quote:
ORIGINAL: mistressbadgirl
There is a great debate when it comes to the subject of Financial Domination. To some its veiwed simply as thievery( per a profile i read earlier) It is, though it is hard to describe something willingly given up as being stolen.
quote:
and/or prostitution(as read in many others).
More difficult to call here...sadly, in many instances financial tribute/"gifts" buys you nothing but time from the female dominant in question.
quote:
In MY opinionI believe those opinions give the submisive a way to top from the bottom.
Actually, since the submissive is paying for something, even if it is only time, from the female dominant he/she (the submissive) has already "topped" her, when you look at it from another angle. But to address your point, which seems to be that having an opinion that contradicts your viewpoint means that the submissive is trying to top you. Why? Because their opinion does contradict yours and that these two opinions address moral issues for the submissive?
quote:
( for those that dont know what t In the true nature of submission, the submissive is required to be obidient and never question the desires of his Owner.
Actually, while the definition of submission means a yielding of your will to that of another and that obedience is sometimes present, full obedience is not a given. There are struggles to submit that always take place. And, NOWHERE in any definition is it stated that the submissive will never question the desire of his owner. That may be true in YOUR dynamic but it is not necessarily true in every dynamic. Personally, I doubt that it is true in your dynamic also since submissives are human and, just like you, question their partner's motives/desires/behavior at least occasionally...if not overtly, at least to themselves. And let's face it, many female dominants require tribute be paid by a submissive that isn't even theirs but only under consideration.
quote:
Anytime the submissive is awarded the valuble time of a Dominant he/she should treat it as the honor it is. Gifts/tribute is only a way for a slave to show his appreciation for even being taken on as a submissive in the first place.
In what alternate universe does this take place? Quick, let me see hands: how many female submissives with a male dominant think that a female dominant's time is more valuable than your male dominant's time? How many female submissives are willing to pay financial tribute/gifts to a male dominant for their "valuable" time? I would venture that not many female submissives do this...now perhaps it is because there are many more male dominants available for female submissives vs. the number of female dominants available for male submissives OR perhaps it is because the female submissives see financial gifts/tributes/domination for the fetish/con game/B.S. it is.
