Aswad
Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Bobkgin But the theme is there: being free from the Moral Majority (BDSM Chapter) is a key right many of us insist upon. All of us, in fact. Thing is, some of us insist of being free of the Moral Minority as well. quote:
I keep hearing the same Vanilla arguments from the other side: "oh a woman cannot consent to being tied up and whipped unless she is legally incompetent", etc. And on this side, she can't even consent to being spanked if legally incompetent. On the other hand, people think it's quite fine to incarcerate someone who was incompetent when they did a crime, under the argument that it was a choice on their part. Many have voiced the opinion that prop's daddy should be incarcerated for what she sees as saving her, thus putting her back in an institution, where (depending on local legislation) people who don't know her can e.g. run 0.9 Amps through her brain without consent. From my angle, that's not "saving" ... that's rape, plain and simple. A bit of perspective would be nice, at times. quote:
Does my heart good to see so many defending their right to consent. Well, my latest checkup indicates the experimental treatment has worked: it's doing so well right now, that it's virtually impossible to do it any further good at this point. (Pardon my lame attempt at ante coffeam humor.) Very much agree with the sentiment, though. Most are just in it for the kink, and the rest follows from that. Some are into having a choice, and the kink follows from that, instead. That and a compatible worldview is why I headed toward the other side of the lifestyles: sovereignty and autonomy are key. Without these things, BDSM is just vanilla with a kink or two (or 666). Health, al-Aswad.
_____________________________
"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind. From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way. We do." -- Rorschack, Watchmen.
|