Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Dominants Using Titles


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> Dominants Using Titles Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Dominants Using Titles - 12/7/2007 2:21:38 PM   
Stephann


Posts: 4214
Joined: 12/27/2006
From: Portland, OR
Status: offline
Growing up, my mom made it very clear to me that I should use Mister, Misses, or Miss for adults.  As an adult, I do my best to make use of titles, respectfully, when they are due.  I've had several interviews where an important person was introduced to me as "John" or "Mike" or "Dave" yet I persisted on using Mr Smith/Jones/Daniels, simply because I didn't feel there was a casual enough of a relationship to warrent a first name basis.

Yet, in the BDSM world (especially in an online format) I have a difficult time using titles of any sort, unless I absolutely feel they're warrented.

People who post as Master/Mistress, for me, I feel it's fine that they use that title for themselves.  But in speaking directly to them, I'm completely uncomfortable addressing them as Master John or Mistress Jane.  I feel while their title may have been earned in their circle, and they very well may be worthy of the title, I feel the implication is that I'm expected to defer to their status in some fashion.  Am I out of my gourd?

I'm certainly not above giving respect to those who have earned it.  I'm also completely comfortable with folks referring to me as Sir in correspondence (or even Master, from the odd slave who identifies as a kajira), should they feel it's warrented.  I expect both my slave and submissive to refer to me as Master and Sir, respectively, and I require my slave to refer to others in the lifestyle as Sir, Ma'am, or Miss unless otherwise instructed by the dominant in question.

Here's the real question; those who identify as dominants, and affix 'Master/Mistress/Miss" to your names, do you feel slighted when another dominant chooses not to address you as such?  For the s-types, do you feel compelled to use a stated titled?

Stephan


< Message edited by Stephann -- 12/7/2007 2:24:50 PM >


_____________________________

Nosce Te Ipsum

"The blade itself incites to violence" - Homer

Men: Find a Woman here
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Dominants Using Titles - 12/7/2007 2:25:15 PM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
I have it so very easy, I take my cue from Daddy as to what to call people in the lifestyle and I do not have to weigh out whether they deserve it or not.

If left up to me, no one would deserve it but the person I am submitting to...

In vanilla settings, I use people's first names most of the time, but in California we are rather casual about such things. Even most of my professors hated being called "Dr." or "professor"

_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to Stephann)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Dominants Using Titles - 12/7/2007 2:26:09 PM   
MasterFireMaam


Posts: 5587
Joined: 3/1/2006
From: Charleston, WV
Status: offline
Go with what makes you comfortable. That's what you do in your vanilla setting, so do it here, too. If their feathers get ruffled by it, that's about THEIR stuff, not yours.

Master Fire


_____________________________

The power of who we are can be intoxicating. The power of who we could be is humbling.
-----
Ms Relationship Books
-----
BDSM How-To Books

(in reply to Stephann)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Dominants Using Titles - 12/7/2007 2:28:29 PM   
Stephann


Posts: 4214
Joined: 12/27/2006
From: Portland, OR
Status: offline
M Fire,

Thank you for your input.  To be honest, it's your title that made me think on it.  I remember when you first started posting, and people seemed to be a little surprised by a woman using the title Master.  I've had nothing but the utmost respect for your opinions, but calling someone else Master or Mistress online just squicks the hell out of me.  I've never had to do it in person, so I suppose that's part of the reason.

Warm regards,

Stephan


_____________________________

Nosce Te Ipsum

"The blade itself incites to violence" - Homer

Men: Find a Woman here

(in reply to MasterFireMaam)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Dominants Using Titles - 12/7/2007 2:30:14 PM   
ctrlaltdelete


Posts: 284
Joined: 11/6/2007
Status: offline
I realize this was not addressed to me as the intended audience - yet I can very much identify with your out-of-gourd experience.

To me, it is very reminiscent of the military. If you affix Sir/Lord/Master/Mistress to your name, it is like seeing an epaulette with the insignia attached. While those insignia indicate a certain rank to me, they do not immediately tell  me that the authority and respect that are attached to that rank have actually been earned.

But if you omit the rank in addressing said individual, feelers get hurt (and usually asses get chewed, too). I whole-heartedly second that question - how do you feel if 1) someone of "lower rank" and 2) someone of "equal or higher rank" fails to address you by your title?

_____________________________

The opinions expressed in my posts are strictly mine and do not seek to imply that my personal beliefs are representative of those of ANY other individual(s). Should these opinions hurt your little feelers, you are free and welcome to stop reading them.

(in reply to Stephann)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Dominants Using Titles - 12/7/2007 2:31:09 PM   
LadyHibiscus


Posts: 27124
Joined: 8/15/2005
From: Island Of Misfit Toys
Status: offline
I introduce myself as "Francine", and I neither use nor expect titles from anyone.  I do use "Mistress" or some such online to indicate my gender and orientation, but beyond that, if I am not in a personal relationship with that person, they are certainly not obligated to use a title.  I offer them the same courtesy. :)

_____________________________

[page 23 girl]



(in reply to Stephann)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Dominants Using Titles - 12/7/2007 2:32:41 PM   
laurell3


Posts: 6577
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
I don't even like it in vanilla life when someone refers to me by a title.  I don't use titles with people I don't know and find people that insist on it with those that are not submissive to them ridiculous.  For me it has nothing to do with merit, but with the fact that using a title, to me denotes something significant about that person for me.  However, when I first got involved in the lifestyle, online those that were s types were rebuffed for not using titles with D types, now the opposite seems to be true.

I do think it's common for people that grew up in certain regions to us general titles even in vanilla life and changing to not doing that in the nonvanilla areas of their lives may be difficult.

< Message edited by laurell3 -- 12/7/2007 3:00:21 PM >


_____________________________

I cannot be defined by moments in my life, but must be considered for by the entirety of my existence.

When you fail to consider that I am the best judge for what is right for me, all of your opinions become suspect to me.

(in reply to Stephann)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Dominants Using Titles - 12/7/2007 2:32:47 PM   
Raechard


Posts: 3513
Joined: 3/10/2007
From: S.E. London U.K.
Status: offline
I’ve been called Sir and I don’t know why they do it. I think some like to call me Sir because it makes them feel submissive to me but I honestly can’t stand it because I’m a person and it feels so impersonal. Unless the person is a lot older than me, then it is a bit kinky and funny at the same time so I love it. I don’t like to call people by their own names either even those I have known for years. I prefer Mr, Mrs, in real life but online is another matter. I’m not sure why that is but it’s a bit stuffy if you are calling people by titles all the time I suppose.

 
Teachers these days liked to be called by their first names. I find that concept strange I think it has to do with teachers controlling passively by engendering some kind of friendship with the student. I’m not sure who would really fall for any of that because the only teachers I ever respected were the ones that opened my eyes to a subject.

edit: full = fall

< Message edited by Raechard -- 12/7/2007 2:34:40 PM >


_____________________________

えへまにんへえや
Nobody wants to listen to the same song over and over again!

(in reply to Stephann)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Dominants Using Titles - 12/7/2007 2:35:07 PM   
toservez


Posts: 1733
Joined: 9/7/2006
From: All over now in Minnesota
Status: offline
I have a similar background. Parents of friends always trying to get me to call them by their first names and when I first started out in my career I got talked to by higher ups about trying to fit in more by not being so formal.

I have completely the opposite reaction when I was involved in local communities. I simply refused or tried not to smirk when a person who was not my own owners wanted to be called words of that nature.

Respect and humility are huge things in my life/culture and found for me personally it was a bad mixture of both those philosophies I tangibly have lived in my life and to put is simply got totally bastardized by how some in local communities wanted to use them. I did not blame them but I could not play along.


_____________________________

I am sorry I do not fit Webster's defintion of a slave but thankfully my Master is not Webster.

"Anything that contradicts experience and logic should be abandoned." - H.H. The 14th Dalai Lama

(in reply to Stephann)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Dominants Using Titles - 12/7/2007 2:38:04 PM   
Sabella


Posts: 265
Joined: 7/26/2005
Status: offline
<---s-type here :)

I feel no compulsion to use any title that someone has given themselves. It's a problem sometimes (as I've posted before) when I get a PM from LordGodMaster because then I have nothing to call them other than "hey you!"

Also I'm aware of the "I may be a Master, but I'm not YOUR master" and I respect that to the utmost degree, and likewise am aware of their unspoken respect as well by not introducing themselves as such. Ironically the folks who tend to follow that train of thought are NOT the folks who have Lord/God/Master/Dom in their user names.

I admit tho there are a number of people here I would be hard pressed not to involuntarily address as "Master" should we ever meet, because of the respect I have for them. So far it hasn't been a problem ;)

EDIT: I am a southern girl so I frequently use Ma'am and Sir with folks older than me, It's impossible to do otherwise *eyes grandmother*


< Message edited by Sabella -- 12/7/2007 2:39:29 PM >


_____________________________

“The giant Grof was hit in one eye by a stone,
and that eye turned inward so that it looked into his mind and he died of what he saw there.”
From The Forgotten Beasts of Eld, by Patricia A. McKillip

(in reply to ctrlaltdelete)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Dominants Using Titles - 12/7/2007 2:40:08 PM   
DarkDaddyZ


Posts: 805
Joined: 4/7/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Stephann

Growing up, my mom made it very clear to me that I should use Mister, Misses, or Miss for adults.  As an adult, I do my best to make use of titles, respectfully, when they are due.  I've had several interviews where an important person was introduced to me as "John" or "Mike" or "Dave" yet I persisted on using Mr Smith/Jones/Daniels, simply because I didn't feel there was a casual enough of a relationship to warrent a first name basis.

Yet, in the BDSM world (especially in an online format) I have a difficult time using titles of any sort, unless I absolutely feel they're warrented.

People who post as Master/Mistress, for me, I feel it's fine that they use that title for themselves.  But in speaking directly to them, I'm completely uncomfortable addressing them as Master John or Mistress Jane.  I feel while their title may have been earned in their circle, and they very well may be worthy of the title, I feel the implication is that I'm expected to defer to their status in some fashion.  Am I out of my gourd?

I'm certainly not above giving respect to those who have earned it.  I'm also completely comfortable with folks referring to me as Sir in correspondence (or even Master, from the odd slave who identifies as a kajira), should they feel it's warrented.  I expect both my slave and submissive to refer to me as Master and Sir, respectively, and I require my slave to refer to others in the lifestyle as Sir, Ma'am, or Miss unless otherwise instructed by the dominant in question.

Here's the real question; those who identify as dominants, and affix 'Master/Mistress/Miss" to your names, do you feel slighted when another dominant chooses not to address you as such?  For the s-types, do you feel compelled to use a stated titled?

Stephan


I don't require anyone to use a title to me except those that I am in a power exchange relationship.  When I respect someone, I do use their title when addressing them.

Z-

_____________________________

"Flirting is part of the job description." DJ Jesus (Lucy Daughter Of The Devil)

Vanilla Official Music Page http://www.myspace.com/djzulu

(in reply to Stephann)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Dominants Using Titles - 12/7/2007 2:40:26 PM   
Jeffff


Posts: 12600
Joined: 7/7/2007
Status: offline
This doesn't really apply to me. Out side of a close personal relationship I am Jeff. Even in the relationship I prefer Jeff most of the time. I have a hard time calling someone Master or Mistress or Lord.  TO me that is a title to be used by their sub/slave.

Jeff

(in reply to Raechard)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Dominants Using Titles - 12/7/2007 3:04:31 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
Stephann, in My view, you're right on the mark.  I have very similar opinions on the subject.

When online, the best I have to go by is a screen name.  I have no problem with addressing someone as they have addressed themselves by their chosen moniker.  That applies whether there is a title included in it or not.  If I talk to someone specifically, I'll call them whatever they chose to call themselves.  I tend not to add or detract from that.  Just like I say "Stephann" when addressing you, I have no issue with, for example, saying "MasterFireMa'am" when talking to her.

What I won't do, however, is change that to a different status.  While I have no doubt of either being who they are, I wouldn't, for example, go back and call you "Sir".  This has nothing to do with you personally.  I happen to have quite a bit of respect for the things you say and the way you present yourself.  Same with MasterFireMaam.  I neither call her Master, or Maam, because she is neither to Me.

Meatlife, to Me, is a bit different.  There are certain folks r/t who have struck such a place with Me that I will give them the honorary "Sir" or "Ma'am" once in a while.  I have no problem in using these terms for vanilla folks, but lifestyle folks are different. 


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to Jeffff)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Dominants Using Titles - 12/7/2007 3:38:27 PM   
ItalianSMistress


Posts: 427
Joined: 1/19/2007
From: Niagara Region Ontario Canada
Status: offline
There was a question about Domme vs Mistress the other day, and I think I have pretty much the same answer I gave there.  Only My collared slaves are permitted to call Me Mistress, and once they do, they are not to call anyone else that (or Master, of course).  A slave that I am only training but have not collared, or one that I am screening will call Me mostly Ma'am,,,,sometimes Governess.  I am not their Mistress unless they belong to Me, so I only like that title in such cases.  I never have a slave call Me by My name, in fact, most that I speak to, dont even know it.  I have had collared slaves for years that have never said My name, ever.  I make it very clear in My profile that I will not even respond to someone that calls Me Mistress in their message.  As far as other Dom/mes go, I dont expect them to address Me as Ma'am, however some will call Me Governess, but as long as they show a common respect, as I would for them, I dont care what they call Me. 

_____________________________

Governess

"Dominance is the ability to create a hunger in someone that's so strong they will do anything, anytime, anywhere just to please you."


http://italianmistress.livejournal.com/


(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Dominants Using Titles - 12/7/2007 3:43:55 PM   
TreasureKY


Posts: 3032
Joined: 4/10/2007
From: Kentucky
Status: offline
I don't feel the least bit compelled to refer to any dominant types with a title.  I've mentioned before that I even have difficulty casually referring to FirmhandKY as "sir", though it isn't because he has not earned that respect... it's because I equate that title to emotional distance.

I have absolutely no problem using "Sir" or "Ma'am" with strangers or with superiors in my work environment, though admittedly it's typically only in a "can I help you, Sir?" fashion or "yes, Ma'am" in answer to a question.  But in those cases, it isn't really respect or deference that I'm showing... it's just... politeness or exaggerated obsequiousness.

My own personal idiosyncrasies aside, your being uncomfortable is certainly understandable.

quote:

ORIGINAL: toservez

...  when I first started out in my career I got talked to by higher ups about trying to fit in more by not being so formal.


I had a similar experience... in the first job after I left the military, it took my boss six months to break me of calling her "Mrs. Wilson".


(in reply to Stephann)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Dominants Using Titles - 12/7/2007 3:46:33 PM   
littlehumbledone


Posts: 72
Joined: 10/2/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Stephann


Here's the real question; those who identify as dominants, and affix 'Master/Mistress/Miss" to your names, do you feel slighted when another dominant chooses not to address you as such?  For the s-types, do you feel compelled to use a stated titled?

Stephan



Usually no, while I am polite, the only person who gets called Sir or Master will be my actual Sir or Master, anyone else, dom/domme gets called by whatever name comes after the Sir/Master/Mistress bit.

But then again, I am often accused of not being a 'real' (whatever that is) sub.



_____________________________

...
I don't need anyone to blow out another woman's candle to make mine burn brighter.

(in reply to Stephann)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Dominants Using Titles - 12/7/2007 3:49:12 PM   
pinksugarsub


Posts: 1224
Status: offline
Much ado about nothing.  Frankly, telling me to call You "Sir" or some such thing is out of line.
 
pinksugarsub

_____________________________





(in reply to ItalianSMistress)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Dominants Using Titles - 12/7/2007 3:56:39 PM   
chiaThePet


Posts: 2694
Joined: 2/4/2007
Status: offline
Hell, I'd be happy just to call you.

Yada Yada.

chia* (the pet)  And no, pet isn't necessary, chia* is just fine.

_____________________________

Love is a many splendid sting.

You can stick me in the corner, but I'll probably just end up coloring on the walls.

(in reply to Stephann)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Dominants Using Titles - 12/7/2007 4:03:00 PM   
laurell3


Posts: 6577
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
it's Mr. pet/plant thing chia then?

_____________________________

I cannot be defined by moments in my life, but must be considered for by the entirety of my existence.

When you fail to consider that I am the best judge for what is right for me, all of your opinions become suspect to me.

(in reply to chiaThePet)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Dominants Using Titles - 12/7/2007 4:03:35 PM   
ravennfyre


Posts: 161
Joined: 6/23/2007
Status: offline
i was raised much the same way. even though i'm 41, i will still call the neighbor from my childhood "Mr So and So". In daily living, men are Sir, women are Ma'am. Always.

If i know them on a more personal, casual level, the older gentlemen would be called something like "Young Man" and the women "Missy" or "LadyJane" Never said disrespectfully, and only after i've gotten to know them better...get a sense of their humor level...

(in reply to Stephann)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> Dominants Using Titles Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109