|
Aswad -> RE: Difference between male and female dominance (8/25/2007 1:59:46 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: cloudboy
As the world is though, men don't do what Aakasha does, either as professionals or as married carreerists with a paid hobby on the side. There's no market for it.
Or, perhaps, it's just a fairly closed market.
In any case, my guess is that most men are more experience-centric (i.e. primarily want to experience things, do stuff, etc., whether they call themselves bottoms or subs), while most women are more relationship-centric (i.e. want the connection) in this regard. That may not be a correct guess, but it generally fits with what I see among vanillas too.
That also goes well with how it appears that men are more likely to engage in, as one poster called it, "off the wall kinks", and can focus immensely on these, often to the point where they are simply unattractive to the majority of potentially compatible women out there, while women with kinks appear to be a bit more well-rounded.
Male prostitutes catering to women in Norway have to go through quite a few hoops to establish themselves, and it's a rather different ballgame (no pun intended) than what the female prostitutes see. Male clients are frequently happy if they just get something vaguely resembling the hole/kink of their choice. Female clients want discretion, class, interaction and mental stimulation. Those who cater to them are booked into their next lives, because so few are "up to spec". Which kind of comes back to most women having more patience, less aggressive libidos, and a more easily triggered "turn-off" response, i.e. if it's not good enough, it's not worth having. Most men seem to be willing to compromise way below their preferences just to get off.
Again, just generalizing from guesswork here, I'm not saying this is categorically so.
I'd like to replace the guesswork with some empirics, but haven't found much.
|
|
|
|
