RE: my take on financial domination (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


MissxLuna -> RE: my take on financial domination (9/23/2008 10:22:56 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SoulRavager

I think your thinking is flawed for two reasons.

First, theres a difference between having control over someones money and demanding they give it to you. I have had control over slaves bank accounts but not felt the need for them to spend that money on me to prove their submission.

Secondly, if it is so necessary, why is there a gender gap? You rarely if ever find male doms demanding tribute.


I've known several. It's not that rare




ExSteelAgain -> RE: my take on financial domination (9/24/2008 4:18:57 AM)

My friends have told me economic hardships are affecting the pro-Domme business due to their acceptance of CDO’s (derivative financial instruments) from too many submissives who have not made good on their obligations. We should do something to help the Dommes and design a financial bailout to create a stimulus for their business.

The toxic submissive debt is out of hand. I can see Bernanke and Paulson testifying before Congress answering questions about pro-Dommes. Maybe a few pro-Dommes in full regalia called to testify. These are tough times.




MasterJFrancis -> RE: my take on financial domination (9/24/2008 4:41:44 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mistressbadgirl

shame that a few have given Us a bad name, but then again those that practice with true intent will always stand alone. The lifestyle is full of fakes and frauds who discredit financial domination. My opinion will not change.. I feel that those who seek to serve in a truly submissive nature will have no problem submitting tribute


Sigh..... financial domination..... submitting tribute.... the names change but the profession is the same, the oldest one in fact. A bad name can't be given to where it's been earned many times over. The mark of a true submissive has nothing to do what they give or pay you, it has to do with what they allow themselves to be.

So what's the purpose of the post? Is business having a down turn and you are looking to drum up more clients?

The lifestyle has a wide range of acceptance, but at the core it's about making a choice and for you, you have assigned a monetary value to it. Whatever floats your boat, however, your opinions of what is a true anything is rubbish.... but considering the source.... it's expected.... do you advertise in the yellow pages too?




MmeGigs -> RE: my take on financial domination (9/24/2008 4:48:48 AM)

quote:

and ANY DOMME on here that says they wouldnt take money willing offered to them is a damn LIAR .. straight and simple.. because I dont know ONE FEMALE that would turn away money that was free and came without demands or expectations of sexual favors. NONE... some could sit here and say they would .. BUT thats a lie..


If it makes you feel good you can go on believing that, but there are some of us out here who find offers of cash - with or without strings attached - to be a serious turn-off. 




Lashra -> RE: my take on financial domination (9/24/2008 4:53:36 AM)

My take on it is pretty simple, if s/he(the sub or client) wants to pay for the services, that is their decision. They are adults and who are we to babysit them?. If they do not wish to pay, then they find a Domme who does not charge. It is pretty easy and I have yet to understand what the big fucking debate is about. Adults make their OWN decisions and in the USA supposedly have the freedom to do so.

~Lashra




Lashra -> RE: my take on financial domination (9/24/2008 4:57:41 AM)

Your wrong, I guess that makes me a damn liar. I do this because its how I live my relationship. I have never and never will charge my submissive for the love that I give him or for our relationship.

Throw stones at you? No why should I? When its plain to see your just generalizing and we all know (or should) what that means.

~Lashra




MissIsis -> RE: my take on financial domination (9/24/2008 5:02:42 AM)

Those who are submitting to financial domination:
-sports fans paying hundreds of dollars to go watch a game
-concert goers
-some unions
-the mortgage companies
-credit card companies
-the airlines

Does the fact that people are providing tribute to these companies for a service being offered, make them submissive? 

Just a thought & only my opinion.

(This is not really in response to anyone in particular here)




simpleplan2 -> RE: my take on financial domination (9/24/2008 5:45:55 AM)

I've never understood why everyone gets so upset about this topic...or, more to the point, upset about the way in which someone presents this topic.  If you don't want to pay, don't.  If you do want to pay, do.  If you want tribute, find someone to give it to you.  That's all pretty easy.

As far as how the person presents it...well, seems to me about 50% come on here presenting his or her way as the "one true way".  Uh huh.  Whatever.  If someone wants to delude him or herself, who am I to enlighten her?  As far as I am concerned, posts like this are pretty much just words on a screen...don't mean much at all.




GreedyTop -> RE: my take on financial domination (9/24/2008 6:52:30 AM)

lol simple.. and each time someone pulls the 'one twue way' card, theyre going to get raked over the coals...




persephonee -> RE: my take on financial domination (9/24/2008 7:00:41 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop

lol simple.. and each time someone pulls the 'one twue way' card, theyre going to get raked over the coals...


wait...thats not the same as fireplay...nevermind....morning GT




GreedyTop -> RE: my take on financial domination (9/24/2008 7:05:37 AM)

lol pers




JohnWarren -> RE: my take on financial domination (9/24/2008 7:07:14 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mistressbadgirl

shame that a few have given Us a bad name, but then again those that practice with true intent will always stand alone. The lifestyle is full of fakes and frauds who discredit financial domination. My opinion will not change.. I feel that those who seek to serve in a truly submissive nature will have no problem submitting tribute


Oh, those who discredit financial domination are fakes and frauds?

To tell you the truth, badgirl, if you wish to find the person doing the most in this notestream to discredit this behavior, I suggest you check out the closest mirror.  Such ad hominum attacks suggest a bad case of dom's disease or someone whose source of income is being challenged.




CreativeDominant -> RE: my take on financial domination (9/24/2008 7:28:23 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MissxLuna

quote:

ORIGINAL: SoulRavager

I think your thinking is flawed for two reasons.

First, theres a difference between having control over someones money and demanding they give it to you. I have had control over slaves bank accounts but not felt the need for them to spend that money on me to prove their submission.

Secondly, if it is so necessary, why is there a gender gap? You rarely if ever find male doms demanding tribute.


I've known several. It's not that rare



Really?  Because in the 10 years I've been in this, I have yet to meet a male dominant in the clubs or on the sites I've been a part of who was into it.  I've yet to meet the female submissive who has ever paid financial tribute to a dominant.





CreativeDominant -> RE: my take on financial domination (9/24/2008 7:32:54 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MissIsis

Those who are submitting to financial domination:
-sports fans paying hundreds of dollars to go watch a game
-concert goers
-some unions
-the mortgage companies
-credit card companies
-the airlines

Does the fact that people are providing tribute to these companies for a service being offered, make them submissive? 

Just a thought & only my opinion.

(This is not really in response to anyone in particular here)



No...and here's the difference:  All the venues noted above are "IN BUSINESS".  The OP stated right out that she is NOT a pro, therefore the financial tribute she demands is to begin/stay in a relationship that is NOT provider/client-based.  In short, the venues above are business...the OP is personal.

I daresay...you're getting much more of  your money's worth by giving money to any of the institutions you have listed.




MrRodgers -> RE: my take on financial domination (9/24/2008 7:37:29 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mistressbadgirl

There is a great debate when it comes to the subject of Financial Domination. To some its veiwed simply as thievery( per a profile i read earlier) and/or prostitution(as read in many others). In MY opinionI believe those opinions give the submisive a way to top from the bottom.( for those that dont know what t In the true nature of submission, the submissive is required to be obidient and never question the desires of his Owner. Anytime the submissive is awarded the valuble time of a Dominant he/she should treat it as the honor it is.  Gifts/tribute is only a way for a slave to show his appreciation for even being taken on as a submissive in the first place.
 
What unmitigated bullshit.
 
First of all...a sub submits and that's all. It may be many just don't want to type it out but this is about a slave and yes...a slave contributes to the household with the balance saved and invested on behalf of the slave.
 
Anything else is larceny by fraud and comits a slave to a financial slavery that should end soon as the slave can find a new owner....and forthwith.




GreedyTop -> RE: my take on financial domination (9/24/2008 7:47:06 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

quote:

ORIGINAL: MissxLuna

quote:

ORIGINAL: SoulRavager

I think your thinking is flawed for two reasons.

First, theres a difference between having control over someones money and demanding they give it to you. I have had control over slaves bank accounts but not felt the need for them to spend that money on me to prove their submission.

Secondly, if it is so necessary, why is there a gender gap? You rarely if ever find male doms demanding tribute.


I've known several. It's not that rare



Really?  Because in the 10 years I've been in this, I have yet to meet a male dominant in the clubs or on the sites I've been a part of who was into it.  I've yet to meet the female submissive who has ever paid financial tribute to a dominant.




CD.. I have an ex who was 'house dom' for a club.. he got paid 'tribute'




CreativeDominant -> RE: my take on financial domination (9/24/2008 11:56:48 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

quote:

ORIGINAL: MissxLuna

quote:

ORIGINAL: SoulRavager

I think your thinking is flawed for two reasons.

First, theres a difference between having control over someones money and demanding they give it to you. I have had control over slaves bank accounts but not felt the need for them to spend that money on me to prove their submission.

Secondly, if it is so necessary, why is there a gender gap? You rarely if ever find male doms demanding tribute.


I've known several. It's not that rare



Really?  Because in the 10 years I've been in this, I have yet to meet a male dominant in the clubs or on the sites I've been a part of who was into it.  I've yet to meet the female submissive who has ever paid financial tribute to a dominant.




CD.. I have an ex who was 'house dom' for a club.. he got paid 'tribute'



Interesting...My question would be this:  Was he paid tribute as the 'house dom' or did he receive it from his submissives in order for them to buy the privilege of him deigning to spend time with them?




ExSteelAgain -> RE: my take on financial domination (9/24/2008 4:56:34 PM)

It is different with Doms being paid, Things are never so cut and dried when Doms do their thing for money. It is something like Slave A helps me with the rent, car payment and so and so and I need to give her some time. You are still welcome here anytime, but you have to realize things are crazy and I have to take care of things. By the way, I have someone I want you to meet. Heh.




GreedyTop -> RE: my take on financial domination (9/24/2008 4:58:44 PM)

CD.. I'm not sure how it worked, to be honest.. we'd already split by then.




tazzygirl -> RE: my take on financial domination (9/24/2008 5:04:09 PM)

i have a follow up question

the "tributes" that are paid.. what happens to that money?




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875