Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Is the media abandoning Obama?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Is the media abandoning Obama? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Is the media abandoning Obama? - 9/22/2009 10:01:34 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tnai

You got to take it all with a grain of salt, but I think the best work on the media basis in a long time has was done my Orson Scott Card of Ender's Game fame, and he is very liberal.  These are reprints of a column he does for his local paper.

http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110005312
http://www.ldsmag.com/ideas/081017light.html



Yes, I can see "he is very liberal".

It's just that he is a self-hating liberal and apparently hates all other liberals as well.

And by the way, you do know the Wall Street Journal and Fox News are under the same ownership, so an editorial in the WSJ defending Fox is hardly credible.

(in reply to tnai)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Is the media abandoning Obama? - 9/22/2009 10:18:20 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth

quote:

The inconsistency is the fact we have been hearing for years about liberal media bias, yet the fact is the so-called liberal media will criticize Obama as readily as they criticized Bush.
I said they ARE being consistent. They are criticizing Obama because he doesn't seem to be having any success meeting their expectations. He seems unable to fulfill their liberal agenda, ergo the criticism.

quote:

Can you say the same of Fox?

And by the way, didn't you just recently say you never watch Fox? Interesting how you know they are consistent.
No I can't, especially if you are now saying they haven't been. I rely on the integrity of your representation, is that incorrect? I have to rely on your monitoring.

Based upon what you have been saying, FOX has been criticizing them because he IS trying. Their agenda is to not let him succeed. Both produce criticism, albeit with differing intent.

It's not really that complicated.


Yes it is complicated.

Somewhere along the line, certain media sources with an agenda began to convince a large portion of the country that the rest of the media was biased by pandering to the biases of those they were convincing.

And I truly believe that it is the media, primarily Fox and conservative radio and websites that are creating the deep divide in this country by exploiting people's unfounded fears for their own monetary benefit.

(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Is the media abandoning Obama? - 9/22/2009 10:55:35 PM   
tnai


Posts: 29
Joined: 9/6/2009
Status: offline
'Blatantly' and 'honestly' are two different words. Fox is more open about there bias but if anything I feel they are slightly less bias, they at least have liberals working for them and getting air time something I see very little of on the other networks.

(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Is the media abandoning Obama? - 9/22/2009 11:41:10 PM   
tnai


Posts: 29
Joined: 9/6/2009
Status: offline
Even if true that he hates himself and all other liberals, a point I in no way agree as being correct, how does that affect my point that I feel he does a good job of describing the situation? Even if the companies which reprinted his article from the first print for the reason of showing the company they belong to are solid news companies how does that affect my point as well? Someone disliking other members of a group they are a member of or being printed by those who have a interest in him being correct are not evidence of them being incorrect. And although Rupert Murdoch does own both Fox New and The WSJ he does not to the best of my knowledge own or have any interest in the Rhinoceros Times in Greensboro, North Carolina which is the paper that first published both of these articles as far as I know.  The Rhinoceros Times is owned by John and William Hammer. As I understand it the Wall Street Journal reprinted his article because it is a third party supporting that there company is correct that other news outlets have a liberal bias. And even if I have missed a fact how does who paid who to write what show the article is incorrect?

My point is, and has been that the basic question behind this thread is a sad reflection on the media.  My evidence is that almost all of the media is very biased, mostly for the President and the liberals, a small section to stop them. I've presented someone I consider a better writer then myself who with a very different world view and set of evidence came to same idea - that American media on the whole can't be trusted. You've done a fine job of showing that Fox news is flawed, something I freely admit too. Beyond that what exactly are are you getting at as it relates to the topic this thread is on?

(in reply to tnai)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Is the media abandoning Obama? - 9/23/2009 4:32:27 AM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth

quote:

The inconsistency is the fact we have been hearing for years about liberal media bias, yet the fact is the so-called liberal media will criticize Obama as readily as they criticized Bush.
I said they ARE being consistent. They are criticizing Obama because he doesn't seem to be having any success meeting their expectations. He seems unable to fulfill their liberal agenda, ergo the criticism.

quote:

Can you say the same of Fox?

And by the way, didn't you just recently say you never watch Fox? Interesting how you know they are consistent.
No I can't, especially if you are now saying they haven't been. I rely on the integrity of your representation, is that incorrect? I have to rely on your monitoring.

Based upon what you have been saying, FOX has been criticizing them because he IS trying. Their agenda is to not let him succeed. Both produce criticism, albeit with differing intent.

It's not really that complicated.

Spot on, Merc.

Firm

_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Is the media abandoning Obama? - 9/23/2009 10:55:25 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

Here you go Firm, this is right on topic:


quote:

In a somewhat schizophrenic report on Tuesday’s CBS Evening News, White House correspondent Chip Reid proclaimed President Obama is: "still the darling of the international community. Warmly welcomed by a world that grew weary of President Bush’s brash go-it-alone style." But also admitted: "But with scant progress on a long his of issues, the question now is what does he have to show for it?"

Anchor Katie Couric opened the segment by asking Reid: "Can the President be anything other than the center of attention? Can he do more with that?" Reid replied: "He sure would like to be, Katie. You know, at every international summit he has attended he has been the most popular person in the room. But now many people are asking what good is popularity if it doesn’t lead to concrete results?" 

After denouncing President Bush’s "brash style," Reid praised Obama for his "sharp departure" which " has recommitted the United States to working with the U.N. and engaging the world."


http://newsbusters.org/blogs/kyle-drennen/2009/09/23/cbs-obama-international-darling-hasn-t-accomplished-anything


Fascinating stuff.


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Is the media abandoning Obama? - 9/23/2009 11:00:07 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

And here's another one:

quote:

ABC Notices Obama Administration's Effort to Suppress Criticism of ObamaCare


Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell's decision to go to the Senate floor on Tuesday to call out the Obama administration for using the full power of a federal regulatory agency to suppress free speech -- specifically, to silence Humana's predictions about the impact of proposed ObamaCare cuts to the Medicare Advantage program -- led ABC, but not CBS or NBC, to air a story on the “gag order.”   


ABC's story began with a McConnell soundbite (“'Shut up,' the government says, 'don't communicate with your customers. Be quiet and get in line,'”), before reporter Jonathan Karl explained McConnell was referring to the “Department of Health and Human Services, telling insurance companies who serve Medicare recipients, to stop 'misleading' and 'confusing' mailings, saying, quote: 'We are instructing you to immediately discontinue all such mailings, and remove any related materials from your Web sites.'”

Karl continued: “The extraordinary order comes in response to a mailing the Humana insurance company sent to customers in the Medicare Advantage program. The Humana mailing warned that because of Medicare cuts in the health care reform bills, quote, 'millions of seniors and disabled individuals could lose many important benefits and services.'”


http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brent-baker/2009/09/23/abc-notices-obama-administrations-effort-suppress-criticism-obamacare



_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Is the media abandoning Obama? - 9/23/2009 11:03:50 AM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
I see... you post two links from Newsbusters, which is an extension of the Media Research Center ("dedicated to exposing liberal media bias" an arguable premise at best)... but of course, your sources aren't slanted and biased at all  .

_____________________________



(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Is the media abandoning Obama? - 9/23/2009 11:09:39 AM   
Arrogance


Posts: 185
Joined: 7/29/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

I see... you post two links from Newsbusters, which is an extension of the Media Research Center ("dedicated to exposing liberal media bias" an arguable premise at best)... but of course, your sources aren't slanted and biased at all  .


Nope nope!

It's all just really really "Fascinating stuff!"

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Is the media abandoning Obama? - 9/23/2009 11:17:28 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

Every source is biased kitten, bias is unavoidable when discussing any given topic. What's cool about Newsbusters is that there are transcripts available of whatever is being discussed there, and there is often video.

The other day someone posted a clip of CNN's mark Sanchez railing against Fox News. I imagine there was some bias there, as well. I didn't complain though, because again, its very difficult to discuss any story without having input from some source for basic information, and it can't always be something from the Huffington Post.

You have to mix it up a little. Variety is the spice of life.

Edited to add the little winky thingy


< Message edited by Sanity -- 9/23/2009 11:21:13 AM >


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Is the media abandoning Obama? - 9/23/2009 11:45:14 AM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arrogance

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

I see... you post two links from Newsbusters, which is an extension of the Media Research Center ("dedicated to exposing liberal media bias" an arguable premise at best)... but of course, your sources aren't slanted and biased at all  .


Nope nope!

It's all just really really "Fascinating stuff!"


Sanity is correct.

Sources are especially important when it comes to how something is protrayed, and how the facts are presented (or in the question of whether any such "facts" exist).

However, when the facts are available from other sources, or when they are presented with sufficient information so that a reader can form their own opinion, then that is exactly what such a reader should do.

However, some people, when they do not like the conclusions from the source, immediately attempt to throw out the facts, not just the interpretation of the facts.

For example, neither you nor kittn have made any attempt to determine if Kate Couric and Chip Reid actually said what was reported, and whether or not ABC News actually reported what was in the "biased" source.

A person does this for one of four reasons:

1. They don't know any better,
2. They are intentionally attempting to dishonestly influence the discussion, and can't do it based on the facts,
3. They are truly convinced that the actual facts aren't important.
4. They get so excited (or frustrated, or otherwise emotional involved) with the discussion and the conclusions that rationality is no longer their primary means of interpretation or communication.

It could even be a combination, but I'll leave it up to others to form their own conclusions about why any one person might attempt to use fallacious arguments in any particular case.

It just needs to be pointed out from time to time, as it is something we are all guilty of doing, even with the best intentions.

Firm

_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to Arrogance)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Is the media abandoning Obama? - 9/23/2009 11:59:27 AM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

Every source is biased kitten, bias is unavoidable when discussing any given topic.



I'm sure that even you see the irony of posting something from the Media Research Center trying to demonstrate there is a libbias in the media, on a thread that argues the media isn't liberal nor Obama biased after all.

Ever read Catch 22 (Joseph Heller)? It's a classic of American literature. It exposes precisely the kind of crazy thinking that's being demonstrated by the OP, as well as yourself, on this thread. (You're lucky you're so cute  .)

_____________________________



(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Is the media abandoning Obama? - 9/23/2009 12:01:56 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

Who is better equipped to uncover liberal media bias than Newsbusters.

Who else ya gonna call.


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Is the media abandoning Obama? - 9/23/2009 12:06:35 PM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
I don't know: Bullshitbusters?

_____________________________



(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Is the media abandoning Obama? - 9/23/2009 5:59:58 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

rationality is no longer their primary means of interpretation or communication.




That is incredibly optimistic and generous of you, Firm. 

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Is the media abandoning Obama? - 9/23/2009 6:20:03 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

rationality is no longer their primary means of interpretation or communication.




That is incredibly optimistic and generous of you, Firm. 

I'm trying really hard to stay off my favorite mod's radar.

Firm

_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Is the media abandoning Obama? - 9/24/2009 9:20:35 AM   
ETIEOKWE


Posts: 1
Joined: 9/24/2009
Status: offline
I DON'T THINK SO BUT IT IS JUST THAT HIS GOVERNMENT IS EXPERIENCING WHAT OTHERS HAVE BEEN EXPERIENCING.SO HIS OWN CASE WILL NOT BE DIFFERENT.THANKS AND AMERICANS SHOULD CONTINUE TO PRAY FOR OBAMA'S ADMINISTRATION TO SUCCEED AND NOT TO FAIL. FROM JOHN,NIGERIA.

(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Is the media abandoning Obama? - 9/25/2009 10:26:45 PM   
Esinn


Posts: 886
Joined: 6/23/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

The day after Obama was elected, Chris Mathews said on his show that it was his job to see that the Obama administration was a success. No bias there.


Therefore the media is bias, Obama is a socialist and hates old people.


_____________________________

Let's break the law

(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Is the media abandoning Obama? - 9/26/2009 6:35:10 AM   
servantforuse


Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline
I believe that all of the above are true indeed except hating old people. He will offer an early way out for them to save money elsewhere.

(in reply to Esinn)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Is the media abandoning Obama? - 9/26/2009 11:55:40 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
FR:

the British Empire- (crown) is abandoning him.   In fact a faction of the CIA tried to assassinate him a few weeks ago.  The crown is dumping him because he is a non-performing assest.   Even tho he is a puppet- he has not crammed down all the laws they want before the total collapse.

(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Is the media abandoning Obama? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.188