hairy submissives and slaves (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress



Message


LadyMarmalade1 -> hairy submissives and slaves (3/16/2008 11:30:33 AM)

hi, I have a curious question that was recently brought up by my male slave, and I thought it was a good question.  he asked me if there are any Mistresses who like their slaves hairy.  I'm always reading about slaves who claim to be hairless and the Dommes who want them that way, but myself, I like my slave with his hairy chest, etc (even when he is crossdressing).
Are there others like me? :)
And does any one have any ideas about why subs are generally expected to be hairless? or is it just personal preferance? (we both have ideas about this but I'm curious what others say)

Thanks for your ideas,
Lady Marmalade




Cherish1102 -> RE: hairy submissives and slaves (3/16/2008 12:03:28 PM)

Hello,
Though I'm admittedly new to bdsm in general, I do have a few things to say on this topic. When you think about it, the steriotypical sexy, young pool boy or whatever is hairless. It's easy to picture the sleek muscles and shine of his skin, and it's a nice look, even if you aren't particularly attracted to that sort of thing. I think personally that it's people just expecting that look, so they make their subs fit it. It could also be a sign of submission in more ways than that. Think of prison and military haircuts. In prison, taking the prisoners hair is seen as a way to break them (at least, it used to be).
I used to like the hairless look. But my sub is a forest of thick black hair, and I quite enjoy it. 'The Furry.' It's fun. [:D] 
So yes, there are others out there like you. Teehee.
~Cherish~




LadyHathor -> RE: hairy submissives and slaves (3/16/2008 12:04:14 PM)

chest yes, legs ok, back NO, balls and anus, NO




MzStripes -> RE: hairy submissives and slaves (3/16/2008 12:07:04 PM)

It would depend on how hairy! I do like a male with a hairy chest...nice pulling spot too! Of course, I require the genitals and anus to be shaved clean. I've even brought out tweezers when it wasn't done properly. After one session of my plucking them clean they tend to learn to do it right themselves...lol




MsLadySue -> RE: hairy submissives and slaves (3/16/2008 12:27:12 PM)

The way I've been led to understand the hairless aspect is for humiliation. It supposedly takes away their manliness.

My preference is for a boy with body hair. Not overly bushy around his genitals but hair is an asset to me. I find body hair sexy.




MistressVnus -> RE: hairy submissives and slaves (3/16/2008 12:34:48 PM)

quote:

chest yes, legs ok, back NO, balls and anus, NO


DITTO!!




Lashra -> RE: hairy submissives and slaves (3/16/2008 1:06:22 PM)

No hairy ones for me. I make my sub wax himself to get rid of body hair. I just do not like it and now that he has started going clean and smooth, he prefers it to being hairy.

~Lashra




Trashbagboy74 -> RE: hairy submissives and slaves (3/16/2008 1:11:53 PM)

I am Hairy all over but i like it when a Mistress uses Duct Tape to remove the hair between the legs and the ass. I enjoy this alot but when she send me to work with the Duck Tape on for a Week and when the weekend comes she wants to see it and asked me to Prepair for what she is going to do. I wanted to know if any Mistress/Domme on how they Remove the Hair between the Legs and Ass?




SweetDommes -> RE: hairy submissives and slaves (3/16/2008 1:13:24 PM)

I find body hair to be disgusting, personally.  I love to lick and bite, and getting hair on my tongue just grosses me out entirely.  Our boys are/will be hairless.




Pyrrsefanie -> RE: hairy submissives and slaves (3/16/2008 1:14:01 PM)

If I'm dressing him up... nah, I prefer hairless.

But other than that... I love love LOVE having some chest hair to run my fingers through.  Makes me purr like a kitten.  [:D]




LadyPact -> RE: hairy submissives and slaves (3/16/2008 1:21:07 PM)

I have My boy shaved, in regular fashion.  "From neck to nuts" as he calls it.

Yes, having a male sub shave both chest and genital hair is viewed by many as a sign of submission.  It comes in rather handy for things like wax play, cbt, etc. 




MiladyElaine -> RE: hairy submissives and slaves (3/16/2008 1:22:24 PM)

I like My men to have hair on their head, none on their face and overall sparce.
Chest and legs are ok if not too bad but absolutely NO back hair!   I remember seeing Chuck Norris, one of My hereos on tv fighting Bruce Lee in the early days and he had back hair something awful!  A complete turnoff.




thetammyjo -> RE: hairy submissives and slaves (3/16/2008 2:16:59 PM)

I only like hair on the face (a certain type only) and on the head (again, certain length only) and no where else.

Yes, it does take time and energy to keep the body that free of hair. I consider that one of the daily tasks one of my slaves is required to perform for my preference.

The reason is partly because I prefer that look but also because it gives me more access directly to skin itself with the comfort of hair for the types of activities I like to do.




sandman000000 -> RE: hairy submissives and slaves (3/16/2008 2:28:08 PM)

As i read the progession of the conversation i must say i found myself intrigued. I myself dislike body hair and as i read i found myself wondering where that dislike came from. I think ultimatley though the like and dislike of hairless submissives comes from a mixture of the 50's and of the modern era. Social concept is that a women is a natural submissive and a man is a natural dominant. Mix that with the current age, where a greater percentage of men prefer their women shaved, and i think you find your answer. I think over-all that men who submit want to bring that 50's image into their persona while mixing it with the modern age and its kinks, fetishes, and beliefs. I myself am a switch, though primarily Dominant, and i keep myself clean shaven, and ask my submissives or signifigant other to do the same. There are a variety of reasons i do it to myself and ask my other to do it, though i think the main reason is there is nothing more sensual, commanding, or connecting as full skin on skin contact with nothing in between. These are my thoughts on the subject, though please keep in mind that as i type this, i am going on 29 hours of no sleep. Forgive the errors or rambling.

Vincent




LadyMarmalade1 -> RE: hairy submissives and slaves (3/16/2008 2:41:52 PM)

Thank you everyone for your thoughts and ideas. This thread is turning out to be very interesting. One thing that I'd like to add is that while I dont like my slave to be hairfree I have experimented with waxing as a form of (fun) torture, which really was great fun and left my slave with memories of the experience every time he saw the hairless patches on his bum. However I really do find a man with his genital region completly hairfree to be rather funny looking.
Thanks again , I am going to bed. I look forward to checking this thread in the morning.
Lady M.




MistressVnus -> RE: hairy submissives and slaves (3/16/2008 2:49:16 PM)

Oh, and I forgot to add, I like a woman's pussy to be shaved, as well.  I just don't like pubic hair, most of all.
And even if a man's chest is hairy, which I like, I like the hair around his nipples to be shaved.  Almost more humiliting than a complete chest shave, as it is more obvious by contrast.




MsStarlett -> RE: hairy submissives and slaves (3/16/2008 3:25:08 PM)

This is obviously a personal preference thing.  I prefer 'manly men' and therefore prefer furry chests, but even I prefer different 'looks' on different males.  It's kind of like some look better with beards, some better without.  My body builders look better with all the hair removed.  My meatier boys look better furry.  'Bears' are good.  Yet in all cases, I prefer my boys to keep the pubes.  I don't like my men to look like prepubescent boys... I want that part to look manly.  Besides, when binding the genitals, or using the chain mail cock cage... it's SO much more fun to get a few pubes caught in there.  As for hairs in the teeth, I receive oral, I don't give it to subs.




LadyHibiscus -> RE: hairy submissives and slaves (3/16/2008 5:11:20 PM)

I like the genital area to be clean shaven, or very closely trimmed.  Otherwise, I like what looks good on the guy.  I love silky smooth hairless skin...and I love bears!   To me, hairless does not equal unmasculine.  I don't like that odd patchy hair that some men get.  That SO gets removed.  Odd tufts, too.  I shouldn't need a weedwacker to do what I want, yanno?




MistressVnus -> RE: hairy submissives and slaves (3/16/2008 5:25:57 PM)

quote:

Yet in all cases, I prefer my boys to keep the pubes.


Yeeeccchkkkkhhh!!  I don't like on either sex.  And don't let me find anyone's pubes in my toys, either!!

Yeeeccchhhkkkkhh!!!




petdave -> RE: hairy submissives and slaves (3/16/2008 7:26:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact
It comes in rather handy for things like wax play, cbt, etc. 


Especially fireplay. Nothing smells quite like burned hair [:'(]

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyMarmalade1
However I really do find a man with his genital region completly hairfree to be rather funny looking.


But... that makes "it" look longer! [&o]

i'm a bit surprised to see all the replies that chest hair is okay, but back hair isn't... i would have expected it to be pretty interchangeable.




Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
2.734375E-02