RE: what is TPE 24/7? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


DavanKael -> RE: what is TPE 24/7? (9/28/2009 10:58:25 PM)

I don't really care what genitalia you posess, Lucienne: you, as human being are off-putting. 
It's not the disagreement that is the issue: that you have not taken responsibility for learning to civilly state disagreement is the issue.  Additionally, that you would compliment a man out of one side of your mouth and insult him out of the other: telling.  Stop hi-jacking threads, c-mail me if you wish to discuss this further and if you can't behave yourself there, I'll block you. 
OP: As I said, take a look around, you'll see what's worth paying attention to and what isn't  ;> The person whose post I am defending is one of the few people I have spoken with at length involved with power-dyamic-based relationships who understands the progression to and potentials as well as responsibilities of TPE and 24/7. 
Davan






Elipsis -> RE: what is TPE 24/7? (9/28/2009 11:14:40 PM)

Of all threads I would not have predicted a battle in this one.




ranja -> RE: what is TPE 24/7? (9/29/2009 3:02:14 AM)

Jeff must be busy ordering Carol about or he could surely speak for himself?
... because it would be nice to read his reply...

24-7 TPE is sort of what my Husband and i have too... always had really, i might ask for things but the decision is always His
Kink didn't come into it till two years ago and i do not identify as a slave really... i just feel submissive.
i think it might be a way of life, but at the same time it is just a game and everybody makes their own rules




daintydimples -> RE: what is TPE 24/7? (9/29/2009 5:23:22 AM)

I have said this before: TPE is a mindset.

I liken it to an administrative assistant's relationship to her boss. A good boss will delegate responsibility to her; he will gather input from her. But in the end, the boss makes the decisions and the admin asst backs them up, whether she agrees with them or not.

The only difference in a TPE is that the people choose to enter this type of relationship. It's not role play, it's actually accepting someone as your "boss."










Lucienne -> RE: what is TPE 24/7? (9/29/2009 6:45:05 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DavanKael

I don't really care what genitalia you posess, Lucienne: you, as human being are off-putting. 
It's not the disagreement that is the issue: that you have not taken responsibility for learning to civilly state disagreement is the issue.  Additionally, that you would compliment a man out of one side of your mouth and insult him out of the other: telling.  Stop hi-jacking threads, c-mail me if you wish to discuss this further and if you can't behave yourself there, I'll block you. 


Yeah... I'm not really interested in your passive aggressive mean girl advice. And the fact that you're acknowledging you're not even trying to address my substantive points, that you favor personalizing the issue and chastising, means you're the one hijacking the thread. Not me.

Reviewing my posts, I think it's pretty clear that what I object to is the "literally" part. Jeff may be the go to guy for explaining TPE 24/7. But from his first attempt to do so in this thread, I'm guessing my knowledge of the history of slavery and legal treatment of human beings as chattel is far deeper than his. "Literally" owning slaves is not something that decent human beings do in our culture. I'm not saying he's not a decent human being. I'm saying he doesn't "literally" own Carol.

Given that hundreds of thousands of women (and children) are forced against their will into the sex slave trade, the "literally" distinction is far from academic. Also, given that there are probably people reading these forums who have a rough notion of "consent," I think it's a distinction worth maintaining.




daddysprop247 -> RE: what is TPE 24/7? (9/29/2009 7:14:46 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne

[
Credibility. Ha. Claiming he "literally" owns Carol is like attending a hunger banquet and claiming you have personally suffered third world poverty. I am not insulting or judging his relationship. I am taking offense at his attempt to project his role-playing onto the entire world. Despite the best efforts of some people, slavery hasn't been redefined in the real world as a pretense among consenting adults. To misrepresent it as such is deluded and/or dishonest. You can fancy yourself the Master of a slave without ignoring the reality that people really do suffer involuntary servitude (sexual and otherwise) and what you are doing is not the same thing.





they are the same in that they are both slavery. slavery is not and never has been defined by consent. true, there are plenty of those who simply "get off" on the fantasy and roleplay of M/s, but there are others who recognize the beauty and peace that can be found within slavery, consensual slavery, and that is absolutely real.

i do not really care for the term "TPE 24/7"...too p.c. and just plain not really accurate as far as my life is concerned. but i am someone's property, living with them and owned by them "24/7." to be a slave is to have one's life entirely under the control of another, to be entirely subject to that person's will. i am a slave, and the fact that i made the choice to be a slave 9 years ago does not make it any less so. and unlike some others, we do not really believe in "ongoing consent." i gave my consent once, my consent to be property. after that my consent is a moot point because i am no longer a free person. and it's that very lack of power and external freedom that allows me to live in peace and feel truly free.





antipode -> RE: what is TPE 24/7? (9/29/2009 7:28:16 AM)

quote:

?


yes




Lucienne -> RE: what is TPE 24/7? (9/29/2009 7:48:23 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: daddysprop247

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne

[
Credibility. Ha. Claiming he "literally" owns Carol is like attending a hunger banquet and claiming you have personally suffered third world poverty. I am not insulting or judging his relationship. I am taking offense at his attempt to project his role-playing onto the entire world. Despite the best efforts of some people, slavery hasn't been redefined in the real world as a pretense among consenting adults. To misrepresent it as such is deluded and/or dishonest. You can fancy yourself the Master of a slave without ignoring the reality that people really do suffer involuntary servitude (sexual and otherwise) and what you are doing is not the same thing.





they are the same in that they are both slavery. slavery is not and never has been defined by consent. true, there are plenty of those who simply "get off" on the fantasy and roleplay of M/s, but there are others who recognize the beauty and peace that can be found within slavery, consensual slavery, and that is absolutely real.

i do not really care for the term "TPE 24/7"...too p.c. and just plain not really accurate as far as my life is concerned. but i am someone's property, living with them and owned by them "24/7." to be a slave is to have one's life entirely under the control of another, to be entirely subject to that person's will. i am a slave, and the fact that i made the choice to be a slave 9 years ago does not make it any less so. and unlike some others, we do not really believe in "ongoing consent." i gave my consent once, my consent to be property. after that my consent is a moot point because i am no longer a free person. and it's that very lack of power and external freedom that allows me to live in peace and feel truly free.




I'm not denying the reality of the beauty and peace that you experience. I'm asking others not to deny the ugly and sad reality of those who are "literally" slaves. It seems that you agree that literal slavery does not involve consent. I don't pretend to understand why people are so taken with the language of slavery. The experiences they describe seem more akin to religious orders to me. I guess Ignatius of Loyola was an uber-Dom.




daddysprop247 -> RE: what is TPE 24/7? (9/29/2009 8:21:45 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne

they are the same in that they are both slavery. slavery is not and never has been defined by consent.


I'm not denying the reality of the beauty and peace that you experience. I'm asking others not to deny the ugly and sad reality of those who are "literally" slaves. It seems that you agree that literal slavery does not involve consent. I don't pretend to understand why people are so taken with the language of slavery.



no, we do not agree. i pointed out the fact that slavery is not defined by consent, not that slavery does not involve consent.

slave, as defined by dictionary.com: 1. a person who is the property of and wholly subject to another; a bond servant. 2. a person entirely under the domination of some influence or person
notice there is nothing about being taken or forced against one's will. that is simply the popular/mainstream connotation of slavery, not the definition of it. one can consent to be a slave, and one can be taken as slave against their will. both are equally slaves, as both are entirely controlled and dominated by another.






leadership527 -> RE: what is TPE 24/7? (9/29/2009 8:47:43 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ranja
Jeff must be busy ordering Carol about or he could surely speak for himself?
... because it would be nice to read his reply...
*laughs* Jeff was busy sleeping while all this excitement was happening. My response to all of this is to ignore it. Seriously, what good can come of name-calling on the internet with strangers? I'm choosing not to wallow around in the muck. Lucienne is entitled to his opinion of me.




AnimusRex -> RE: what is TPE 24/7? (9/29/2009 8:51:33 AM)

Sidestepping the argument-

A lot of very good replies here- ranja and daintydimples especially capture what 24/7 TPE means to kim and I. Although we are pretty low on the kink-o-meter, and kim is empowered to make her own decisions about many things, in the end I have the final say.

In reply to the OP, you will find like most BDSM things, how TPE 24/7 is practiced is all over the map- there are as many ways of practicing it as their are people.

The only correctr way, of course, is mine, but I am magnanimous and tolerant enough not to point that out.




Mercnbeth -> RE: what is TPE 24/7? (9/29/2009 9:09:15 AM)

quote:

...one can consent to be a slave, and one can be taken as slave against their will. both are equally slaves, as both are entirely controlled and dominated by another...


well said prop!!![:)]
 
to the OP:
 
for us, it means that we are committed to one another as Master and slave, all the time.  it is by no means an absolute...just the way we view it.




IronBear -> RE: what is TPE 24/7? (9/29/2009 9:20:05 AM)

Ughhh wrong thread




Lucienne -> RE: what is TPE 24/7? (9/29/2009 3:00:25 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: leadership527

quote:

ORIGINAL: ranja
Jeff must be busy ordering Carol about or he could surely speak for himself?
... because it would be nice to read his reply...
*laughs* Jeff was busy sleeping while all this excitement was happening. My response to all of this is to ignore it. Seriously, what good can come of name-calling on the internet with strangers? I'm choosing not to wallow around in the muck. Lucienne is entitled to his opinion of me.


The muck = assertion of fundamental human rights? I think you put yourself in the muck by claiming literal ownership of another human being and I offered you a garden hose. You've chosen to ignore the opportunity to defend your "very simple" argument and hide behind the skirt of Davan as she reaches for the smelling salts on your behalf. Weak.






lovingpet -> RE: what is TPE 24/7? (9/29/2009 3:31:41 PM)

We really do get it Lucienne.  I swear.  We do.  It's NOT the same thing in that there was initial consent.  Beyond that, everything becomes murky because some actually do consent to being hit with an iron weight or whatever other "horrific" thing you wish to throw out there.  Though not a legal transaction, some actually are bought and sold for money and goods.  Some actually do endure what would be realistically considered real life rape simply because that internal enslavement others have discussed has gone so deep that they really don't see the way out anymore.  Some do very sincerely suffer at the hands of their dominant party and not all as consentual as you are liking to paint it, but in the end it is what they knew they were signing up for.  I will admit these cases tend to be few and far between, but they are real and suck a lot of air out of this whole argument.

This simple matter of initial consent is a dividing line, I suppose, between "real" slavery and so called roleplaying.  Sure you have a point.  It's not the SAME thing, but it is far from being so different as to be laughably dismissed as mere fantasy either.  I have a long history of fighting for human rights in a great many ways and I don't even begin to accept the idea the legal practice of slavery is a pretty picture.  The true investment to gain a slave is minimal and they are equally disposable, unlike the value placed on the possessions who post on these boards.  I have witnessed many of the things for which I fight so passionately first hand.  I will never discount the suffering that goes on, but I will also not for a minute say that the mindset and potential conditions of a "consentual" slave cannot mirror the condition of nonconsentual slavery either.  I don't think it waters down anything to recognize the parallels. 

Back to the subject at hand, I will attempt to put it simply (since that has worked out so well up to this point LOL).  I am his and obediently serving him at all times as he requires no matter what he might desire.  He may choose to exercise some, none, or all of that "total" control he has over me, but in the end, it is his regardless of what he does with it.

lovingpet




ncbabe -> RE: what is TPE 24/7? (9/29/2009 4:18:55 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne

quote:

ORIGINAL: leadership527

quote:

ORIGINAL: ranja
Jeff must be busy ordering Carol about or he could surely speak for himself?
... because it would be nice to read his reply...
*laughs* Jeff was busy sleeping while all this excitement was happening. My response to all of this is to ignore it. Seriously, what good can come of name-calling on the internet with strangers? I'm choosing not to wallow around in the muck. Lucienne is entitled to his opinion of me.


The muck = assertion of fundamental human rights? I think you put yourself in the muck by claiming literal ownership of another human being and I offered you a garden hose. You've chosen to ignore the opportunity to defend your "very simple" argument and hide behind the skirt of Davan as she reaches for the smelling salts on your behalf. Weak.





Read his post again. The muck = name calling on the internet with strangers. Which Jeff is refusing to do and you, once again, have chosen to partake in.




Lucienne -> RE: what is TPE 24/7? (9/29/2009 5:20:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovingpet

We really do get it Lucienne.  I swear.  We do.  It's NOT the same thing in that there was initial consent.  Beyond that, everything becomes murky because some actually do consent to being hit with an iron weight or whatever other "horrific" thing you wish to throw out there.  Though not a legal transaction, some actually are bought and sold for money and goods.  Some actually do endure what would be realistically considered real life rape simply because that internal enslavement others have discussed has gone so deep that they really don't see the way out anymore.  Some do very sincerely suffer at the hands of their dominant party and not all as consentual as you are liking to paint it, but in the end it is what they knew they were signing up for.  I will admit these cases tend to be few and far between, but they are real and suck a lot of air out of this whole argument.

This simple matter of initial consent is a dividing line, I suppose, between "real" slavery and so called roleplaying.  Sure you have a point.  It's not the SAME thing, but it is far from being so different as to be laughably dismissed as mere fantasy either.  I have a long history of fighting for human rights in a great many ways and I don't even begin to accept the idea the legal practice of slavery is a pretty picture.  The true investment to gain a slave is minimal and they are equally disposable, unlike the value placed on the possessions who post on these boards.  I have witnessed many of the things for which I fight so passionately first hand.  I will never discount the suffering that goes on, but I will also not for a minute say that the mindset and potential conditions of a "consentual" slave cannot mirror the condition of nonconsentual slavery either.  I don't think it waters down anything to recognize the parallels. 

Back to the subject at hand, I will attempt to put it simply (since that has worked out so well up to this point LOL).  I am his and obediently serving him at all times as he requires no matter what he might desire.  He may choose to exercise some, none, or all of that "total" control he has over me, but in the end, it is his regardless of what he does with it.

lovingpet


Thank you for the response, lovingpet. I know that many people get it. I'm not holding the entire forum responsible for others being unwilling to support their arguments.

I don't think it waters things down to recognize potential parallels between consensual and non-consensual servitude. But I think those parallels would be made on a case by case basis. And in Jeff's case, I do find it laughable to suggest that Carol shares much in common with some poor Ukrainian woman who came to the country expecting to be working as a domestic only to be privately imprisoned and whored out for cash. I find it ironic that my position-- premised on the idea that Jeff is a man who values and loves his wife, a premise based on numerous posts of his that I've read-- is perceived by some as an insult or an attack.




Lucienne -> RE: what is TPE 24/7? (9/29/2009 5:25:21 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ncbabe
Read his post again. The muck = name calling on the internet with strangers. Which Jeff is refusing to do and you, once again, have chosen to partake in.


At a certain point, long since passed, the hyper-sensitivity, earnestness, and defensive maneuvers are just comical. Your presence in the skirt brigade is duly noted.




leadership527 -> RE: what is TPE 24/7? (9/29/2009 6:18:40 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne
At a certain point, long since passed, the hyper-sensitivity, earnestness, and defensive maneuvers are just comical. Your presence in the skirt brigade is duly noted.
*sighs* the sad thing here, Lucienne, is that ncbabe isn't even anyone I know... she's not some fan of mine or anything.

What exactly is it your looking for Lucienne? I get it that your definition of "slave" and mine don't match. I get it that by your definition, Carol is not a slave. I get it that for reasons I do not understand, you feel that somehow 24x7, TPE is better than other alternatives (or, at a minimum, you must think that I believe that). I get it that because of that, you feel that I am posturing. All of this is perfectly understandable. Given that I'm not a linguist or a historian, I'm not prepared to say that you are absolutely wrong in any of those assertions except for the bit about 24x7 being superior.

The reason I'm not defending my argument is because it wasn't an argument and there's nothing to defend. It's just how Carol and I see our marriage. There is no debate here. There's no winner or loser.

daddysprop
I totally agree although I'd add that the dictionary definition still wants to toss in those absolute words like "totally". At least in the digging I was able to do, I was unable to find any slave culture anywhere that placed no bounds whatsoever on what the owner can do. Seems like even in "real slavery", limits exist, at least on paper. It was actually quite interesting to read what rights and protections accrued to various types of slaves in various cultures and different time periods.

And, as a general aside, totally unsupported by any scientific research at all, I'm going to make a wild guess and say that I'm not the first male ever in the history of mankind to fall in love with a woman kneeling at his feet... legally enforced slavery or no.




lovingpet -> RE: what is TPE 24/7? (9/29/2009 6:24:46 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucienne

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovingpet

We really do get it Lucienne.  I swear.  We do.  It's NOT the same thing in that there was initial consent.  Beyond that, everything becomes murky because some actually do consent to being hit with an iron weight or whatever other "horrific" thing you wish to throw out there.  Though not a legal transaction, some actually are bought and sold for money and goods.  Some actually do endure what would be realistically considered real life rape simply because that internal enslavement others have discussed has gone so deep that they really don't see the way out anymore.  Some do very sincerely suffer at the hands of their dominant party and not all as consentual as you are liking to paint it, but in the end it is what they knew they were signing up for.  I will admit these cases tend to be few and far between, but they are real and suck a lot of air out of this whole argument.

This simple matter of initial consent is a dividing line, I suppose, between "real" slavery and so called roleplaying.  Sure you have a point.  It's not the SAME thing, but it is far from being so different as to be laughably dismissed as mere fantasy either.  I have a long history of fighting for human rights in a great many ways and I don't even begin to accept the idea the legal practice of slavery is a pretty picture.  The true investment to gain a slave is minimal and they are equally disposable, unlike the value placed on the possessions who post on these boards.  I have witnessed many of the things for which I fight so passionately first hand.  I will never discount the suffering that goes on, but I will also not for a minute say that the mindset and potential conditions of a "consentual" slave cannot mirror the condition of nonconsentual slavery either.  I don't think it waters down anything to recognize the parallels. 

Back to the subject at hand, I will attempt to put it simply (since that has worked out so well up to this point LOL).  I am his and obediently serving him at all times as he requires no matter what he might desire.  He may choose to exercise some, none, or all of that "total" control he has over me, but in the end, it is his regardless of what he does with it.

lovingpet


Thank you for the response, lovingpet. I know that many people get it. I'm not holding the entire forum responsible for others being unwilling to support their arguments.

I don't think it waters things down to recognize potential parallels between consensual and non-consensual servitude. But I think those parallels would be made on a case by case basis. And in Jeff's case, I do find it laughable to suggest that Carol shares much in common with some poor Ukrainian woman who came to the country expecting to be working as a domestic only to be privately imprisoned and whored out for cash. I find it ironic that my position-- premised on the idea that Jeff is a man who values and loves his wife, a premise based on numerous posts of his that I've read-- is perceived by some as an insult or an attack.



This is an interesting statement for me.  I have talked before about how I wound up so far off the mark of where I thought I was heading that some people would actually state that I have been grossly violated.  The fact is that, yes, I have.  I should be scratching and clawing my way as far away from my partner as I can manage!  This is so completely NOT what I signed up for!  He has simply and unceremoniously ripped through my very HARD limits with complete disregard for anything I would have thought or felt on the matter!  He's a bastard!

As much as it would thrill some folks to see me get my hide tanned for what I just said, he would completely agree with it all and smile.  The fact is that a very similar mental change occured in me that keeps the slave woman in your example from running away.  I've grown to love my captor and accept both my own condition and his expectations, moods, and schedules.  This is just how it is.  I have actually had people urge me that I don't have to go this way and that I could have all these needs of mine met by someone else that would "respect" me.  Still there is no motivation to go even when the way of escape is wide open to me and I am fully aware of it.  Call it a form of Stockholm syndrome if you will, but his hand is more or less inescapable for me now.

All of this hideousness being said, my partner loves, respects, and values me.  He demonstrates that by placing me in such a state.  I am not sure if Carol would see it the way I do, but I came in with some very definite ideas of how the whole thing would go.  As time has gone on, my playbook has long since been thrown out and yet I am unable to get my righteous indignation up and walk away. His plan for me is all too fitting for me as much as I may not like it at times.  He knows me too well and, in so doing, controls me to a level that leaves me not wanting or even knowing how to walk away.  I can't believe I ever fell for his tripe!  Strangely enough, I'm glad I did.

lovingpet





Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.1015625