Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Is Elise Sutton right?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Is Elise Sutton right? Page: <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Is Elise Sutton right? - 3/20/2006 1:02:44 PM   
LuckyAlbatross


Posts: 19224
Joined: 10/25/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver
One could write a thesis but no one is going to read a thesis on a thread but to try to be concise, politics tends to be based on selfish interest and like any political theory so is feminism and those women that espouse feminism tend to be interested in their own interests and not the interests in women in general or interested in the interests of women in general as long as it suits their own interests. There is nothing intrinsically wrong with that, selfish interest motivates the majority of us but to put a veneer of idealistic sisterhood on it and putting themselves on a pedestal as though they believe in some higher cause, well nooo!

I will just say that generally, activism is very thankless, hard, non-tangibly rewarding work and people who engage in it consistently are pretty remarkable people.

And I haven't seen anyone here suggest feminism as some idealistic sisterhood or putting anyone on pedastals.

_____________________________

Find stable partners, not a stable of partners.

"Sometimes my whore logic gets all fuzzy"- Californication

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 181
RE: Is Elise Sutton right? - 3/20/2006 2:40:35 PM   
TeeGO


Posts: 451
Joined: 12/11/2005
Status: offline

We are all open minded people here. I just can't figure out why there is so much disagreement pertaining to this topic.

I know Elise Sutton is into Feminism, she thinks it destroys the "dreaded" male ego or something.

I know a lot of the male subs are into this, you can see their pictures with their frilly dresses, make-up, and wigs.

But why are so many male Doms arguing about Feminism, I've never seen or heard of a male Dom into Feminism.

Now I know about 1/2 of the Domme's are into Feminism while 1/2 are not, with the other 1/3 undecided.

As for me, I say live at let live, if you like Feminism then go for it.
Now when I hear talk of Forced-Feminism I start looking for the back door to slip on out of Dodge and...
PSSSSTTTTPSSSTT<<<
 

Huh? What? Oh...um...somebody is trying to get my attention off to the left, excuse me a moment...
>>>>>>>>What do you want?
PSSSPSSSPSPSSP<<<<
>>>>Feminization? What's Feminism?
PSSSPSSSPSPSSP<<<<
>>>>Ooooh! Well that’s different.
 
...Um, what I was saying...uh...
NEVERMIND.

(in reply to LuckyAlbatross)
Profile   Post #: 182
RE: Is Elise Sutton right? - 3/20/2006 3:27:25 PM   
MrDiscipline44


Posts: 1776
Joined: 1/5/2005
Status: offline
LMAO!! Now I've got to admit, that was too funny.

_____________________________

If you love somebody, you have to be willing to break them.

Those who can, do. Those who can't, teach.

Have you slapped your slave today?

(in reply to TeeGO)
Profile   Post #: 183
RE: Is Elise Sutton right? - 3/20/2006 4:56:14 PM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: amayos


quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy
Alright, I just have to ask, what is "the feminist movement?"


An admittedly more subtle yet arguably more persuasive and numerous faction of mindset than the first, the supporters of which constitute radical liberal politicians and their well-meaning and not-so-well-meaning supporters, more than one college curriculum which has often taken on the role of disseminating doctrine and intellectual propaganda on behalf of the aforementioned political body (in the name of equality and 'well-roundedness'), the massive Hollywood and entertainment media femisinformation influence seen virtually everywhere which repeatedly enforces a women rule, men drool satirical—and sometimes not so satirical—content, and (my personal favorite) heady, smarmy intellectuals who contain a ponderous bias in support of liberal feminist politics yet often pretend to pursue "fairness" and "balance" in literary, radio, television or internet-based discourse.

For examples on that last point cloudboy, take a look in the mirror.


Hmm, last point....., you mean I'm your "personal favorite?" I'm touched. O, and I must add, which is not somthing I usually get to say about your posts..... but... when I read that first sentence up there.... my eyes just kind of gloss over. Someday, you'll have to tell me what "faction of mindset" is.

I'm not a big fan of doctrine, but count me in the camp that's glad for women's liberation.

Curious, did you read Ellen Goodman today, "Redefining marital happiness," its as if she's following this Elise Sutton thread herself.

http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2006/03/17/redefining_marital_happiness/

>This month, two sociologists from the University of Virginia, Bradford Wilcox and Steven Nock, published a portrait of happy marriage. Using data from 5,000 couples in the National Survey of Families and Households done in the 1990s, they looked at the wives' views and came up with a model that had something to please both traditionalists and progressives.

To the pleasure of progressives, they found that a husband's emotional engagement is crucial to a wife's happiness. So is her belief that the housework is divided fairly. To the pleasure of traditionalists, they found that women married to breadwinner husbands are happier than full-time working wives. And that wives who believe in marriage till death do us part -- rather than marriage as long as love shall last -- are also happier.<


(in reply to amayos)
Profile   Post #: 184
RE: Is Elise Sutton right? - 3/20/2006 4:57:54 PM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LuckyAlbatross

I will just say that generally, activism is very thankless, hard, non-tangibly rewarding work and people who engage in it consistently are pretty remarkable people.

And I haven't seen anyone here suggest feminism as some idealistic sisterhood or putting anyone on pedastals.


Meatclever's just upset that they're not HIS activists.

I agree with you point here.

(in reply to LuckyAlbatross)
Profile   Post #: 185
RE: Is Elise Sutton right? - 3/20/2006 6:32:45 PM   
Tristan


Posts: 330
Joined: 5/31/2004
Status: offline
Many have written about how they do not understand why some people get angry with feminism.  I think there were many good posts explaining the reasons.  I think that the basic reason is that feminism, in general, promotes a negative attitude toward a particular gender in order to promote a political agenda.  I think it's that simple. 

Feminism is the only movement that can do this too.  If any other movement used negative statements about another group (with the exception of muslims or arabs), they would not get positive media attention.  You can say things about men that you can not say about any other group.  How do people who talk about fairness justify these negative statements and attitudes? 

I think what many who crisized feminism are saying is that they want fairness and balance.  This is what I hear most often as feminism's main critism.  No matter how angry or how many issues you have with the opposite gender, don't forget that you have a 50/50 chance of having children of that gender.  We as a species seem to have a strong desire to divide labor based on gender.  That doesn't mean we still can not have fairness in this division of labor.  However, fairness is not going to happen with the promotion of negative attitudes toward a particular group.

Tristan

(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 186
RE: Is Elise Sutton right? - 3/20/2006 6:37:06 PM   
DiannaVesta


Posts: 1087
Joined: 2/6/2006
From: Mid-Atlantic area
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tristan

Many have written about how they do not understand why some people get angry with feminism.  I think there were many good posts explaining the reasons.  I think that the basic reason is that feminism, in general, promotes a negative attitude toward a particular gender in order to promote a political agenda.  I think it's that simple. 

Feminism is the only movement that can do this too.  If any other movement used negative statements about another group (with the exception of muslims or arabs), they would not get positive media attention.  You can say things about men that you can not say about any other group.  How do people who talk about fairness justify these negative statements and attitudes? 

I think what many who crisized feminism are saying is that they want fairness and balance.  This is what I hear most often as feminism's main critism.  No matter how angry or how many issues you have with the opposite gender, don't forget that you have a 50/50 chance of having children of that gender.  We as a species seem to have a strong desire to divide labor based on gender.  That doesn't mean we still can not have fairness in this division of labor.  However, fairness is not going to happen with the promotion of negative attitudes toward a particular group.

Tristan


Well said.


_____________________________



(in reply to Tristan)
Profile   Post #: 187
RE: Is Elise Sutton right? - 3/20/2006 8:36:24 PM   
thetammyjo


Posts: 6322
Joined: 9/8/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tristan

Feminism is the only movement that can do this too. If any other movement used negative statements about another group (with the exception of muslims or arabs), they would not get positive media attention. You can say things about men that you can not say about any other group. How do people who talk about fairness justify these negative statements and attitudes?



Wow you must live in a very different reality than I then.

Most social movements, in fact I can't think of a single one that does not fit this, say negative things about the opposing views or the opposing arguments -- whether its about race, religion, gender, legal or civil rights, there will always be extreme views in any social movement. That's part of rhetoric in fact (not the best practices in it but still part of it).

To claim that feminism is the only one seems very unrealistic.



< Message edited by thetammyjo -- 3/20/2006 8:38:24 PM >


_____________________________

Love, Peace, Hugs, Kisses, Whips & Chains,

TammyJo

Check out my website at http://www.thetammyjo.com Or www.tammyjoeckhart.com

And my LJ where I post fiction in progress if you "friend" me at http://thetammyjo.livejournal.com/

(in reply to Tristan)
Profile   Post #: 188
RE: Is Elise Sutton right? - 3/20/2006 8:45:10 PM   
amayos


Posts: 1553
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: New England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tristan

Many have written about how they do not understand why some people get angry with feminism.  I think there were many good posts explaining the reasons.  I think that the basic reason is that feminism, in general, promotes a negative attitude toward a particular gender in order to promote a political agenda.  I think it's that simple. 

Feminism is the only movement that can do this too.  If any other movement used negative statements about another group (with the exception of muslims or arabs), they would not get positive media attention.  You can say things about men that you can not say about any other group.  How do people who talk about fairness justify these negative statements and attitudes? 

I think what many who crisized feminism are saying is that they want fairness and balance.  This is what I hear most often as feminism's main critism.  No matter how angry or how many issues you have with the opposite gender, don't forget that you have a 50/50 chance of having children of that gender.  We as a species seem to have a strong desire to divide labor based on gender.  That doesn't mean we still can not have fairness in this division of labor.  However, fairness is not going to happen with the promotion of negative attitudes toward a particular group.

Tristan


Good points, Tristan.

(in reply to Tristan)
Profile   Post #: 189
RE: Is Elise Sutton right? - 3/20/2006 9:02:22 PM   
amayos


Posts: 1553
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: New England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy

Someday, you'll have to tell me what "faction of mindset" is.



Leave my idiosyncratic typing alone! I decide upon a whim if I want to speak cryptically.


Interesting article. Being that the Boston Globe is arguably a news organization with a liberal political influence, I will weigh this link with some degree of...caution.


(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 190
RE: Is Elise Sutton right? - 3/21/2006 12:20:52 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LuckyAlbatross

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver
One could write a thesis but no one is going to read a thesis on a thread but to try to be concise, politics tends to be based on selfish interest and like any political theory so is feminism and those women that espouse feminism tend to be interested in their own interests and not the interests in women in general or interested in the interests of women in general as long as it suits their own interests. There is nothing intrinsically wrong with that, selfish interest motivates the majority of us but to put a veneer of idealistic sisterhood on it and putting themselves on a pedestal as though they believe in some higher cause, well nooo!

I will just say that generally, activism is very thankless, hard, non-tangibly rewarding work and people who engage in it consistently are pretty remarkable people.

And I haven't seen anyone here suggest feminism as some idealistic sisterhood or putting anyone on pedastals.


Hmm many a feminist/misandrist/pissed off bitch has got herself rich and well known by writing a provocative book that if mirrored by a male would be condemned as misogynist..

As for activists being remarkable people, let's think of a few, Osama Bin Laden, Lenin, Moa, Marx....I guess it just depends which side of the fence you are on as to whether someone is remarkable of not.

(in reply to LuckyAlbatross)
Profile   Post #: 191
RE: Is Elise Sutton right? - 3/21/2006 3:17:02 AM   
Tristan


Posts: 330
Joined: 5/31/2004
Status: offline
Thetammyjo,

quote:

Wow you must live in a very different reality than I then.

Most social movements, in fact I can't think of a single one that does not fit this, say negative things about the opposing views or the opposing arguments -- whether its about race, religion, gender, legal or civil rights, there will always be extreme views in any social movement. That's part of rhetoric in fact (not the best practices in it but still part of it).

To claim that feminism is the only one seems very unrealistic.


I did not say other movements did not do this, I just said that other movements, in general, do not get positive media coverage (without alternate views) when they do this.    

I also don't think that people are critizing the extreem views of feminism either.  I think the main critism that I'm hearing is of mainstream feminism.  Feminism is one sided.  Feminism does not look at a study that concludes girls get a better over all education than boys, and suggest changes to the system to help boys get a equal over all education.  They look at that same study and find the specific areas that girls are not equal to boys, and suggest changes that would help girls in those specific areas.  I think this attitude is probably what most people dislike about main stream feminism.

Gender roles are changing.  What is needed is a discussion that is not one sided or hampered with negative statements and attitudes toward one side.

Tristan

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 192
RE: Is Elise Sutton right? - 3/21/2006 5:44:18 AM   
LuckyAlbatross


Posts: 19224
Joined: 10/25/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver
Hmm many a feminist/misandrist/pissed off bitch has got herself rich and well known by writing a provocative book that if mirrored by a male would be condemned as misogynist..

You'll have to define "many."  And I did use the word "generally."  I accept there are and always will be a few exceptions.  That doesn't mean it's the prime motivation for the great many of the activists, nor the end result.
quote:


As for activists being remarkable people, let's think of a few, Osama Bin Laden, Lenin, Moa, Marx....I guess it just depends which side of the fence you are on as to whether someone is remarkable of not.

You're playing the same hyperbole card you tried before and it's just as irrelevant.. 

_____________________________

Find stable partners, not a stable of partners.

"Sometimes my whore logic gets all fuzzy"- Californication

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 193
RE: Is Elise Sutton right? - 3/21/2006 7:01:05 AM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

Hmm many a feminist/misandrist/pissed off bitch has got herself rich and well known by writing a provocative book that if mirrored by a male would be condemned as misogynist..

As for activists being remarkable people, let's think of a few, Osama Bin Laden, Lenin, Moa, Marx....I guess it just depends which side of the fence you are on as to whether someone is remarkable of not.


You are entirely annoying if not completely unfair. The United States was founded on activism and an act of terrorism (The Boston Tea Party.) So don't try to unfairly malign "activists" with that cobbled, self serving, and largely baiting list.

The fact is you don't like "feminists" otherwise you would not equate them with a "pissed off bitch." Its funny, when you try and dress up your own warped bias with "objectivity," your bias/insanity/bigotry only comes forth in more clear relief.

There is absolutely no ejustem generis between feminists and Bin Laden, Lenin, Mao, and Marx. Bin Laden, Mao, and Lenin all had violence rationalized as a core component of their revolutionary program ---- whereas the same could never be said for any leading feminist. Next, 10-1 you've never even read one work by Marx or even his small political pamphlet, The Communist Manifesto. If you had any grip on Marx, whatsoever, you'd realize that Marx was a writer and political philosopher FIRST and that he himself was hardly an activist at all. His renown and influence stems from his critique on unregulated capitalism and his infamy is largely derived from the followers of his writings --- who in substance were much more akin to Lenin.

Your posts are nothing but generalist crap. You don't name names, identify actual cause and effects, or offer any concrete specifics --- why? I would guess it's because you are unable to do it. In fact your whole argument makes about as much sense as your prior statement of, "Poor women always had equal rights because in the part of society they inhabited there wasn't enough wealth to carry passengers."


(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 194
RE: Is Elise Sutton right? - 3/21/2006 7:08:16 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LuckyAlbatross

You're playing the same hyperbole card you tried before and it's just as irrelevant.. 


"All men are rapists and that's all they are" -- Marilyn French, Author, "The Women's Room"

"I feel that 'man-hating' is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them." -- Robin Morgan, MS. Magazine Editor

"I believe that women have a capacity for understanding and compassion which a man structurally does not have, does not have it because he cannot have it. He's just incapable of it." -- Former Congresswoman Barbara Jordan

"I claim that rape exists any time sexual intercourse occurs when it has not been initiated by the woman, out of her own genuine affection and desire." -- Robin Morgan

"Heterosexual intercourse is the pure, formalized expression of contempt for women's bodies." -- Andrea Dworkin

"And if the professional rapist is to be separated from the average dominant heterosexual [male], it may be mainly a quantitative difference." -- Susan Griffin "Rape: The All-American Crime"

"The institution of sexual intercourse is anti-feminist" -- Ti-Grace Atkinson "Amazon Odyssey" (p. 86)

"When a woman reaches orgasm with a man she is only collaborating with the patriarchal system, eroticizing her own oppression..." -- Sheila Jeffrys

In order to raise children with equality, we must take them away from families and communally raise them." (Dr. Mary Jo Bane, feminist and assistant professor of education at Wellesley College and associate director of the school's Center for Research on Woman).

"The simple fact is that every woman must be willing to be identified as a lesbian to be fully feminist." -U.S. National organization for Women Times.

"The end of the institution of marriage is a necessary condition for the liberation of women. Therefore it is important for us to encourage women to leave their husbands..." -Declaration of Feminism

"A good part-and definitely the most fun part-of being a feminist is about frightening men." --Julie Burchill (b. 1960), British journalist, author. Time Out (London, 16 Nov. 1989).

...rape is the perfected act of male sexuality in a patriarchal culture-- it is the ultimate metaphor for domination, violence, subjugation, and possession. -- Robin Morgan

The list is endless.

Osama bin laden is hardly hyperbole. He's a pussy cat!

< Message edited by meatcleaver -- 3/21/2006 7:09:34 AM >

(in reply to LuckyAlbatross)
Profile   Post #: 195
RE: Is Elise Sutton right? - 3/21/2006 7:12:03 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tristan

Many have written about how they do not understand why some people get angry with feminism.  I think there were many good posts explaining the reasons.  I think that the basic reason is that feminism, in general, promotes a negative attitude toward a particular gender in order to promote a political agenda.  I think it's that simple. 

Feminism is the only movement that can do this too.  If any other movement used negative statements about another group (with the exception of muslims or arabs), they would not get positive media attention.  You can say things about men that you can not say about any other group.  How do people who talk about fairness justify these negative statements and attitudes? 

I think what many who crisized feminism are saying is that they want fairness and balance.  This is what I hear most often as feminism's main critism.  No matter how angry or how many issues you have with the opposite gender, don't forget that you have a 50/50 chance of having children of that gender.  We as a species seem to have a strong desire to divide labor based on gender.  That doesn't mean we still can not have fairness in this division of labor.  However, fairness is not going to happen with the promotion of negative attitudes toward a particular group.

Tristan


This hatred of feminism wasnt so much from the men as it was from the majority of the women, who the minority dragged into the feminist way of life against their will.

How many feminists that have been in the news do you know married and had a happy life? family? i can name pages of non feminists who have. 


Feminism, the Noble Lie.

Turnabout

The State Of Feminism Today


here is another good one
Hang Male-Bashing Out to Dry

if you google feminism you can find literally volumes of articles and essays on it and the greater majority talk about the tragic effects that feminism has had on society as a whole.   that was just 3 of them.





< Message edited by Real0ne -- 3/21/2006 7:50:49 AM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Tristan)
Profile   Post #: 196
RE: Is Elise Sutton right? - 3/21/2006 7:42:14 AM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

This hatred of feminism wasnt so much from the men as it was from the majority of the women, who the minority dragged into the feminist way of life against their will.

How many feminists that have been in the news do you know married and had a happy life? family? i can name pages of non feminists who have.



I'll go with Ellen Goodman's rebuttal on this one:

>Well, the change agent in any relationship is likely to produce conflict. As Nock says, ''Whether you are striving for equality in the law or in a relationship, it's going to be a challenge. The question is whether it's worth it."

What if women had never raised expectations? Feminists began pushing men for more openness and family involvement a generation ago. Wilcox acknowledges, ''Men who have taken that message are the men who are most likely to have happy wives."

Progressive women pressed, demanded -- dare I say nagged? -- for the benefits that are now also reaped by more traditional wives. And let's remember how many husbands have already become full and equal partners in their family lives.

We are in the midst of a long and bumpy era of social change where the relationships between men and women are in flux and marriages may change or end. Women who expect equality are not likely to heed the old Archie Bunker line: ''Stifle yourself, Edith." Indeed, women at the demanding, cutting edge may eventually be the ones who reduce the divorce rate rather than raising the unhappiness index.

So the question is not whether women should lower their expectations. It's whether men will kick it up another notch. To the current generation of wives, here's an update on my friend's advice: Speak up, speak up, your daughters' ''semi-traditional" marriages may depend on it.<

http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2006/03/17/redefining_marital_happiness/

quote:

the tragic effects that feminism has had on society as a whole


You have got to be kidding here, right? You act as if feminism has lead to the degradation of our environment, moral values, economic output, and overall public safety. "Tragic effects," LOL, that's a good one. You have taken hyperbole to a whole new level.

< Message edited by cloudboy -- 3/21/2006 7:49:11 AM >

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 197
RE: Is Elise Sutton right? - 3/21/2006 8:26:06 AM   
Lordandmaster


Posts: 10943
Joined: 6/22/2004
Status: offline
Who are all these rich feminists?  I keep asking you for examples, and you keep refusing to provide them.

From what I've seen, women who get rich writing politically oriented books tend to be conservatives.

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

Hmm many a feminist/misandrist/pissed off bitch has got herself rich and well known by writing a provocative book that if mirrored by a male would be condemned as misogynist..

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 198
RE: Is Elise Sutton right? - 3/21/2006 8:45:53 AM   
thetammyjo


Posts: 6322
Joined: 9/8/2005
Status: offline
I think to truly benefit from your quotations you need to note that you've used one person, Robin Morgan, multiple times. Maybe you have a problem with her; I know many feminist who do.

You also need to note whether or not that person is a feminist, what type of feminism she follows, when the statement was made, and in what context.

Otherwise I could cite numerous "Christian" statements that are equally as nasty about women, about minorities, about politics and about other religions and claim all Christians are this way. I'm guessing you wouldn't like that, would you?

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

quote:

ORIGINAL: LuckyAlbatross

You're playing the same hyperbole card you tried before and it's just as irrelevant..


"All men are rapists and that's all they are" -- Marilyn French, Author, "The Women's Room"

"I feel that 'man-hating' is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them." -- Robin Morgan, MS. Magazine Editor

"I believe that women have a capacity for understanding and compassion which a man structurally does not have, does not have it because he cannot have it. He's just incapable of it." -- Former Congresswoman Barbara Jordan

"I claim that rape exists any time sexual intercourse occurs when it has not been initiated by the woman, out of her own genuine affection and desire." -- Robin Morgan

"Heterosexual intercourse is the pure, formalized expression of contempt for women's bodies." -- Andrea Dworkin

"And if the professional rapist is to be separated from the average dominant heterosexual [male], it may be mainly a quantitative difference." -- Susan Griffin "Rape: The All-American Crime"

"The institution of sexual intercourse is anti-feminist" -- Ti-Grace Atkinson "Amazon Odyssey" (p. 86)

"When a woman reaches orgasm with a man she is only collaborating with the patriarchal system, eroticizing her own oppression..." -- Sheila Jeffrys

In order to raise children with equality, we must take them away from families and communally raise them." (Dr. Mary Jo Bane, feminist and assistant professor of education at Wellesley College and associate director of the school's Center for Research on Woman).

"The simple fact is that every woman must be willing to be identified as a lesbian to be fully feminist." -U.S. National organization for Women Times.

"The end of the institution of marriage is a necessary condition for the liberation of women. Therefore it is important for us to encourage women to leave their husbands..." -Declaration of Feminism

"A good part-and definitely the most fun part-of being a feminist is about frightening men." --Julie Burchill (b. 1960), British journalist, author. Time Out (London, 16 Nov. 1989).

...rape is the perfected act of male sexuality in a patriarchal culture-- it is the ultimate metaphor for domination, violence, subjugation, and possession. -- Robin Morgan

The list is endless.

Osama bin laden is hardly hyperbole. He's a pussy cat!


_____________________________

Love, Peace, Hugs, Kisses, Whips & Chains,

TammyJo

Check out my website at http://www.thetammyjo.com Or www.tammyjoeckhart.com

And my LJ where I post fiction in progress if you "friend" me at http://thetammyjo.livejournal.com/

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 199
RE: Is Elise Sutton right? - 3/21/2006 9:28:38 AM   
amayos


Posts: 1553
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: New England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thetammyjo

Otherwise I could cite numerous "Christian" statements that are equally as nasty about women, about minorities, about politics and about other religions and claim all Christians are this way.



I know I will never forget Jerry Falwell stating how the attack on the world trade center was essentially God's punishment for it being ungodly.

(in reply to thetammyjo)
Profile   Post #: 200
Page:   <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Is Elise Sutton right? Page: <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.086