Darkhaven80 -> RE: .why. (8/6/2007 10:09:52 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: AquaticSub quote:
ORIGINAL: Darkhaven80 quote:
ORIGINAL: Darcyandthedark Why do people believe that more years = more knowledge?[&:] The reasoning there seems pretty logical to me. The problem is that time spent in the lifestyle does not mean a person spent all that time actively learning. A person can paint for 20 years and still be a crappy painter if they never bothered to learn anything. Yes, that's also common sense. I'm not including players and non-active lifestylers since that's not what he wrote. I'm just going with his simply stated sentence. If a person is in the lifestyle for a longer period of time (actually in there, not pretending to be), then they will have acquired more knowledge. They would have seen more, spoken to more people in the lifestyle, and likely have tried more personally. There is no given rule with it but clearly I can see why people would assume it. A person in one profession or hobby would have gained more knowledge than a newbie in it. Don't take me wrong - if you're a dominant that's a natural then you don't need the years to make you a great dominant, because you already are one. I know there's plenty who have been out there for awhile and most subs here wouldn't give them the time of day long.
|
|
|
|