rulemylife
Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyEllen Question - from a confirmed British heathen, who simply doesnt get it If Palin believes the Bible to be true and holds herself to be a Christian, then why on Earth is she not following the guidance of the Bible on how women should conduct themselves and their proper place in the world? On the one hand she seems to advertise her fulfilment of the recognised role of women according to the Bible, but on the other she does so to gain support for a role which according to the Bible is for men only. And this is to leave to one side her other many transgressions against that which is written. I have no problem with people describing themselves as Christian running for any office, and no problem with women who so describe themselves doing so; where my confusion comes is in the apparent position Palin holds that the Bible is true - so she is either deliberately violating its counsel, has never read it (which in Christian teaching would be a rightful thing) or she doesnt really think its true. Answers please to "Palin, the Bible and the place of women", c/o CM Fora. E Yes, the most wonderful thing about Christianity, and religion in general, is that the absolutes only apply when you want to condemn another, but if it is for you, or those you approve of, anything can be rationalized. Southern Baptists back Palin despite view on women's role ... Southern Baptists back Palin despite view on women's role ... the first female on the party's ticket in history — has thrilled conservative Christians. ... http://www.usatoday.com/news/religion/2008-10-02-palin-baptists_N.htm RALEIGH, N.C. — Within the nation's largest Protestant denomination, a woman may not lead a church or a home. But prominent Southern Baptists see nothing wrong with Sarah Palin serving as vice president — or perhaps even commander-in-chief someday.In other words: A woman can run the White House, just not her own house.
|