Lucienne -> RE: what is TPE 24/7? (9/29/2009 6:49:18 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: leadership527 quote:
ORIGINAL: Lucienne At a certain point, long since passed, the hyper-sensitivity, earnestness, and defensive maneuvers are just comical. Your presence in the skirt brigade is duly noted. *sighs* the sad thing here, Lucienne, is that ncbabe isn't even anyone I know... she's not some fan of mine or anything. What exactly is it your looking for Lucienne? I get it that your definition of "slave" and mine don't match. I get it that by your definition, Carol is not a slave. I get it that for reasons I do not understand, you feel that somehow 24x7, TPE is better than other alternatives (or, at a minimum, you must think that I believe that). I get it that because of that, you feel that I am posturing. All of this is perfectly understandable. Given that I'm not a linguist or a historian, I'm not prepared to say that you are absolutely wrong in any of those assertions except for the bit about 24x7 being superior. The reason I'm not defending my argument is because it wasn't an argument and there's nothing to defend. It's just how Carol and I see our marriage. There is no debate here. There's no winner or loser. I thought I was pretty explicit in asking that people not deny the ugly and sad reality of the sex slave trade by equating it to their mutually satisfactory and consensual intimate relationships. I'm not hiding the ball here. When you're defining your relationship in general terms that push semantic drift, you're not just talking about yourself, you're implicating the lives of others. I'm not sure what you mean by me thinking that TPE 24/7 being superior. In terms of nomenclature? I'm agnostic. I'm less concerned with how you label what it is you do than I am with previously existing labels being co-opted to the detriment of those who suffer them in silence. Hence, my objection to "literally." In short, it's not about you, or any of the people posting here about how delighted they are with their "slave" status. My original response to you was motivated by sensitivity for the people whose manner of existence I assume you would never subject your wife to.
|
|
|
|