samboct
Posts: 1817
Joined: 1/17/2007 Status: offline
|
I agree with Wolvenfury- a good therapist does not let his/her biases enter. Its where the phrase "non-judgmental" entered the lexicon as a positive trait. For most of us, we pride ourselves on our good judgment. My concern is that a "kink aware" therapist has a different set of biases than kink unfriendly, but does not possess what is called "a neutral analytic stance." If a kink aware therapist is as neutral as anybody else- fine, but I'd be concerned if that was a selling point. If a shrink has a problem with kink-that's a lousy shrink. Unfortunately, given the parlous state of mental health today, there are probably more lousy shrinks than good ones. The best trained shrinks are analysts- and most of them are not young. ""Couples therapy rarely works. And I'd take a good therapist over a kink aware therapist- it's irrelevant." This is very blatantly wrong; these things matter very much. We've done therapy together once before and had a horrible experience. The psychiatrist visibly got angry at me when discussing issues of our sex life, and after further details threatened to have my s/o committed if she doesn't stop being submissive during sexual encounters (even if they were, in my s/o's words, extremely positive sexual encounters...which was the vast majority)." Seems to me that we agree here. A shrink should not get angry with a patient- that's not a neutral stance. And I'm not sure why people view mental health treatment differently than any other health treatment. If you're wife is diagnosed with cancer, do you need to be in the examining room with her? Yes, you're supposed to be supportive, but there's a difference between being supportive and allowing your own concerns to intrude on her therapy. Hence my comment that couples therapy rarely works. You each have your own issues to work on- where's the synergy? Sam
|