Aneirin
Posts: 6121
Joined: 3/18/2006 From: Tamaris Status: offline
|
I tend to think on the extreme, the 'what if ', senario and good old Murphy's law, '' What can go wrong will '', but I change the ''will '' into '' can'', so I am prepared for problems as they arise. With the extreme porn law, I do not trust those that would wield such a law, as it is the very wording of the bill has invited concern from many human rights organisations. Now either the bill proposers suffer an extreme case of bad legal language usage , or they actually mean what they said, I feel professionals in law know what they are doing, they are not incompetant, so their wording was intended to go through as is, something which can be used as control and even thought policing. As to the extent of powers that might come with this law, vague though it is, remembering that the special anti terror police were used to freeze Icelandic funds, a total misuse of their purpose, I am wary, and perhaps I will change my activities to err on the safe side, but at the same time see it as a restriction on my human rights, something as a little person, I have no power to stop except support the organisations that act for human rights. Human rights and politics don't often coincide in reality, politics is about power and control. But then if one was active in support of certain political monitoring groups, then one would no doubt come to the attention of the authorities, make too big a noise they might look deeper, and hey presto, maybe a vague law can be applied to shut them up and ridicule them. I just tend to think of what can be possible and work between that and as it is now.
_____________________________
Everything we are is the result of what we have thought, the mind is everything, what we think, we become - Guatama Buddha Conservatism is distrust of people tempered by fear - William Gladstone
|