Owner59
Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006 From: Dirty Jersey Status: offline
|
"But I do think some "advanced techniques" might hold promise in this situation." They may also hold great peril. That`s the biggest problem with the argument. Torture ,whatever name you give it,doesn`t work. It`s not accurate and you get a bunch of bullshit info.The guy will say anything,to make it stop.That`s not good intel work.That`s just lazy. dick,the vice torturer, claimed that using "enhanced interrogation" showed that there was WMD in Iraq and an Iraqi link to a-queda,Neither of which were true. Then, we find out that torture wasn`t used to find links,but to force false confessions of links.Proof that torture doesn`t work for getting info.Proof that torture works well for getting false intel. And or military are shown small doses of water-boarding to prepare them for what often happens to captured soldiers,torture to get false confessions.
< Message edited by Owner59 -- 5/24/2009 5:27:18 PM >
_____________________________
"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals" President Obama
|