SixFootMaster
Posts: 829
Joined: 9/27/2007
Status: offline
|
Quite simply, psychology is largely theoretical nature - embodying various concepts and disciplines that have no formal and tangible existence. They are abstractions, methods by which we can quantify that which would otherwise be unquantifiable. How do you assess the degree of passivity or assertiveness of an individual except by some preconceived reference point. These studies are largely nebulous in nature because they have to be, if you desire hard concrete facts, then psychology is not for you.
I can however give you these facts, and allow you to digest them how you will:
1. The traits of the slave are different from those of the submissive
2. Women - and men, universally, contain in their make up traits of one, both, or neither
3. Women and men who contain neither may further contain the traits of the dominant and/or the master, these are not the topic of this discussion
4. Women for whom the slave traits are dominant in their psychology, identify as slave
5. Women for whom the submissive traits are dominant in their psychology, identify as submissive
6. In all populations of a sufficient size the distribution of psychological traits when normalized fits a statistical bell curve
7. We call this distribution a figurative "spectrum" since it accurately describes the variance between one extreme to the other.
8. There are, as noted, women who occupy these extremes and possess fully only the psychological traits of either the slave or the submissive
In general, it not possible to know exactly where in this spectrum a given individual lays, but we can accurately make these further statements.
1. A woman who lays in the 50% to the slave side of the median, is more slave than submissive, and will respond and enjoy those interactions to a greater extent than those of a submissive
2. A woman who lays in the 50% to the submissive side of the median, is more submissive than slave, and will respond and enjoy those interactions to a greater extent than those of a slave
3. A woman who lays exactly on the extreme of the slave side is a true slave, and is incapable of enjoying or being fulfilled by submissive interactions
4. A woman who lays exactly on the extreme of the submissive side is a true submissive, and is incapable of enjoying or being fullfilled by slave interactions
5. A woman who occupies the median point, and is an equal balance of slave and submissive is equally fullfilled and enjoys both.
Now, I'll add some general points:
1. Treating a submissive like a slave will damage her, attempting to break her like a slave will destroy her
2. Even a woman who is significantly or nearly completely slave, will be harmed by an attempt to fully break her
|
RE: Breaking a sub/slave? - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread