipped uterus.


< Message edited by Lewcifer -- 7/19/2007 12:17:01 PM >


_____________________________

I am fortunate... My wife is also My friend, lover and slave.

(in reply to nephandi)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Anal hooks - 7/19/2007 1:08:25 PM   
Lewcifer


Posts: 126
Joined: 5/22/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: zindyslave
...something can be unhealthy but still in a way safe, by that I mean it will not require surgery to fix the problem.


Exactly how do you measure how safe something is according to surgical necessity (or lack thereof)?

I contend it is ludicrous to gauge safety using such a measure.  One can fall ill to many life-threatening woes (not to mention accidents) which do not require surgery, but are nonetheless life-threatening.  Using your standard of measure, such things would be considered "unhealthy but still, in a way, safe."

"When I mentioned suspension play and needle play I was saying that they aren't as unhealthy as having a hole between your vagina and rectum."

No, that is not what you were saying... as evidenced by your original post.  You might be saying that now, but you were not saying it then.

"I would much rather be flogged, whipped, whathaveyou than have a hole between my vagina and rectum in which I would have to have surgically fixed."

Suturing is a part of some peoples' BDSM play.  However, your OP did not deal with personal preference... it clearly decried perineal hooking as an unsafe practice and other BDSM practices (flogging) as safe.  You made no mention of a degree of safety in your post.  Now you're backpedaling.

"Please feel free to link  some factual information  about how flogging, and spanking can lead to a serious infection."


Flagellation Dangers - summary:  blood or lymph infection, blood infection, viral and bacterial infection, HIV, hepatitis and other communicable diseases, scarring, bruises and hematoma, possible life-threatening blood clots, psychological trauma, permanent nerve damage, premanent blood vessel damage, joint problems, spinal problems, kidney damage.

As the sources of information confirming My position are abundant, please google for more.


"That is what I was talking about...infections are seriously unhealthy."

It is not what you were talking about - read your original post.  It may be what you have turned this into now, but do not continue to be blatantly disingenuous by stating it is "what you were talking about."

< Message edited by Lewcifer -- 7/19/2007 1:12:12 PM >


_____________________________

I am fortunate... My wife is also My friend, lover and slave.

(in reply to zindyslave)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Anal hooks - 7/19/2007 1:08:31 PM   
nephandi


Posts: 4470
Joined: 9/23/2005
From: Cold and magickal Norway in a town near Bergen!
Status: offline
Hi

i never said you was a hipocrite. i made a comment to Lewcifer that while flogging can pose the risk of getting a small infection, putting a hook in the wall between your vagina and your anus can land you in a hospital so i think that while it is ok if pepole really want to do it, allot more care and consideration is needed to do that than to flog somone. i agree whit you, and if you belive i have said you are a hipocrite then i apologize, you have misunderstood me.

i wish you well


_____________________________

Whatever you think you can do or believe you can do, begin it. Action has magic, grace and power in it.--Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Futon torpedoes, make love not war!--Aswad


(in reply to zindyslave)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Anal hooks - 7/19/2007 1:11:05 PM   
nephandi


Posts: 4470
Joined: 9/23/2005
From: Cold and magickal Norway in a town near Bergen!
Status: offline
Hi

i have adressed your statement but you seam unable to read or understand words that do not agree whit your opinion. While i do not have a wikipedia link to decribe the condition of such an selective blindess, i am sure it exist.

i wish you well


_____________________________

Whatever you think you can do or believe you can do, begin it. Action has magic, grace and power in it.--Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Futon torpedoes, make love not war!--Aswad


(in reply to Lewcifer)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Anal hooks - 7/19/2007 1:11:42 PM   
Lewcifer


Posts: 126
Joined: 5/22/2007
Status: offline
-- This space intentionally left blank --

< Message edited by nephandi -- 7/19/2007 1:17:01 PM >

< Message edited by zindyslave -- 7/19/2007 1:17:07 PM >


< Message edited by Lewcifer -- 7/19/2007 1:17:18 PM >

(in reply to Lewcifer)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Anal hooks - 7/19/2007 1:30:52 PM   
nyrisa


Posts: 1830
Joined: 11/20/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: nephandi

Greetings

quote:

The point remains... your characterization of this particular kink as unhealthy, while attempting to characterize bruising (and now, apparently suspension play) as healthy is disingenuous and hypocritical. You clearly stated bruising was not unhealthy, because everyone gets bruised unintentionally. People also get hit by cars unintentionally... that, per-se, does not make it a healthy activity. The fact remains (please feel free to factually refute it) - intentional bruising for the sake of bruising (such as during flogging, caning, spanking, etc) is medically unhealthy.




i do not condem an kink however i will say that the things you say is similar to saying that eating rat posion is the same as eating a chocolathe is the same thing as eating the chocholateto is unhealthy. Or that going outside in winter whitout a scarf is the same as being dropped into ice water as going outside in the cold whiout a scarf to is unhealthy.

There is a scale of unhealthy here. i priced my own ears, sure it would have been more save if i had done it at a piercing studio, but what i riked was a crooked hole and a scar and perhaps a little infection, i am now planing an eyebrow piercing, i will not do this at home as i then risk hitting a nerve and even get an infection in my eye.

When Master whip me on the back i generally in the worst case risk getting a smal cut and that might get lightly infected, but if i make a hole between my vagina and anal i risk having to go to the hospital and have an operation. i am not saying it is wrong for those that want to take that risk, but neither is it hypocrasy to say one will not do this as it is dangerous. For while bruises might not be healthy, this is the same as the chocholate vs rat posion exsample. Neiter is healthy, but one will make you hyper and feeling ill the other might kill you. One need to conider it allot more, and have allot more knowledge to eat rat posion then eating a chocholate.

i wish you well

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lewcifer

quote:

ORIGINAL: nephandi
There is a scale of unhealthy here. i priced my own ears, sure it would have been more save if i had done it at a piercing studio, but what i riked was a crooked hole and a scar and perhaps a little infection, i am now planing an eyebrow piercing, i will not do this at home as i then risk hitting a nerve and even get an infection in my eye.


You miss the point, and instead resort to reductio ad absurdum to avoid addressing my clear and concise statement.

I will not dignify your response with further commentary.

PS - How much did your ears appraise for when you had them priced?
PPS - I once had a girlfriend with a crooked hole, technically.  She had a tipped uterus.






I'd like to hear your reply to her post, actually. And without resorting to cheap shots involving typos, which don't affect the validity of the thoughts expressed. To take refuge in saying her post is not worthy of reply seems a little small.

< Message edited by nyrisa -- 7/19/2007 1:33:58 PM >


_____________________________

A true lady takes off her dignity with her clothes and does her whorish best. At other times you can be as modest and dignified as your persona requires. Robert Heinlein

The last thing I want to do is hurt you...but it is still on my list.

(in reply to nephandi)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Anal hooks - 7/19/2007 1:40:51 PM   
domiguy


Posts: 12952
Joined: 5/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lewcifer

quote:

ORIGINAL: zindyslave
I have no problems with someone using hooks in suspension play it is the simple fact that a woman most likely will get a serious infection from having an open path from the vagina and rectum. I know that most kinks in the lifestyle are medically unacceptable but the fact of the matter is, most would not do something similar to the picture. Esspecially if they had known people that had went through an infection that is caused by feces in the vagina. I am not disparaging anyone for their kink I was just stating that it isn' t healthy, some people might not have known that...that is why I mentioned it. Everyone is entitled to there kinks but as these boards sometimes help people learn then I think it is best to point out the problems that can arise from said activity so they can be aware of the risks involved.


The point remains... your characterization of this particular kink as unhealthy, while attempting to characterize bruising (and now, apparently suspension play) as healthy is disingenuous and hypocritical.  You clearly stated bruising was not unhealthy, because everyone gets bruised unintentionally.  People also get hit by cars unintentionally... that, per-se, does not make it a healthy activity.  The fact remains (please feel free to factually refute it) - intentional bruising for the sake of bruising (such as during flogging, caning, spanking, etc) is medically unhealthy.

That being said, you object to fissure hooking because if done wrong it can lead to possible vaginal infection.  Yet you condone needle play and body hook suspension.  Using your same arguments - needle play, if done wrong, can lead to a build-up of scar tissue or worse if blood vessels are pierced.  Likewise, body hook suspension carries the same risks, along with the possibility of tearing and associated infection.

You further attempt to justify your statement by saying that some people on this board might not realize fissure hooking isn't healthy.  Yet you make no attempt to notify them of the unhealthy effects of flogging, spanking, or other activites you seem to partake in... I've even searched your previous posts.  Your recent comments lead me to believe you are convinced these activities are healthy.  Nothing can be further from the truth, and self-denial is no substitute for risk awareness.

I sincerely believe you have a hypocritical double-standard, which you fail to see even when rolled out in front of you.


First off I have never seen what you posted as described as an anal hook.....It looks more like someone who is preparing to go fishing for Great White Sharks.

So you post something that is actually not very germane to the conversation and then you get pissed when it is not graciously received.

It simply shows a lack of judgment on your part.

< Message edited by domiguy -- 7/19/2007 1:41:37 PM >


_____________________________



(in reply to Lewcifer)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Anal hooks - 7/19/2007 1:52:13 PM   
zindyslave


Posts: 601
Joined: 1/14/2007
Status: offline
nephandi, I wasn't replying to you, I used fast reply and I am sorry for the misunderstanding that may have caused. I agree with what you said in that post. He for one isn't listening to what I am saying or I am not saying it clearly enough. 

_____________________________

http://www.myspace.com/zindygirl

Only when you see the invisible can you do the impossible.

(in reply to domiguy)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Anal hooks - 7/19/2007 1:55:11 PM   
nephandi


Posts: 4470
Joined: 9/23/2005
From: Cold and magickal Norway in a town near Bergen!
Status: offline
Hi

Ah ok, forgive me for the misunderstanding then, i just belived you was replying to me.

i wish you well


_____________________________

Whatever you think you can do or believe you can do, begin it. Action has magic, grace and power in it.--Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Futon torpedoes, make love not war!--Aswad


(in reply to zindyslave)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Anal hooks - 7/19/2007 2:11:14 PM   
Lewcifer


Posts: 126
Joined: 5/22/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: domiguy
First off I have never seen what you posted as described as an anal hook.....It looks more like someone who is preparing to go fishing for Great White Sharks.


Likewise, I haven't seen humans that were anally/vaginally baited through hooks used for shark fishing.

"So you post something that is actually not very germane to the conversation and then you get pissed when it is not graciously received."

How is your post describing perineum hooking as "shark fishing" germane to the conversation?

Upon what factual basis did you erroneously conclude I was pissed?

"It simply shows a lack of judgment on your part."

In which regard, and in what respect?


< Message edited by Lewcifer -- 7/19/2007 2:17:29 PM >


_____________________________

I am fortunate... My wife is also My friend, lover and slave.

(in reply to domiguy)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Anal hooks - 7/19/2007 2:13:50 PM   
Lewcifer


Posts: 126
Joined: 5/22/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: nyrisa
I'd like to hear your reply to her post, actually. And without resorting to cheap shots involving typos, which don't affect the validity of the thoughts expressed. To take refuge in saying her post is not worthy of reply seems a little small.


One thing at a time.  I'd be happy to address her post, after she replies to My original issues which she quoted.

If her response consists of reductio ad absurdum, I see no point in responding.  Talking about rat poison vs eating chocolate, and winter without a scarf vs being submerged in ice water, and equating them to the elements already set forth regarding kink amounts to reductio ad absurdum.  You'll note that my posts were not referring to a degree of "unhealthy" - only the fact that zindyslave had originally claimed flogging to be healthy.  The degree of "healthy" or "safety" was not an issue here, and thus there is no point in My responding to an allegation I did not make!


< Message edited by Lewcifer -- 7/19/2007 2:27:21 PM >


_____________________________

I am fortunate... My wife is also My friend, lover and slave.

(in reply to nyrisa)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Bondage Gear and Apparel >> RE: Anal hooks Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.066