pixelslave
Posts: 1444
Joined: 8/19/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: undergroundsea quote:
ORIGINAL: MsFay My personal belief is that the most out there are bottoms that just like being dominated and really not interest in being a sub so much as the feeling of being submissive. A sub to me is someone that really is about the other person's needs and reconciles himself with that whereas a bottom is inherently self-centered in that his needs are the motivating factor. In my opinion, a bottom is someone who enjoys being at the receiving end of an activity (usually some form of physical play)without exchanging power. The gratification here usually comes from the body's physical response to the physical activity versus a psychological exhiliration of being in a submissive role. Thus, one can speak of a dominant bottom. A bottom may be selfish and focused on his needs alone, or he may be compassionate and take interest in needs of his topping partner. I'm very inclined to agree with you Sea. Lady Pact's definitions also had a familiar ring I'd be somewhat comfortable with if one had to force labels on everyone; categorizing them such that they fit into nice and neatly labeled slots regardless of whether they were fully comfortable wearing those particular labels or not. My problem is that doing that doesn't allow for the continuum of variations that normally exists between polar extremes. quote:
I define a sub to be someone who enjoys feelings of submission to whatever degree. I don't think there is a dichotomy of either sub or not sub, but rather a continuum that defines degrees of submission. Exactly! There are other variables as well. I'm not going to fully submit to a woman I barely know compared to a woman I have an established relationship with! quote:
I think a person who enjoys the feeling of being submissive but is self-centered and focused on his needs only is a selfish sub, not a bottom. That thought has a great deal of merit. Narcissism could indeed be part of the issue. As an aside, it could also be an issue of a person who wants to give, but only in the manner they wish to, thus making them a 'controlling giver'. LOL! As this lifestyle is also known for predatory behavior, consider the situation of a submissive who has an 'empty tank'. Perhaps he's been submissive to an ungiving partner for such a great length of time, that the submissive's unmet needs have become so immense he's not presently able to give to another in the manner that he normally would be until his tank has been at least partially refilled. Is he selfish, needy, or merely in need of appropriate nurturing or attention of some kind to refill his 'tank' so he can be the submissive once again that's part of his normal nature? Perhaps that's something to consider that may help explain why some subs are a bit too eager to have their needs met. It doesn't mean they don't want to give every bit as much as the dommes who want to receive what they have to offer; perhaps a case of everyone involved having had unmet needs for far too long... quote:
As I ponder this topic, I am wondering if a desire to please is essential to being submissive. While it is commonly thought to be, I am not convinced it is a necessary component of submission. For instance, a prisoner may be in a submissive role to a prison guard but does not necessarily have a desire to please the prison guard. Similarly, it's conceivable that there is a sub whose submission comes from a place of emotional masochism (it's not the same as bottoming) and has little to do with pleasing. Cheers, Sea That's an excellent question and is something along the lines of things I've been pondering of late myself. I believe there are some who give or do things for others in the hope of being rewarded. As such, they give with hidden "strings attached", then are disappointed when their manipulative behavior doesn't give them what they desire. There are also those who do good things for others hoping they will be liked; in essence using it as a means to prop up their self esteem. I'd like to think a submissive does things for others because the act of doing things to make things better for another brings them joy and happiness from the act of their giving. If it's for any other reason, to me, they are clearly creating an internal expectation for themselves they will receive some other reward; something that may never come, causing resentment to build within. Yet, if the people they give to never show their appreciation, eventually the submissive's other basic needs as a human being will not be met. Regardless of what is said, a flesh and blood submissive is still human and can't possibly give endlessly of himself without receiving something from their dominant that fills their other needs as a person. That's why I continue to say it can't be all about the dominant, but instead must be about "us". - pixel
_____________________________
Chivalry isn't dead! It's for those who have it in their hearts & are willing to be taught. It's a way of life, a code of honor; this one's armor still needs some polishing!
|