Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: One Dominants controversial thought on d/s


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master >> RE: One Dominants controversial thought on d/s Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: One Dominants controversial thought on d/s - 3/19/2006 8:05:27 PM   
Angeni


Posts: 88
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline
quote:

It made perfect sense to me that the dom and the sub woman would collude and try to demolish thinking woman

To deomolish one's thoughts is to turn a person into a robot. Is that what is desirable?

quote:

I would similarly expect that people who would put their brain on hold in many situations so as to serve a master ("he knows best"), who without objection think of themselves as fuckTOYS on many occastions, and savor this, would identify themselves with the submissive woman and hate thinking woman.

It takes a person of STRENGTH to accomplish such a feat...to be able to think of themselves in such a way. To gain that strength, one must be able to THINK about the issues involved, and the outcome of such behavior. And yet, you would perfer to have someone who had not thought out the consequenses of placing themselves in such a mind-set? Sounds kind of risky to me...both emotionally and mentally.

quote:

Also his discriptoin of one not wanting to be sadistic towards one's wife after they have been together a long time, after she has born him children, also made a lot of sense to me,....

I would think that the with the strength of such a love between two people, that this would be a more ideal situation. To be so sadistic towards your partner, and yet know that there is an underlying thread of love and trust there...is freeing, not restricting.

(in reply to SpaceForMore)
Profile   Post #: 201
RE: One Dominants controversial thought on d/s - 3/20/2006 5:13:07 AM   
KnightofMists


Posts: 7149
Joined: 7/29/2005
Status: offline
simple fact... some dominants are afraid of a submissive being smarter than themselves.... How can one possibly be dominant and have authority of the submissive that is smarter than oneself?  the answer for them is to demolish the submissive from thinking.....

...   A sad answer in my opinion.



_____________________________

Knight of Mists

An Optimal relationship is achieved when the individuals do what is best for themselves and their relationship.

(in reply to Angeni)
Profile   Post #: 202
RE: One Dominants controversial thought on d/s - 3/20/2006 6:20:36 AM   
LuckyAlbatross


Posts: 19224
Joined: 10/25/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SpaceForMore
He does not have to be lucky albatross or celeste, whose admirable reasoning power, and rigour in handling of issues, is delivered in a manner akin to one of a brain surgeon.

Wow thanks, I've actually been feeling rather lazy about it lately myself.

_____________________________

Find stable partners, not a stable of partners.

"Sometimes my whore logic gets all fuzzy"- Californication

(in reply to SpaceForMore)
Profile   Post #: 203
RE: One Dominants controversial thought on d/s - 3/20/2006 7:21:52 AM   
ArtCatDom


Posts: 478
Joined: 1/20/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL:cillydom

Respect and how it can ruin the d/s relationship. I know those are fighting words. For the dominant to extract his desires from his submissive he cant be overly concerned with displaying respect for her. After all if he’s to humiliate and objectify her, too much respect would only be a hindrance. This doesn’t mean he may not love her but that he’s not going to let that get in the way. After all he’s going to use her in ways he would never try with women to whom he had to socially show respect. The submissive woman doesn’t want an overly hesitant dominant always afraid he’s hurting her feelings.


As a person, I simply can't bring myself to be with someone that I do not respect. I need to feel as though my partner has a sense of themselves, vigorously holds to their identity and can rub a few brain cells together now and again. If I wanted someone I wasn't corcerned about respecting, I would hit a college bar and find a drunk sorority girl who likes a little kink.

As a Dom, I have no real interest in objectifying a sub and little interest in humiliating them. If I wanted something to objectify, I can purchase a RealDoll tailored to my exact wants. If I wanted to humiliate somone, the internet age has made a world of idiots available at a click to tear apart. I've had no need to treat my subs like objects or degrade them to maintain control or maintain a feeling of control.

If you think love gets in the way of treating a sub like a sub, I would question both your concept of love and your concept of how a sub needs to be treated. I feel that, as you yourself mentioned, BDSM relationships are just that ... relationships. If the kink is a greater priority than the emotions, I would argue that the emotions may certainly be some kind of love but certainly not Love. Regardless, I don't see why there even has to be a conflict between love and kink at all, if both are a distinct part of the relationship.

quote:

Years of lifestyle experience and the gift of submission. O, please. First off, it’s not a gift, she craves to be there in fact it may even be in desperation that she’s there. I know it’s not the common fantasy, but it is the reality. She craves the use the dominant puts her to. It’s an inner need, it’s not a chosen need. Who in their right mind would choose to be either a dominant or a submissive? life in the vanilla world is so much easier. Being a good dominant takes desire, thought, work and persistence few men can comprehend. When I first began to understand what my dominant feelings meant, I joined the scene so to say, I came to realize early on that after attending a few meetings most any submissive woman was ruined, and would need years of intense psychotherapy at the hands of a good dominant to set her mind right. They were filled with the idea that she was in charge and that she was a precious commodity to be cherished and respected. She was imbued with idea that she could just say “no” and all would be well. When in fact that was farthest from what she needed. Most dominants prefer someone with little so called “lifestyle experience” but great desire and need. He prefers to teach her himself to be the object of his desires. Self education may exercise the fantasy but does little or nothing to prepare her for the reality of a d/s relationship. After all fantasies are episodic, d/s is full time. Big difference.


I happen to agree with the view that submission is a gift given to a Dom/me. Certainly I have cherished that gift each time it was given to me. It is a raw intimacy. In many cases, subs are literally putting their life in the Dom/me's hands. The differance between a bound sub and a well-tied corpse at the bottom of a river (to be extreme) is what the Dom/me does after the sub is restrained. To degrade that trust and love by implying it should not be cherished and respected is anathema to me.

quote:

Objectification is a means to instill a feeling of humiliation in her, it removes from her, her personhood, her individuality, hence her right to refuse. She becomes an object to be used without thought, a vessel to fulfill his every desire.


This is utterly repulsive to me. I most honestly believe that our individual natures are a gift from our Creator and that to destroy that is among the worst blasphemies.

I would add that the only thing distinguishing rape and kink is consent. Call me a fan of safe, sane and consentual.

Just adding my own views on the matter, given they so sharply diverge from yours.

*meow*

< Message edited by ArtCatDom -- 3/20/2006 7:46:12 AM >

(in reply to MstrssPassion)
Profile   Post #: 204
RE: One Dominants controversial thought on d/s - 3/20/2006 7:47:47 AM   
cillydom


Posts: 332
Joined: 3/3/2006
Status: offline
Sometimes reading some comments I wonder what posting they read, seems not the one I wrote.
The one I wrote is an expression of the kind of relationship I want and have had in the past.
It was written to appeal to the type of submissive I seek and it was written to express a point of view, it is not a how to manual.
Now I’ve read posts about intelligence that if taken to the final conclusion would indicate that all submissive women were mentally deficient, is that true.
Intelligence has nothing to do with it, submissive sexual expression is what it’s all about.
This essay is about a d/s relationship with s/m overtones. It was written with that submissive in mind, the words were carefully chosen, the phrasing carefully constructed and it did what I set out to do.
Now what I see is mostly a critique of this style of d/s and not necesarily of the essay.
The message was meant for those submissive to whom I wanted to appeal and they don’t seem to see all the inconsistencies some have found.
For the message it contains it is very consistent.
Some say I am lazy and want an easy submissive, nothing could be further from the truth as this type of relationship is very intense , close and requires almost constant attention to the submissive, far from a lazy dominants abilities. Leave her alone for any length of time and she will start to feel abandoned.
When read in this way the inconsistences spoke of start to disappear.
It is an essay that was meant to be felt and not analyzed.
How many of our longings could stand the light of cold analysis.


(in reply to cillydom)
Profile   Post #: 205
RE: One Dominants controversial thought on d/s - 3/20/2006 7:53:24 AM   
LuckyAlbatross


Posts: 19224
Joined: 10/25/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cillydom
How many of our longings could stand the light of cold analysis.

I'm full of inconsistencies, irrationalities, things that I know full well go beyond logical meaning.  And I admit them fully.

And I don't go writing long public essays trying to espouse a way of living (a way of living you've claimed as being completely consistent), written in a very universal style.

If you're willing to admit now that your writing and perspective is completely inconsistent, personal, irrational, and won't stand up to actual beyond-the-surface analysis, then I think that takes care of everything.

_____________________________

Find stable partners, not a stable of partners.

"Sometimes my whore logic gets all fuzzy"- Californication

(in reply to cillydom)
Profile   Post #: 206
RE: One Dominants controversial thought on d/s - 3/20/2006 8:01:23 AM   
cillydom


Posts: 332
Joined: 3/3/2006
Status: offline
But within your psyche your are fully consistent as is anyone unless you’re a full blown schizophrenic and they don’t see their inconsistences.
We live in a world of our own making.
To each and every one of us it is a world we feel most comfortable in.
Rationally (whatever that means) maybe not, but who among us wants to live rationally?
If we did we wouldn’t be here.


(in reply to LuckyAlbatross)
Profile   Post #: 207
RE: One Dominants controversial thought on d/s - 3/20/2006 8:12:10 AM   
LuckyAlbatross


Posts: 19224
Joined: 10/25/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cillydom
But within your psyche your are fully consistent as is anyone unless you’re a full blown schizophrenic and they don’t see their inconsistences.

People are internally inconsistent all the time.  I certainly am.  I fight with myself, I am conflicted over myself, I change my mind on things, I evaluate and re-evaluate and then re-evaluate the entire process of evaluating.

On some level, yes I have created a schema of organization and consistency that allows me to function rather well in the world around me.  But within each layer exists some measure of inconsistency and irrationality that will at time simply spike up and out and shove me and spin me and irritate me until I either find a way to reconcile it or admit defeat.

quote:


Rationally (whatever that means) maybe not, but who among us wants to live rationally?
If we did we wouldn’t be here.

Uh why not?  In some ways I live very rationally and I want to. 

_____________________________

Find stable partners, not a stable of partners.

"Sometimes my whore logic gets all fuzzy"- Californication

(in reply to cillydom)
Profile   Post #: 208
RE: One Dominants controversial thought on d/s - 3/20/2006 8:26:16 AM   
cillydom


Posts: 332
Joined: 3/3/2006
Status: offline
By rationally I meant as others wold see us, social rationality,
poor wording.
As for me reality suks, I’m looking for a good fantasy.

(in reply to LuckyAlbatross)
Profile   Post #: 209
RE: One Dominants controversial thought on d/s - 3/20/2006 10:02:27 AM   
Mercnbeth


Posts: 11766
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cillydom
As for me reality suks, I’m looking for a good fantasy.


If you turned that around perhaps you'd have a better chance.

You are representing that your "reality suks" and expect someone to be attracted to it? People don't need another person for "fantasy". Fantasies are something to share after you have established trust with another person. A relationship needs a reality based foundation.  

People who desire to meet people real time do not come here seeking fantasy. They come to for an opportunity to experience reality. If you are advertising that yours "suks", no matter how else you represent yourself, you're not representing an attractive opportunity.

(in reply to cillydom)
Profile   Post #: 210
RE: One Dominants controversial thought on d/s - 3/20/2006 10:07:39 AM   
SpaceForMore


Posts: 32
Joined: 2/24/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: catize


quote:

ORIGINAL: SpaceForMore

This style of cd's has not bothered me any, because i disregard his dismissive style and savor much of the treasure he delivers. For example, I did not find objectionable his description of the conflict between thinking-woman and submissive woman. I loved the drama he presented there, hated thinking woman, and loved submissive woman.

It made perfect sense to me that the dom and the sub woman would collude and try to demolish thinking woman. I would similarly expect that people who would put their brain on hold in many situations so as to serve a master ("he knows best"), who without objection think of themselves as fuckTOYS on many occastions, and savor this, would identify themselves with the submissive woman and hate thinking woman.
SFM


Why would it be desirable to 'demolish' one's analytical side? It is THINKING WOMAN/MAN who determines if it is safe to submit to this person!



Catize, you are right. To me, though, thinking woman's role initially, is very important. As you say, it is she who does the thinking and decides to submit.

The question then is, what is she submitting? To some people it may be her body, and to others it may be her intellect/thinking? and to others, perhaps both? If submission excludes the mental aspect entirely, would we not be losing that segment of the bdsm population that craves that?

(in reply to catize)
Profile   Post #: 211
RE: One Dominants controversial thought on d/s - 3/20/2006 10:29:45 AM   
cillydom


Posts: 332
Joined: 3/3/2006
Status: offline
it's just an expression

i've aranged my life to encompass my fantasy

i've not had to hit an alarm clock in 3 years

(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 212
RE: One Dominants controversial thought on d/s - 3/20/2006 11:12:02 AM   
BitaTruble


Posts: 9779
Joined: 1/12/2006
From: Texas
Status: offline
quote:


As for me reality suks, I’m looking for a good fantasy.


 
I finally get you.
 
Celeste
 
P.S. Ack! What's up with this font size?

_____________________________

"Oh, so it's just like
Rock, paper, scissors."

He laughed. "You are the wisest woman I know."


(in reply to cillydom)
Profile   Post #: 213
RE: One Dominants controversial thought on d/s - 3/20/2006 11:26:54 AM   
SpaceForMore


Posts: 32
Joined: 2/24/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Angeni

quote:

It made perfect sense to me that the dom and the sub woman would collude and try to demolish thinking woman

To deomolish one's thoughts is to turn a person into a robot. Is that what is desirable?



Precisely. but, with consent. Also, more importantly, to me, it is not a sealed case. It is to be revisited all the time, and stopped if it were not fun anymore -- to either one. I hope this clarifies the misunderstanding.

(in reply to Angeni)
Profile   Post #: 214
RE: One Dominants controversial thought on d/s - 3/20/2006 11:43:35 AM   
SpaceForMore


Posts: 32
Joined: 2/24/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: KnightofMists

simple fact... some dominants are afraid of a submissive being smarter than themselves.... How can one possibly be dominant and have authority of the submissive that is smarter than oneself?


If a submissive smarter than me were to submit to me, I would consider it the highest honor and enjoy the gift even more.

quote:



the answer for them is to demolish the submissive from thinking.....

...   A sad answer in my opinion.


"demolish" may have been too harsh a word to use, and led to the impression of wanting to hurt the sub. Maybe these would sound better: weakening the submissive's analytical side... overcoming the submissive's resistance to submit... helping the submissive throw caution to the wind... Once trust has been established with the dominant, then letting go?

Appearance of previous confusing points notwithstanding, brains/thinking in a woman is the biggest turn on for me, though, paradoxically, "dumb blonde" is equally intoxicating.

(in reply to KnightofMists)
Profile   Post #: 215
RE: One Dominants controversial thought on d/s - 3/20/2006 12:45:49 PM   
SimplyV


Posts: 351
Joined: 11/5/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SpaceForMore

quote:

ORIGINAL: KnightofMists

simple fact... some dominants are afraid of a submissive being smarter than themselves.... How can one possibly be dominant and have authority of the submissive that is smarter than oneself?


If a submissive smarter than me were to submit to me, I would consider it the highest honor and enjoy the gift even more.

quote:



the answer for them is to demolish the submissive from thinking.....

... A sad answer in my opinion.


"demolish" may have been too harsh a word to use, and led to the impression of wanting to hurt the sub. Maybe these would sound better: weakening the submissive's analytical side... overcoming the submissive's resistance to submit... helping the submissive throw caution to the wind... Once trust has been established with the dominant, then letting go?

Appearance of previous confusing points notwithstanding, brains/thinking in a woman is the biggest turn on for me, though, paradoxically, "dumb blonde" is equally intoxicating.


I happen to have experienced KnightofMists theory first hand on many occaision. While I was seeking a Dominant, I found many Dominants who were intimidated by my "intelligence".

How do you handle always being wrong? Any intellectual debates or conversations, always being proven wrong or being persuaded to your subs viewpoint? Or not being able to persuade your sub to your viewpoint?

For me, if I am to follow someone or submit to them.. there must be a certain level of intellect in place and it better be more than just how to hold a whip.

You know what.. come to think of it.. I've even had men break up with me because they could never win against me even in a card or board game.

'Course then I've probably won submissives to me for those very qualities.

(in reply to SpaceForMore)
Profile   Post #: 216
RE: One Dominants controversial thought on d/s - 3/20/2006 12:52:20 PM   
JohnWarren


Posts: 3807
Joined: 3/18/2005
From: Delray Beach, FL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BitaTruble

quote:


As for me reality suks, I’m looking for a good fantasy.


 
I finally get you.

 
Celeste
]P.S. Ack! What's up with this font size?


This is what I thought he was doing from the first. It was confusing because he kept insisting he was talking about something that he was doing in the real world.

_____________________________

www.lovingdominant.org

(in reply to BitaTruble)
Profile   Post #: 217
RE: One Dominants controversial thought on d/s - 3/20/2006 1:07:58 PM   
cillydom


Posts: 332
Joined: 3/3/2006
Status: offline
I guess it’s the old my kink is erotic and your’s is perverted
so I guess im just a pervert

(in reply to JohnWarren)
Profile   Post #: 218
RE: One Dominants controversial thought on d/s - 3/20/2006 1:09:55 PM   
LuckyAlbatross


Posts: 19224
Joined: 10/25/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cillydom
I guess it’s the old my kink is erotic and your’s is perverted
so I guess im just a pervert

Yes that's exactly what's happening.  You're just too cool for everyone.

_____________________________

Find stable partners, not a stable of partners.

"Sometimes my whore logic gets all fuzzy"- Californication

(in reply to cillydom)
Profile   Post #: 219
RE: One Dominants controversial thought on d/s - 3/20/2006 1:26:33 PM   
cillydom


Posts: 332
Joined: 3/3/2006
Status: offline
do people go out of their way to not understand?

(in reply to LuckyAlbatross)
Profile   Post #: 220
Page:   <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master >> RE: One Dominants controversial thought on d/s Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.349