Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Public BDSM - should we tolerate it?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Public BDSM - should we tolerate it? Page: <<   < prev  12 13 [14] 15 16   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Public BDSM - should we tolerate it? - 7/14/2009 7:07:44 PM   
NihilusZero


Posts: 4036
Joined: 9/10/2008
From: Nashville, TN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BossyShoeBitch

(No one start a fucking thread on what constitutes good judgement for gawds sake)

It is the questions that force us to reconsider the most fundamental and habitual of our social constructs that are most important.

My "good judgment" consists of, simply, not acting in a way that directly harms another's person or property. That's it. Except for possible small print to make exceptions for people who are actively invading a non-consensual person's private space by shoving themselves in it or clearly doing acts with no intent other than to molest another individual's public experience.

< Message edited by NihilusZero -- 7/14/2009 7:08:36 PM >


_____________________________

"I know it's all a game
I know they're all insane
I know it's all in vain
I know that I'm to blame."
~Siouxsie & the Banshees


NihilusZero.com

CM Sex God du Jour
CM Hall Monitor

(in reply to BossyShoeBitch)
Profile   Post #: 261
RE: Public BDSM - should we tolerate it? - 7/14/2009 7:08:30 PM   
CallaFirestormBW


Posts: 3651
Joined: 6/29/2008
Status: offline
quote:

Here's where I tend to perhaps nitpick the word "responsibility" when it's used. I mean, objectively speaking, I guess that, yes, the responsibility lies in at the risk of alienating one's self (as we talked about above)...but I still think that is just a consequence one must understand when choosing to express their freedoms. I don't necessarily like the idea that it's an active responsibility that we must abide by (which would be a decree to someone of how to live their life, even if it's not directly harming anyone).


I can concur, to a certain extent. Perhaps 'responsibility' is not the right word in general, though it didn't occur to me that there might be another way to phrase it, since I guess I -do- think of it as a responsibility--and one that I taught my offspring, because I do think it is important to be considerate of others when determining whether or not to do something in a given situation.

I also see your point about the issue of boorishness being completely self-balancing, with those who share one's perspectives being willing to spend time in one's company, and those who do not choosing different company... and that, if one is boorish enough, by a given group's standards, that pool of individuals willing to spend time in one's company would likely dry up to naught.

I think the only place we may end up disagreeing is whether or not there is any intrinsic value on a society-wide level to choosing a more considerate, flexible, and socially considerate way of presenting oneself (or choosing environments where one's chosen manners of presentation will be comfortably appropriate -in general-). I think that there -is- some value in that, with the concession that, in order to effect social change, there will be occasions when the envelope will -have- to be pushed... the only addition I'd make is that sometimes, a gentle, persistent pushing is more effective than an overblown, super-inflated shove, and to me, that is where good manners come in, even when one must push the envelope to make a valuable point.

I can give an example of the above. I've worked at the same job for 5 years, and have several tattoos and piercings that are difficult if not impossible to cover without going to special lengths, including one on my collarbone that peeks out, at least in part, in every single thing I wear except for a couple of Victorian shirtwaists I wear on occasion.

Now I've interacted with one of our faculty for every one of those 5 years. I've stood in his office, dealt with him in clinic and at regulatory meetings, and hunched over the computer together hashing out the wording on clinical protocols. Several days ago, I took some papers for him to sign down to the clinic, and was wearing a summer top that clearly showed the entire tattoo that I have on my collarbone. He had apparently missed all the other times that I'd had bits of it showing, but he noticed it this day, and commented, and we spent a couple of minutes taking about the significance and the other pieces I've had done, and the safety issues around penetrative body modification and comparisons to plastic surgery, and it was a -very- pleasant conversation.

Later, he dropped by our office, and he said to me (in front of my boss and my boss's boss) "You know, any time I'd seen someone with tattoos, I'd always felt very negative towards it, because the people who have them have always been so curt and nasty to me, and really difficult to work with. I couldn't see how someone could have tattoos and still be professional. I admit that I probably fostered that by being rude myself, but you have -always- been polite and pleasant, even when I wasn't polite or pleasant to you, and you have -always- been the consummate professional. In the time we've worked together, I would never have guessed that you were a tattooed person, and especially that you would have more than one tattoo, and you've given me a new perspective on why someone might want to have that done and that some people might -not- be ashamed of it in 20 years. It never would have occurred to me." Then, he asked my boss if -she- had any tattoos, and was surprised... but with a grin... when she said yes, but explained that hers wasn't someplace it could be seen.

I think manners and consideration of others matter, and I think that our social progress might actually go faster if we could learn to present our arguments in ways that respect the person on the other end as a human being, first, and then consider presentation of a perspective on its own merits. Of course, I don't expect anything... but I have to admit that it is very pleasant and does incline me to a more generous and open perspective when it happens.

Dame Calla



< Message edited by CallaFirestormBW -- 7/14/2009 7:12:16 PM >


_____________________________

***
Said to me recently: "Look, I know you're the "voice of reason"... but dammit, I LIKE being unreasonable!!!!"

"Your mind is more interested in the challenge of becoming than the challenge of doing." Jon Benson, Bodybuilder/Trainer

(in reply to NihilusZero)
Profile   Post #: 262
RE: Public BDSM - should we tolerate it? - 7/14/2009 7:10:31 PM   
Ialdabaoth


Posts: 1073
Joined: 5/4/2008
From: Tempe, AZ
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: NihilusZero

quote:

ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW

It is disturbing that someone would actually take the statement of "it is important to have good manners, and to respect the people around you when you choose how to present yourself in public" and twist it into "You must be homophobic and right wing", and actually, it sort of proves my point. *sigh*

Agreed. Yet, a lot of the arguments in support of prioritized courtesy seem to keep using the word "responsibility" as if it should be socially mandatory. Socially preferable? I'd probably agree with that. But there's a big enough difference between the two that I can understand it coming across to some viewers that it's just a reflection of mandated, projected morality.



The weirdness comes from most people's inability to separate 'preferrable and un-preferrable outcomes' from 'good and evil actions'.

Here's the thing:

Ultimately, if you aren't polite, respectful, and courteous, you're liable to have some pretty big problems in social settings. If you can't or won't normalize yourself to the group's expectations, the group will punish you.

Most people assign some sort of moral agency to group social dynamics, which is strange considering that it has about as much sentience as the weather. Saying, "well, he wouldn't fit in, so of course he lost his job" is actually about as rational as saying "Hurricane Katrina was God's punishment for tolerating faggotry".

Yes, there are rules. And yes, people "should" follow them - if by "should" you mean "would be advised to, assuming they want things to go smoother". But the thing is, plenty of people can flout those rules with impunity, and plenty of people get shit on no matter what they do, so "be courteous and respectful" is in no way the whole story.

Some pretty obvious facts:

1. If you go out in public in bondage and electrical tape, you will get looks, and you will stir up trouble. But if you're 40 years old and 350 lbs, you'll stir up far, far worse trouble than if you're a 19-year-old girl with a porn-star body, and if you're the 19-year-old girl, you're likely to stir up a bunch of positive and exploitable situations that will make up for the trouble you will cause. A model can turn a public plaza into her own private dungeon, and everyone else will feel like they're the ones tresspassing. Anyone else is clearly the one in the wrong. Is this fair? Fuck no, but it's life.

2. Again, if you go out in public in bondage and electrical tape, led around on a leash, if it looks like your partner is some sort of Hollywood big-shot who makes hundreds of thousands per year, you'll probably have a lot easier time of it than if you look like a pair of 19 year old high-school dropouts who "probably still live in their parents' basement". Regardless of how much power or money you actually have, if it looks like messing with you could bring down a circling pack of lawyers, you'll be more likely to get a free pass. Is this fair? Fuck no, but it's life.
Everything is just opportunity cost. For most people, the cost of going out and flouting the rules is far too high. For other people, it's trivial. Society has spoken.

< Message edited by Ialdabaoth -- 7/14/2009 7:12:59 PM >

(in reply to NihilusZero)
Profile   Post #: 263
RE: Public BDSM - should we tolerate it? - 7/14/2009 7:11:01 PM   
agirl


Posts: 4530
Joined: 6/14/2004
Status: offline
quote:


NihilusZero.com
quote:

ORIGINAL: NihilusZero

quote:

ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW

It is disturbing that someone would actually take the statement of "it is important to have good manners, and to respect the people around you when you choose how to present yourself in public" and twist it into "You must be homophobic and right wing", and actually, it sort of proves my point. *sigh*

Agreed. Yet, a lot of the arguments in support of prioritized courtesy seem to keep using the word "responsibility" as if it should be socially mandatory. Socially preferable? I'd probably agree with that. But there's a big enough difference between the two that I can understand it coming across to some viewers that it's just a reflection of mandated, projected morality.



That really says it all for me. No matter how much something might *feel* like a responsibility for ME ........  doesn't mean I see it as something other people *feel* or ought to *feel. Crumbs, a lot of things I *feel* responsible for, I actually am NOT. Sometimes I have to *get over myself* as US people say.

agirl

That applies to LOTS of things.



(in reply to NihilusZero)
Profile   Post #: 264
RE: Public BDSM - should we tolerate it? - 7/14/2009 7:15:36 PM   
NihilusZero


Posts: 4036
Joined: 9/10/2008
From: Nashville, TN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW

I think the only place we may end up disagreeing is whether or not there is any intrinsic value on a society-wide level to choosing a more considerate, flexible, and socially considerate way of presenting oneself (or choosing environments where one's chosen manners of presentation will be comfortably appropriate -in general-. I think that there -is- some value in that, with the concession that, in order to effect social change, there will be occasions when the envelope will -have- to be pushed... the only addition I'd make is that sometimes, a gentle, persistent pushing is more effective than an overblown, super-inflated shove, and to me, that is where good manners come in, even when one must push the envelope to make a valuable point.

Actually, I think I do agree with you that there are are probably better results to be wrought from a society that functions with courtesy as a normal way of interacting...but I'd be dangerously afraid of a civilization that has been taken to that place via mandate and the risk of consequence (legal or moral) rather than by virtue of just having the courteous people 'win out' as the greater populace over time.

This is why I favor a self-correcting system..it more ensures a "real" transition to amicable, courteous interactions.




_____________________________

"I know it's all a game
I know they're all insane
I know it's all in vain
I know that I'm to blame."
~Siouxsie & the Banshees


NihilusZero.com

CM Sex God du Jour
CM Hall Monitor

(in reply to CallaFirestormBW)
Profile   Post #: 265
RE: Public BDSM - should we tolerate it? - 7/14/2009 7:16:05 PM   
agirl


Posts: 4530
Joined: 6/14/2004
Status: offline
In between the model and the fat guy, there are the rest of us really rather ordinary people. And yes, loads won't dare rock the boat .....and some have the chutzpah and the *whatever it is* to do exactly that.

agirl


(in reply to Ialdabaoth)
Profile   Post #: 266
RE: Public BDSM - should we tolerate it? - 7/14/2009 7:19:57 PM   
daintydimples


Posts: 967
Joined: 7/6/2009
Status: offline
I've really been enjoying this thread. 

(in reply to agirl)
Profile   Post #: 267
RE: Public BDSM - should we tolerate it? - 7/14/2009 7:21:00 PM   
Ialdabaoth


Posts: 1073
Joined: 5/4/2008
From: Tempe, AZ
Status: offline
An addendum, from the 'homophobic' angle:

George Takei gets to be openly homosexual. Matthew Sheppard does not.

Marylin Manson gets to be openly anti-Christian. The West Memphis Three do not.

(somewhat dated now) Sammy Davis Jr. gets to have a white girlfriend. Emmett Till does not.

Does this make sense?


(in reply to agirl)
Profile   Post #: 268
RE: Public BDSM - should we tolerate it? - 7/14/2009 7:23:36 PM   
NihilusZero


Posts: 4036
Joined: 9/10/2008
From: Nashville, TN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Ialdabaoth

The weirdness comes from most people's inability to separate 'preferrable and un-preferrable outcomes' from 'good and evil actions'.

Here's the thing:

Ultimately, if you aren't polite, respectful, and courteous, you're liable to have some pretty big problems in social settings. If you can't or won't normalize yourself to the group's expectations, the group will punish you.

Most people assign some sort of moral agency to group social dynamics, which is strange considering that it has about as much sentience as the weather. Saying, "well, he wouldn't fit in, so of course he lost his job" is actually about as rational as saying "Hurricane Katrina was God's punishment for tolerating faggotry".

Yes, there are rules. And yes, people "should" follow them - if by "should" you mean "would be advised to, assuming they want things to go smoother". But the thing is, plenty of people can flout those rules with impunity, and plenty of people get shit on no matter what they do, so "be courteous and respectful" is in no way the whole story.

Some pretty obvious facts:

1. If you go out in public in bondage and electrical tape, you will get looks, and you will stir up trouble. But if you're 40 years old and 350 lbs, you'll stir up far, far worse trouble than if you're a 19-year-old girl with a porn-star body, and if you're the 19-year-old girl, you're likely to stir up a bunch of positive and exploitable situations that will make up for the trouble you will cause. A model can turn a public plaza into her own private dungeon, and everyone else will feel like they're the ones tresspassing. Anyone else is clearly the one in the wrong. Is this fair? Fuck no, but it's life.

2. Again, if you go out in public in bondage and electrical tape, led around on a leash, if it looks like your partner is some sort of Hollywood big-shot who makes hundreds of thousands per year, you'll probably have a lot easier time of it than if you look like a pair of 19 year old high-school dropouts who "probably still live in their parents' basement". Regardless of how much power or money you actually have, if it looks like messing with you could bring down a circling pack of lawyers, you'll be more likely to get a free pass. Is this fair? Fuck no, but it's life.
Everything is just opportunity cost. For most people, the cost of going out and flouting the rules is far too high. For other people, it's trivial. Society has spoken.

50 points.

Can't lay it any more bare than that.


< Message edited by NihilusZero -- 7/14/2009 7:36:19 PM >


_____________________________

"I know it's all a game
I know they're all insane
I know it's all in vain
I know that I'm to blame."
~Siouxsie & the Banshees


NihilusZero.com

CM Sex God du Jour
CM Hall Monitor

(in reply to Ialdabaoth)
Profile   Post #: 269
RE: Public BDSM - should we tolerate it? - 7/14/2009 7:24:29 PM   
CallaFirestormBW


Posts: 3651
Joined: 6/29/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: NihilusZero

quote:

ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW

I think the only place we may end up disagreeing is whether or not there is any intrinsic value on a society-wide level to choosing a more considerate, flexible, and socially considerate way of presenting oneself (or choosing environments where one's chosen manners of presentation will be comfortably appropriate -in general-. I think that there -is- some value in that, with the concession that, in order to effect social change, there will be occasions when the envelope will -have- to be pushed... the only addition I'd make is that sometimes, a gentle, persistent pushing is more effective than an overblown, super-inflated shove, and to me, that is where good manners come in, even when one must push the envelope to make a valuable point.

Actually, I think I do agree with you that there are are probably better results to be wrought from a society that functions with courtesy as a normal way of interacting...but I'd be dangerously afraid of a civilization that has been taken to that place via mandate and the risk of consequence (legal or moral) rather than by virtue of just having the courteous people 'win out' as the greater populace over time.

This is why I favor a self-correcting system..it more ensures a "real" transition to amicable, courteous interactions.





Yes, and as I said in the original post, I am not in favor of attempting to legislate good manners either, though I think that is what we've been trying to do for the past 200 years and have utterly failed in any case. In fact, if I were to analyze it, I think I'd determine that legislating "courtesy" or "morality" leads to a =more= discourteous, =more= immoral society, since legislation becomes a form of 'in your face' pushing of a given agenda. And, as I said in the first post, I think that this is an internal process, and that it isn't justification for legislation, though failure to police oneself certainly can contribute, I think, to an excess of freedom-robbing legislation.

Dame Calla

_____________________________

***
Said to me recently: "Look, I know you're the "voice of reason"... but dammit, I LIKE being unreasonable!!!!"

"Your mind is more interested in the challenge of becoming than the challenge of doing." Jon Benson, Bodybuilder/Trainer

(in reply to NihilusZero)
Profile   Post #: 270
RE: Public BDSM - should we tolerate it? - 7/14/2009 7:33:02 PM   
NihilusZero


Posts: 4036
Joined: 9/10/2008
From: Nashville, TN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW

In fact, if I were to analyze it, I think I'd determine that legislating "courtesy" or "morality" leads to a =more= discourteous, =more= immoral society, since legislation becomes a form of 'in your face' pushing of a given agenda.

30 points.

This is what I think is crucial to it all. And...to me, it seems not as much a matter of a legislative issue, but the general thought process  itself because I think the yield is going to be just about the same whether a government chooses that path or an individual. And, if by over-fixating on the concept of courtesy we are failing at the most fundamental aspect of it (tolerance for the freedoms of others) then it's really a dilemma we need to consider as deeply and objectively as possible.

< Message edited by NihilusZero -- 7/14/2009 7:37:07 PM >


_____________________________

"I know it's all a game
I know they're all insane
I know it's all in vain
I know that I'm to blame."
~Siouxsie & the Banshees


NihilusZero.com

CM Sex God du Jour
CM Hall Monitor

(in reply to CallaFirestormBW)
Profile   Post #: 271
RE: Public BDSM - should we tolerate it? - 7/14/2009 7:39:07 PM   
Ialdabaoth


Posts: 1073
Joined: 5/4/2008
From: Tempe, AZ
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: NihilusZero

if by over-fixating on the concept of courtesy we are failing at the most fundamental aspect of it (tolerance for the freedoms of others) it's really a dilemma we need to consider as deeply and objectively as possible.


AHA! That's it! Check this out:

There's two possible motivations for enforcing respect, and they are diametrically opposed.

The first is, "I want to respect you, and I want others to respect you."

The second is, "I want you to respect me, and I want others to respect me."

Guess which one leads to more problems?

(in reply to NihilusZero)
Profile   Post #: 272
RE: Public BDSM - should we tolerate it? - 7/14/2009 7:47:56 PM   
NihilusZero


Posts: 4036
Joined: 9/10/2008
From: Nashville, TN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Ialdabaoth

AHA! That's it! Check this out:

There's two possible motivations for enforcing respect, and they are diametrically opposed.

The first is, "I want to respect you, and I want others to respect you."

The second is, "I want you to respect me, and I want others to respect me."

Guess which one leads to more problems?

Interesting!

And the latter is much more easy to jump into since we each know what we want for ourselves a whole lot more than we know what others what for themselves.


_____________________________

"I know it's all a game
I know they're all insane
I know it's all in vain
I know that I'm to blame."
~Siouxsie & the Banshees


NihilusZero.com

CM Sex God du Jour
CM Hall Monitor

(in reply to Ialdabaoth)
Profile   Post #: 273
RE: Public BDSM - should we tolerate it? - 7/14/2009 7:54:15 PM   
GraciousLady


Posts: 529
Joined: 7/7/2009
Status: offline
The OP wrote...

Homie... You are out in public... I thought I was clear and articulate.

Parents beat the hell out of their kids. People spit flem infected hockers on the ground. Bums sleep on the street. I mean come on. If we want to look at this legally it has already been established on you give up your right to privacy in public along with many other things. Consider the paparazzi. If you do not like it lock yourself in the basement.

My response...
Just because others do rude or unacceptable things in public does not mean you or I should. If that was the case people could do any thing at all. I for one do not want my Ums exposed to things that are not age appropriate nor do I want to see people doing anything that comes to mind. We would be in anarchy if people behaved as you think that should.

(in reply to BossyShoeBitch)
Profile   Post #: 274
RE: Public BDSM - should we tolerate it? - 7/14/2009 7:54:54 PM   
Ialdabaoth


Posts: 1073
Joined: 5/4/2008
From: Tempe, AZ
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: NihilusZero

And the latter is much more easy to jump into since we each know what we want for ourselves a whole lot more than we know what others what for themselves.


Exactly. You can even take it a bit further: In the first case, you're saying "I want everyone to follow their moral code". In the latter, you're saying "I want everyone to follow my moral code".

The first set is borne from an attempt at compassion and understanding. The second is borne from an attempt at power and control.

(in reply to NihilusZero)
Profile   Post #: 275
RE: Public BDSM - should we tolerate it? - 7/14/2009 8:40:58 PM   
SlyStone


Posts: 398
Joined: 12/23/2006
From: Chicago
Status: offline
quote:

Again, if you go out in public in bondage and electrical tape, led around on a leash, if it looks like your partner is some sort of Hollywood big-shot who makes hundreds of thousands per year, you'll probably have a lot easier time of it than if you look like a pair of 19 year old high-school dropouts who "probably still live in their parents' basement". Regardless of how much power or money you actually have, if it looks like messing with you could bring down a circling pack of lawyers, you'll be more likely to get a free pass. Is this fair? Fuck no, but it's life.
Everything is just opportunity cost. For most people, the cost of going out and flouting the rules is far too high. For other people, it's trivial. Society has spoken.




Interesting point, but I would flip it and say that the big shot with lots of money is far LESS likely to got out in public collared and leashed because he has so much more to lose then the high school dropouts out for a lark.

I would think that the foundation of the BDSM movement was built on such outcasts and partly for just that reason, when you have little, and when you are already living on the outskirts of societal mores, it is a small step to an alternate lifestyle and far less noticeable when you are already "different".

And besides, society rarely "speaks" to the poor, it is to those who have and the threat is what it can take away.



_____________________________

Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage.

Anais Nin

(in reply to Ialdabaoth)
Profile   Post #: 276
RE: Public BDSM - should we tolerate it? - 7/14/2009 8:42:49 PM   
Ialdabaoth


Posts: 1073
Joined: 5/4/2008
From: Tempe, AZ
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SlyStone

quote:

Again, if you go out in public in bondage and electrical tape, led around on a leash, if it looks like your partner is some sort of Hollywood big-shot who makes hundreds of thousands per year, you'll probably have a lot easier time of it than if you look like a pair of 19 year old high-school dropouts who "probably still live in their parents' basement". Regardless of how much power or money you actually have, if it looks like messing with you could bring down a circling pack of lawyers, you'll be more likely to get a free pass. Is this fair? Fuck no, but it's life.
Everything is just opportunity cost. For most people, the cost of going out and flouting the rules is far too high. For other people, it's trivial. Society has spoken.




Interesting point, but I would flip it and say that the big shot with lots of money is far LESS likely to got out in public collared and leashed because he has so much more to lose then the high school dropouts out for a lark.

I would think that the foundation of the BDSM movement was built on such outcasts and partly for just that reason, when you have little, and when you are already living on the outskirts of societal mores, it is a small step to an alternate lifestyle and far less noticeable when you are already "different".

And besides, society rarely "speaks" to the poor, it is to those who have and the threat is what it can take away.




On the other hand, as I said before: George Takei vs. Matthew Sheppard; Marylin Manson vs. Damien Echols; Sammy Davis Jr. vs. Emmett Tilly.

(in reply to SlyStone)
Profile   Post #: 277
RE: Public BDSM - should we tolerate it? - 7/15/2009 5:59:52 AM   
SlyStone


Posts: 398
Joined: 12/23/2006
From: Chicago
Status: offline
quote:

Actually, I think I do agree with you that there are are probably better results to be wrought from a society that functions with courtesy as a normal way of interacting...but I'd be dangerously afraid of a civilization that has been taken to that place via mandate and the risk of consequence (legal or moral) rather than by virtue of just having the courteous people 'win out' as the greater populace over time.

This is why I favor a self-correcting system..it more ensures a "real" transition to amicable, courteous interactions.



I think you need to balance that fear with what lies on the other side.

While all societies may not necessarily be self correcting they are at least self evolving, sometimes for the better and sometimes for the worse. In a free and open society such as ours, I think it is how we interact with the people around us that determines the kind of environment that  we live in, much more so then any mandated laws, because society is a monolith, it is the neighborhoods where people really live.

And there are neighborhoods in my city where conditions are do bad, due to poverty and prejudice and a host of social conditions that seem to be beyond our understanding and for sure beyond our control, and you will see a place where courtesy is meaningless and morality is just a word. The police can do almost nothing, the sociologists have thrown up their hands  in defeat, and the public hardly knows that these neighborhoods exist.

I don't think you would want to live there, or like that, I know that I don't.



_____________________________

Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage.

Anais Nin

(in reply to NihilusZero)
Profile   Post #: 278
RE: Public BDSM - should we tolerate it? - 7/15/2009 7:01:56 AM   
CreativeDominant


Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: NihilusZero

quote:

ORIGINAL: BossyShoeBitch

(No one start a fucking thread on what constitutes good judgement for gawds sake)

It is the questions that force us to reconsider the most fundamental and habitual of our social constructs that are most important.

My "good judgment" consists of, simply, not acting in a way that directly harms another's person or property. That's it. Except for possible small print to make exceptions for people who are actively invading a non-consensual person's private space by shoving themselves in it or clearly doing acts with no intent other than to molest another individual's public experience.
But then Nihilus...to throw your own question back at you...who decides whether or not the act's sole or main motivation IS to molest another's public experience?  You?  Then aren't you doing the same as I or any of the others who've posted about what they prefer to see or not see are doing?  Making a judgment call?  Seems to be the only difference is in the degree of what I might tolerate or consider offensive vs. what you or anyone else might tolerate or consider offensive.

Do I want legal or religious mandates on behavior?  A tricky line...laws dictate that you cannot drop your trousers and take a dump in the middle of main street.  I'm fine with that.  Laws dictating that you cannot commit PDAs?  I am not fine with that as public displays of affection are not going to harm anyone...not mentally or physically.  The question for me then comes down, as I said above, to the degree that I expect someone else to tolerate from me and the degree I will tolerate from others and that decision comes down to many factors...the environment, the community, the type of public experience it is, and on and on and on.

< Message edited by CreativeDominant -- 7/15/2009 7:26:04 AM >

(in reply to NihilusZero)
Profile   Post #: 279
RE: Public BDSM - should we tolerate it? - 7/15/2009 8:44:59 AM   
Bella1965


Posts: 285
Joined: 12/12/2006
From: NYC
Status: offline
G'morning all:


quote:

ORIGINAL: BossyShoeBitch
You think that was pissy? Wow.  Not quite sure where I said anything about your appearance.  But apparently you have a complete lack of understanding of what constitutes sarcasm.  Pity.

Actually, I understand sarcasm quite well. I employ it often. This however is not sarcasm. You viewed my profile in order to make specific disparaging remarks. Here, let me refresh your short term memory loss.
quote:

ORIGINAL: BossyShoeBitch
however, I don't deign to engage this person in any further discussions. I feel certain, after seeing her apt pictures and her clothing, that it is highly unlikely she and I would EVER be dining in the same restaurant anyway. Union Turnpike just ain't my thing.

I've bolded it, just in case your rose colored glasses are on. So, if you consider me so beneath your notice, why do you keep addressing me? Hmm?? The serious lack of control issue you have, I guess. Not a favorable trait in a so-called dominant.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BossyShoeBitch
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bella1965
I do not tolerate screaming brats or public nudity, even for breast feeding.
Seems a bit contradictory.  But maybe that's just me.

I decided to educate myself. I researched the legality of public breast feeding and female breast exposure. Yes, a person can change a stance. It's called adaptability. I would just as vehemently defend that female's right to suckle her offspring as the female that wants to walk down the street topless. Why? Because they're legally protected rights. I don't think either one is in good taste, but I'll be damned if I'd let one more precious, protected right, especially for females, be taken away. This country and in particular, my city and state, is way too fond of that already.

As to children and BDSM? That's the parent's job, not mine or anybody else's. Let them police what their offspring are exposed to. It's their duty and responsibility. Not to say I advocate poor judgment, but I refuse to curtail my rights or anyone else's because parents are too lazy or incompetent to exercise good parenting skills.


Stay safe, play nice, & share your toys w/ others...





Bella

_____________________________

Life shouldn't be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly shouting..."Wow! What a ride!

(in reply to BossyShoeBitch)
Profile   Post #: 280
Page:   <<   < prev  12 13 [14] 15 16   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Public BDSM - should we tolerate it? Page: <<   < prev  12 13 [14] 15 16   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.158