Termyn8or
Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005 Status: offline
|
Interestingly "Administrative Announcements", a category that seems to be largely left alone, has a new post in it. By none other than the ever diligent Moderator Eleven, and I do not mean that sarcastically. You might want to smack the mouse around and read it, but suffice it to say she asserts that she is seeing hijacks as a way some posters are using to deliberately derail or demean ideas with which they do not agree or "think are stupid". Recently I was talking to someone about a pro se defense in court, none of the tin hat mumbo jumbo, but people do actually do it without being radical. What I said went back to the tenet of law that without intent there is no crime. I told them a statement that could be used "If you break someone's leg, it's not good, but if you break someone's leg on purpose, that is a crime". So for one, most people probably do not read that category so I thought I would mention it here, because actually if a capitol if hijacks were ever defined, it would be Off Topic. Secondly, you can't respond there. I thought I'd throw it out here and let people chew it up. I know I have hijacked, but my intention is not to derail because I disagree, if I disagree I will state my case, if I think a thread's subject is stupid (IMOO) I will not respond at all. Now that is not to say that I think every thread to which I do not respond is stupid, don't read between the lines, just read the lines. When I do what I would consider a hijack, it is a tertiary issue that is related somehow. But then is it a hijack ? I think it would be a good idea to define just what a hijack is. There are some things I believe it is not. In the thread about zoloft withdrawal I expounded on depression. Well that is pertinent. I think. My ideas on psychology are as radical as my political views, but they have helped me and others to be more well adjusted to this FUBARed world in which we live. I believe that you learn and grow out of such problems, rather than numb yourself by becoming a trustee of modern chemistry. But that is not the point of this post. So as you can see, right there I almost hijacked myself. Or did I ? So I don't think this is going to be so easily defined. Are there going to be acceptable and unacceptable hijacks ? A line must be drawn somewhere. I have seen replies in the tone of "This from someone who thinks ______". That can get annoying, especially with the quoting. If I said the sky is green, I said nothing about the color of grass. Is that a hijack ? You can't really have an in depth discussion about near any subject without some tertiary issues being brought up. For example if I started in about foreign cars and someone mentions all the scrap metal being shipped overseas, I don't think I could really call that a hijack. And to mention all the other products that are imported instead of made here would be related as well. So what constitutes a hijack then ? What if someone says that Hillary would fix it ? Mod 11 impresses me. Really. She must read just about every post coming in, and this is a busy site. It took her a matter of hours to kill that dog licking thread, to which I was going to respond. My first words were going to be something like "I can't believe they let you post this here". Five people IIRC had replied, I would have been the sixth, but when I hit send it did not work, it was gone. She is very diligent and dedicated, but now to take on the task of sorting through "hijacks" ?. I hope they pay her well. And that's not all. I got a guy's real email and have corresponded. He is no longer on this site and says that Mod11 is biased against his political views. I do not agree, even though I agree with some of those views. But that is human nature. He might say he can agree to disagree, but he can't quite do it. Anyway, dealing with hijacks is going to be a big job. It is going to boil down to not only content, but now also the intent of the content. At least that is the way I see it. I wouldn't want the job. Go look yourself, but the thing is there you can't reply. Administrative Announcements, it's easy to find, it is the only post from 2008. So I thought a bit of caucus on the subject might be good. T
|