Tristan
Posts: 330
Joined: 5/31/2004 Status: offline
|
Speaking of generalizations, lawyers are consultants. They get paid only when they have a client, and only when they are providing a service for that client. As with all consultants, it becomes very easy to recommend a course of action that will prolong the length of your service (and increase your fees) regardless of whether it's in your client's best interest. Lawyers have house and car payments. Some even have vacation homes. Someone has to pay for these things, right? lol. Based on my experience, it's far more likely for the media (society) to focus on issues where women have been wronged by a man rather than the other way around. If I remember correctly, Bernard Goldberg (former CBS Reporter or something like that) had a chapter in his book about how no one pays any attention to men being wronged in society. However, if a woman was wronged, there was a lot of interest in the story. My guess is this has something to do with chivilry. We expect men to take it like a man, and at the same time, we want to protect women. Based on what I've seen in divorce cases, I think this trend continues into the courts. Any individual person might get justice, but the courts tend to favor the woman's claim especially if all else is equal. I've noticed that if the man is a jerk, he loses, but really has nothing to lose (assests or income). The courts just don't have much they can do in cases like this. However, if the woman is a jerk, I've seen way too many cases where the father lost custody and was forced to pay child support. The child support often became drinking money, and this created more problems for the children than if no support was paid. I always thought it would be fair if the spouses had to keep receipts for expenses just like you have to do if you are claiming expenses from an employers. That way everyone knows that child support is going directly to the children. Tristan
|